Advertisement

Long-Term Housing and Work Outcomes Among Treated Cocaine-Dependent Homeless Persons

  • Stefan G. KerteszEmail author
  • Ashley N. Mullins
  • Joseph E. Schumacher
  • Dennis Wallace
  • Katharine Kirk
  • Jesse B. Milby
Regular Article

Abstract

Communities across the United States have initiated plans to end chronic homelessness. In many of these communities, addiction treatment programs remain the default point of entry to housing and services. This study examined the percentage of cocaine-using homeless persons (all with psychiatric distress) attaining stable housing and employment 12 months after entering a randomized trial of intensive behavioral day treatment, plus one of the following for 6 months: no housing; housing contingent on drug abstinence; housing not contingent on abstinence. Of 138 participants, the percentages with stable housing and employment at 12 months were 34.1 and 33.3%, respectively. Analyses suggested superior outcomes in trial arms that offered housing as part of the behavioral treatment. The majority of participants, however, did not achieve housing or employment, in part because of the limited capacity of the local housing programs to accommodate persons who had not achieved perfect abstinence. The findings demonstrate a helpful role for addiction treatment and suggest the need for services to support housing of persons who reduce but do not eliminate all substance use.

Keywords

homeless persons randomized controlled trials addiction treatment rehabilitative outcomes employment contingency management health policy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Data collection, analysis, and manuscript preparation were supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (awards DA08475, DA11789, K23-DA15487). The author is grateful for the analytic assistance of Tony Horn, MS and Young-il Kim, MS.

