Advertisement

Towards a micro-ecological approach to CSCL

  • Marcela BorgeEmail author
  • Emma Mercier
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that how we use theories may be preventing us from developing a deeper understanding of computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) contexts. We focus the argument on our understanding of orchestration processes and draw on common theories to show how they prioritize a mono-ecological approach: the examination of collaborative processes at a single level of an ecological system. We argue that doing so prevents us from seeing the full complexity of the types of decisions that teachers and learners make when implementing collaborative learning activities in technologically enhanced, real-world contexts. To address this problem, we propose a micro-ecological framework that recognizes collaborative learning as a complex, cognitively nested, ecological phenomenon and analyzes interactions in a way that aligns with this view. Our approach focuses on the microanalysis of interactions between individuals, learning objects, the small group, and the classroom community. The purpose of this analysis is to identify critical points in the learning process where actions at one level of cognitive activity propagate to influence other levels of individual and joint activity. We call these events transecological disruptions. We argue that these disruptions can provide opportunities to understand how the learning ecology develops over time through teacher orchestration and learner engagement. To illustrate our framework, we pursue the following research question: “How can a micro-ecological framework help us better understand the CSCL ecology?”

Keywords

Theoretical frameworks Ecological systems Orchestration Evaluation Methods Learning community 

Notes

References

  1. Akkerman, S., Vandenbossche, P., Admiraal, W., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., Simons, R., & Kirschner, P. (2007). Reconsidering group cognition: From conceptual confusion to a boundary area between cognitive and socio-cultural perspectives? Educational Research Review, 2(1), 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arvaja, M. (2007). Contextual perspective in analysing collaborative knowledge construction of two small groups in web-based discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2-3), 133–158.Google Scholar
  3. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barron, B., Martin, C. K., Mercier, E., Pea, R., Steinbock, D., Walter, S., et al. (2009). Repertoires of collaborative practice. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning - CSCL’09 (pp. 25–27).  https://doi.org/10.3115/1599503.1599513.Google Scholar
  5. Borge, M., & White, B. (2016). Toward the development of socio-metacognitive expertise: An approach to developing collaborative competence. Cognition and Instruction, 34(4), 323–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borge, M., Ong, Y. S., & Rosé, C. P. (2018). Learning to monitor and regulate collective thinking processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(1), 61–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1974). Is early intervention effective? Early Childhood Education Journal, 2(2), 14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chounta, I. A., & Avouris, N. (2016). Towards the real-time evaluation of collaborative activities: Integration of an automatic rater of collaboration quality in the classroom from the teacher’s perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 21(4), 815–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clegg, T., Yip, J. C., Ahn, J., Bonsignore, E., Gubbels, M., Lewittes, B., & Rhodes, E. (2013). When face-to-face fails: Opportunities for social media to foster collaborative learning. In Tenth International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 272–276).Google Scholar
  12. Damşa, C. I., & Ludvigsen, S. (2016). Learning through interaction and co-construction of knowledge objects in teacher education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 11, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dessus, P., Cosnefroy, O., & Luengo, V. (2016). “Keep your eyes on’em all!”: A Mobile eye-tracking analysis of teachers’ sensitivity to students. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 72–84). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 3–19). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dimitriadis, Y. A. (2012). Supporting teachers in orchestrating CSCL classrooms. In Research on e-learning and ICT in education (pp. 71–82). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grant, L. (2009). ‘I DON’T CARE DO UR OWN PAGE!‘A case study of using wikis for collaborative work in a UK secondary school. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Guzdial, M., Ludovice, P., Realff, M., Morley, T., & Carroll, K. (2002). When collaboration doesn’t work. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 125–130).Google Scholar
  20. Herrenkohl, L. R., & Mertl, V. (2010). How students come to be, know, and do: A case for a broad view of learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hmelo, C. E., Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (1998). Computer-support for collaborative learning: Learning to support student engagement. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 9(2), 107–129.Google Scholar
  22. Hogan, K. (1999). Thinking aloud together: A test of an intervention to foster students' collaborative scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1085–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Järvelä, S., Volet, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive–situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kerr, N., & Tindale, S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 623–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kozlowski, S., & Ilgen, D. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McGrath, R. (1999). Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mercier, E., & Higgins, S. E. (2015). The four Ts of the collaborative classroom. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 1411, pp. 15–19).Google Scholar
  28. Nathan, M. J., & Alibali, M. W. (2010). Learning sciences. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(3), 329–345.Google Scholar
  29. Norman, D. A. (1986). Cognitive engineering. In D. A. Norman & S. W. Draper (Eds.), User- centered system design (pp. 31–61). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
  31. Prieto, L. P., Sharma, K., Wen, Y., & Dillenbourg, P. (2015). The burden of facilitating collaboration: Towards estimation of teacher orchestration load using eye-tracking measures. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2015) (pp. 212–219). Sweden: Gothenburg.Google Scholar
  32. Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Prieto, L. P., Vozniuk, A., Boroujeni, M. S., Schwendimann, B. A., Holzer, A., & Gillet, D. (2017). Monitoring, awareness and reflection in blended technology enhanced learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 9(2–3), 126–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roschelle, J., Dimitriadis, Y., & Hoppe, U. (2013). Computers & education classroom orchestration : Synthesis. Computers & Education, 69, 523–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwarz, B. B., Prusak, N., Swidan, O., Livny, A., Gal, K., & Segal, A. (2018). Orchestrating the emergence of conceptual learning: A case study in a geometry class. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharma, K., Jermann, P., Dillenbourg, P., Prieto, L. P., D’Angelo, S., Gergle, D., ... & Rummel, N. (2017). CSCL and eye-tracking: Experiences, opportunities and challenges. In B. K. Smith, M. Borge, E. Mercier, & K. Y. Lim (Vol. Eds.), Making a difference: Prioritizing equity and access in CSCL: 12th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Vol. I, (pp. 727–728). ISLSGoogle Scholar
  37. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stahl, G. (2013). Theories of collaborative cognition: Foundations for CSCL and CSCW together. In Computer-supported collaborative learning at the workplace (pp. 43–63). Boston, MA: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tudge, J. R., Payir, A., Merçon-Vargas, E., Cao, H., Liang, Y., Li, J., & O'Brien, L. (2016). Still misused after all these years? A reevaluation of the uses of Bronfenbrenner's bioecological theory of human development. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8(4), 427–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van der Panne, G., van Beers, C., & Kleinknect, A. (2003). Success and failure of innovation: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), 1–29.Google Scholar
  41. Wise, A. F., & Schwarz, B. B. (2017). Visions of CSCL: Eight provocations for the future of the field. International Jounral of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(4), 423–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004). Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers & Education, 42(3), 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EducationThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.College of EducationChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations