Group practices: a new way of viewing CSCL
- 843 Downloads
The analysis of group practices can make visible the work of novices learning how to inquire in science or mathematics. These ubiquitous practices are invisibly taken for granted by adults, but can be observed and rigorously studied in adequate traces of online collaborative learning. Such an approach contrasts with traditional pre/post comparisons that miss sequential interactional processes or that reduce group phenomena to individual or social factors. The analysis of the enactment of practices by small groups in CSCL contexts can systematically inform the design, testing, and refinement of collaborative-learning software, curriculum, pedagogy, and theory. CSCL can be re-conceptualized as the design of technology to foster the adoption of group practices by student teams.
KeywordsGroup practices CSCL theory CSCL methodology Design-based research
Thanks to everyone who participated in the VMT project and who collaborated on the analysis of its data. Also, to the anonymous reviewers, who prompted me to elaborate several aspects and implications of this view of CSCL.
- Bourdieu, P. (1972/1995). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Descartes, R. (1633/1999). Discourse on method and meditations on first philosophy. New York: Hackett.Google Scholar
- Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O'Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford: Elsevier http://tecfa.unige.ch/tecfa/publicat/dil-papers-2/Dil.7.1.10.pdf.Google Scholar
- Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. (1984). Elements of the theory of structuration. In The constitution of society (pp. 1–40). Oakland, CA: U of California Press.Google Scholar
- Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Kant, I. (1787/1999). Critique of pure reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Medina, R., Suthers, D. D. & Vatrapu, R. (2009). Representational practices in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (ch. 10, pp. 185–205). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., & Savigny, E. V. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Stahl, G. (1993). Interpretation in design: The problem of tacit and explicit understanding in computer support of cooperative design. Unpublished Dissertation, Ph.D., Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado. Boulder, CO. http://GerryStahl.net/elibrary/tacit.
- Stahl, G. (2006a). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Stahl, G. (2006b). Supporting group cognition in an online math community: A cognitive tool for small-group referencing in text chat. Journal of Educational Computing Research (JECR) special issue on Cognitive tools for collaborative communities, 35(2), 103–122 http://GerryStahl.net/pub/jecr.pdf.Google Scholar
- Stahl, G. (2013b). Translating Euclid: Designing a human-centered mathematics. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.Google Scholar
- Stahl, G. (2014). The constitution of group cognition. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), Handbook of embodied cognition (ch. 32, pp. 335–346). New York: Routledge. http://GerryStahl.net/pub/embodied.pdf.
- Stahl, G. (2016c). The group as paradigmatic unit of analysis: The contested relationship of CSCL to the learning sciences. In M. A. Evans, M. J. Packer & R. K. Sawyer (Eds.), Reflections on the learning sciences (ch. 5, pp. 76–102). New York: Cambridge University Press. http://GerryStahl.net/pub/ls.pdf.
- Stahl, G., Zhou, N., Çakir, M. P. & Sarmiento-Klapper, J. W. (2011). Seeing what we mean: Co-experiencing a shared virtual world. In the Proceedings of CSCL 2011. Lulu: ISLS. Proceedings (pp. 534–541). http://GerryStahl.net/pub/cscl2011.pdf.
- Vygotsky, L. (1930/1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research. Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Zemel, A., Çakir, M. P. & Stahl, G. (2009). Understanding and analyzing chat in CSCL as reading’s work. In the Proceedings of CSCL 2009. Rhodes, Greece. http://GerryStahl.net/pub/cscl2009zemel.pdf.