References

  1. 1.
    Burt MR, Hedderson J, Zweig J, et al. Strategies for reducing chronic street homelessness. Washington, DC: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research 2004. Report No. Available at: http://www.urban.org/publications/1000775.html. Accessed September 30, 2006.
  2. 2.
    United States Interagency Council on Homelessness. City and County 10-Year Plan Update. Published; 2006: Available at: http://www.ich.gov/slocal/plans/10-year-plan-communities.pdf. Accessed July 21, 2006.
  3. 3.
    United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for the Collaborative Initiative to Help End Chronic Homelessness. Published; 2003: Available at: http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/homeless/apply/2002nofa/index.cfm. Accessed September 30, 2006.
  4. 4.
    Editorial. Up and Off the Streets. New York Times. June 9, 2003; A:30.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Editorial. Ending Chronic Homelessness. New York Times. March 13, 2002; A:24.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burt MR, Aron LY, Lee E, et al. Helping America’s Homeless: Emergency Shelter or Affordable Housing? Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meyer IH, Schwartz S. Social issues as public health: promise and peril. American Journal of Public Health. 2000;90(8):1189–1191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wright JD, Rubin BA, Devine JA. Beside the Golden Door: Policy, Politics, and the Homeless. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1998.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vangeest JB, Johnson TP. Substance abuse and homelessness: direct or indirect effects? Annals of Epidemiology. 2002;12(7):455–461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    The Secretary’s Work Group on Ending Chronic Homelessness. Ending Chronic Homelessness: Strategies for Action. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health and Human Services, USA 2003. Report No. Available at: http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/homelessness/strategies03/index.htm. Accessed September 28, 2006.
  11. 11.
    Burt MR, Aron LY, Douglas T, et al. Homelessness: Programs and the People They Serve. Technical Report of Findings of the National Survey of Homeless Assistance Providers and Clients. Washington, DC: Urban Institute 1999. Report No. Available at: http://www.huduser.org/publications/homeless/homeless_tech.html. Accessed September 28, 2006.
  12. 12.
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Blueprint for Change: Ending Chronic Homelessness for Persons with Serious Mental Illnesses and Co-Occurring Substance Use Disorders. DNNS Pub. No. SMA-04-3870. Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2003. Report No. Available at: http://mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/publications/allpubs/SMA04-3870/default.asp. Accessed September 30, 2006.
  13. 13.
    Orwin RG, Scott CK, Arieira C. Transitions through homelessness and factors that predict them: three-year treatment outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2005;28(Suppl 1):S23–S39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Burnam MA, Morton SC, McGlynn EA, et al. An experimental evaluation of residential and nonresidential treatment for dually diagnosed homeless adults. Journal of Addictive Diseases. 1995;14(4):111–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith EM, North CS, Fox LW. Eighteen-month follow-up data on a treatment program for homeless substance abusing mothers. Journal of Addictive Diseases. 1995;14(4):57–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lapham SC, Hall M, Skipper BJ. Homelessness and substance use among alcohol abusers following participation in Project H&ART. Journal of Addictive Diseases. 1995;14(4):41–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Conrad KJ, Hultman CI, Pope AR, et al. Case managed residential care for homeless addicted veterans. Results of a true experiment. Medical Care. 1998;36(1):40–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sosin MR, Bruni M, Reidy M. Paths and impacts in the progressive independence model: a homelessness and substance abuse intervention in Chicago. Journal of Addictive Diseases. 1995;14(4):1–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Milby JB, Schumacher JE, Wallace D, et al. To house or not to house? Does it make a difference? American Journal of Public Health. 2005;95(7):1259–1265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Milby JB, Schumacher JE. To House or not to house? Does it make a difference? American Journal of Public Health. 2005;95:1259–1265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Milby JB, Schumacher JE, Raczynski JM, et al. Sufficient conditions for effective treatment of substance abusing homeless persons. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1996;43(1-2):39–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Milby JB, Schumacher JE, McNamara C, et al. Initiating abstinence in cocaine abusing dually diagnosed homeless persons. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2000;60(1):55–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    United States Congress. Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act. Public Law 100-77; 1987.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    McNamara C, Schumacher JE, Milby JB, et al. Prevalence of nonpsychotic mental disorders does not affect treatment outcome in a homeless cocaine-dependent sample. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 2001;27(1):91–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Derogatis LR. The SCL-R-Manual I: Scoring, Administration and Procedures for the SCL-90. Baltimore, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research; 1977.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Iguchi MY, Belding MA, Morral AR, et al. Reinforcing operants other than abstinence in drug abuse treatment: an effective alternative for reducing drug use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1997;65(3):421–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hansten ML, Downey L, Rosengren DB, et al. Relationship between follow-up rates and treatment outcomes in substance abuse research: more is better but when is “enough” enough? Addiction. 2000;95(9):1403–1416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barrow S, Hellman F, Lovell A, et al. Personal History Form. In: Community Support Systems Evaluation Program, Epidemiology of Mental Disorders Research Department. New York State Psychiatric Institute; 1985.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Drake RE, McHugo GJ, Biesanz JC. The test–retest reliability of standardized instruments among homeless persons with substance use disorders. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1995;56(2):161–167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Orwin RG, Scott CK, Arieira CR. Transitions through homelessness and factors that predict them: residential outcomes in the Chicago Target Cities treatment sample. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2003;26:379–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fischer PJ, Breakey WR. The epidemiology of alcohol, drug, and mental disorders among homeless persons. American Psychologist. 1991;46(11):1115–1128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kowal J. Homeless alcoholics receive a permanent place to live, and drink. The New York Times. July 5, 2006; A:12.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tsemberis S, Gulcur L, Nakae M. Housing First, consumer choice, and harm reduction for homeless individuals with a dual diagnosis. American Journal of Public Health. 2004;94(4):651–656.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gladwell M. Million-dollar Murray: why problems like homelessness may be easier to solve than to manage. The New Yorker. February 13, 2006:96–107.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rosenheck R, Kasprow W, Frisman L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of supported housing for homeless persons with mental illness. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2003;60(9):940–951.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Orwin RG, Goldman HH, Sonnefeld LJ, et al. Community Demonstration Grant Projects for Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment of Homeless Individuals: Final Evaluation Report. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism 1993. Report No.: NIH Pub. No. 93-3541.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Higgins ST, Budney AJ, Bickel WK, et al. Incentives improve outcome in outpatient behavioral treatment of cocaine dependence. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1994;51:568–576.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stitzer ML, Iguchi MY, Felch LJ. Contingent take-home incentive: effects on drug use of methadone maintenance patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1992;60(6):927–934.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Milby JB, Schumacher JE, McNamara C, et al. Initiating abstinence in cocaine abusing dually diagnosed homeless persons. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2000;60(1):55–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    McLellan AT, Lewis DC, O’Brien CP, et al. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. JAMA. 2000;284(13):1689–1695.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dennis M, Scott CK, Funk R. An experimental evaluation of recovery management checkups (RMC) for people with chronic substance use disorders. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2003;26(3):339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Caton CL, Hasin D, Shrout PE, et al. Risk factors for homelessness among indigent urban adults with no history of psychotic illness: a case-control study. American Journal of Public Health. 2000;90(2):258–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Code of Federal Regulations, Shelter Plus Care, 24 C.F.R. 582.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bipartisan Millennial Housing Commission. Meeting Our Nation’s Housing Challenges. Washington, D.C.: Congress of the United States; May 30, 2002. Report No. Available at: http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/mhc/MHCReport.pdf. Accessed September 30, 2006.
  45. 45.
    Simpson DD, Joe GW, Fletcher BW, et al. A national evaluation of treatment outcomes for cocaine dependence. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1999;56(6):507–514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Stahler GJ, Shipley TF, Jr., Bartelt D, et al. Evaluating alternative treatments for homeless substance-abusing men: outcomes and predictors of success. Journal of Addictive Diseases. 1995;14(4):151–167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kertesz SG, Horton NJ, Friedmann PD, et al. Slowing the revolving door: stabilization programs reduce homeless persons’ substance use after detoxification. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2003;24(3):197–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    McLellan AT, McKay JR. The treatment of addiction: what can research offer practice. In: Lamb S, Greenlick MR, McCarty D, eds. Bridging the Gap Between Practice and Research: Forging Partnerships with Community-Based Drug and Alcohol Treatment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1998:147–185.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kraybill K, Zerger S. Providing Treatment for Homeless People with Substance Use Disorders: Case Studies of Six Programs. Memphis: National Health Care for the Homeless Council; August, 2003. Report No. Available at: http://www.nhchc.org/Advocacy/FactSheets/CA05RCaseStudies-FINAL5.pdf. Accessed June 5, 2005.
  50. 50.
    O’Brien CP. Anticraving medications for relapse prevention: a possible new class of psychoactive medications. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2005;162(8):1423–1431.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Beyond Shelter. The “Housing First” Program for Homeless Families: Methodology Manual. Los Angeles, California: Beyond Shelter, Inc.; 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan G. Kertesz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ashley N. Mullins
    • 2
  • Joseph E. Schumacher
    • 3
  • Dennis Wallace
    • 4
  • Katharine Kirk
    • 5
  • Jesse B. Milby
    • 6
  1. 1.Division of Preventive Medicine, School of MedicineUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham and the Deep South Center on Effectiveness at the Birmingham Veterans’ Affairs Medical CenterBirminghamUSA
  2. 2.The Wright InstituteBerkeleyUSA
  3. 3.Division of Preventive Medicine, School of MedicineBirminghamUSA
  4. 4.Rho Federal Systems, Inc.Chapel HillUSA
  5. 5.Division of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine and the Department of Biostatistics, School of Public HealthUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA
  6. 6.Department of PsychologyThe University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations