Advertisement

“Newbies” and “Celebrities”: Detecting social roles in an online network of teachers via participation patterns

  • H. Smith Risser
  • SueAnn Bottoms
Article
First Online:

Abstract

The advent of social networking tools allows teachers to create online networks and share information. While some virtual networks have a formal structure and defined boundaries, many do not. These unstructured virtual networks are difficult to study because they lack defined boundaries and a formal structure governing leadership roles and the transfer of information. The purpose of the study was to explore the relationship between how a member participates in a virtual blog network and the role of that member in the network. Unlike previous studies that use behavioral or structural characteristics of an individual’s network to infer social roles, this study utilized cluster analysis to combine behavior and structural information in role detection. Quantitative methods from social network analysis were used to compare the network structure of individual bloggers both across and within groups. The results indicate that how an individual participates in the network has an influence not only on their current role in the network, but also in how and how quickly their role in the community changes.

Keywords

Blog communities Participation K-12 Teachers 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ali-Hasan, N. & Adamic, L. (2007). Expressing social relationships on the blog through links and comments. Paper presented at the International Conference for Weblogs and Social Media, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  2. Amin, A., & Roberts, J. (2008). Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice. Research Policy, 37(2), 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anjewierden, A., Hoog, R., Brussee, R., Efimova, L. (2005, July). Detecting knowledge flows in weblogs. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Conceptual Structures. Kassel, Germany.Google Scholar
  4. Baker-Doyle, K., & Yoon, S. (2011). In search of practitioner-based social capital: A social network analysis tool for understanding and facilitating teacher collaboration in a US-based STEM professional development program. Professional Development in Education, 37(1), 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barab, S., & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments, 1, 25–55.Google Scholar
  6. Beaudoin, M. (2002). Learning or lurking? Tracking the “invisible” online student. The Internet and Higher Education, 5, 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butlers, J. & Rijke, M. (2007, March). Discovering weblog communities: A content- and topology-based approach. Paper presented at the 1st Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, F. (2004). Passive forum behaviors (lurking): A community perspective. In Y. Kafai, W. Sandoval, & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Sciences (pp. 128–135). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Chin, A., & Chignell, M. (2006). A social hypertext model for finding community in blogs. In U. Wiil, P. Nurnberg, & J. Rubart (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (pp. 11–22). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B., & Ingraffea, A. (2007). Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community. Computers & Education, 49(2), 309–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coburn, C., & Russell, J. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cross, R., & Prusak, L. (2002). The people who make organizations go—or stop. Harvard Business Review, 80(6), 104–114.Google Scholar
  13. Daly, A., & Finnigan, K. (2010). A bridge between worlds: Understanding network structure to understand change strategy. Journal of Educational Change, 11, 111–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dang, T. & Viennet, E. (2012, January). Community detection based on structural and attribute similarities. In ICDS 2012, The Sixth International Conference on Digital Society (pp. 7–12).Google Scholar
  15. de Laat, M., Lally, V., Lipponen, L., & Simons, R.-J. (2007). Investigating patterns of interaction in networked learning and computer-supported collaborative learning: A role for social network analysis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dennen, V. (2008). Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1624–1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Efimova, L. & Hendrick, S. (2005). In search for a virtual settlement: An exploration of weblog community boundaries. Available at: https://doc.novay.nl/dsweb/Get/Document-46041.
  18. Fraley, C., Raftery, A., & Scrucca, L. (2013). Mclust Package (Version 4.2) [Software]. Available from http://www.stat.washington.edu/mclust/
  19. Fulton, K., Yoon, L., & Lee, C. (2005). Induction into learning communities. Washington D.C: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.174.959&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Google Scholar
  20. Gee, J. P. (2005). Semiotic social spaces and affinity spaces. Beyond communities of practice language power and social context (pp. 214–232).Google Scholar
  21. Gleave, E., Welser, H., Lento, T., & Smith, M. (2009). A conceptual and operational definition of ‘social role’ in online community. Paper presented at the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Manoa, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  22. Gray, B. (2004). Informal learning in an online community of practice. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 20–35.Google Scholar
  23. Hanneman, R. & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social networks. Retrieved from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/
  24. Hansman, C. & Wilson, A. (2002). Situating cognition: Knowledge and power in context. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Adult Education Research Conference, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
  25. Helms, H., Proulx, C., Klute, M., McHale, S., & Crouter, A. (2006). Spouses’ gender-typed attributes and their links with marital quality: A pattern analytic approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(6), 843–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hough, B. (2004). Using computer-mediated communication to create virtual communities of practice for intern teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 361–386.Google Scholar
  27. Instone, L. (2005). Conversations beyond the classroom: Blogging in a professional development course. Proceedings of ASCILITE Conference, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  28. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  29. Judson, E., & Lawson, A. (2007). What is the role of constructivist teachers within faculty communication networks? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 490–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kardos, S., & Johnson, S. (2010). New teachers’ experiences of mentoring; the good, the bad, and the inequity. Journal of Educational Change, 11, 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Killeavy, M., & Moloney, A. (2010). Reflection in a social space: Can blogging support reflective practice for beginning teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1070–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kozinets, R. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leshed, G. (2005, July). Posters, lurkers, and in between: A multidimensional model of online community participation patterns. Poster presented at HCI International, Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
  35. Lethinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., & Muukkonen, H. (1999). Computer supported collaborative learning: A review. CL-Net Project. Available: http://www.kas.utu.fi/clnet/clnetreport.html
  36. Lin, Y-R., Sundaram, H., Chi, Y., Tatemura, J., & Tseng, B. (2007). Blog community discovery and evolution based on mutual awareness. Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (pp. 48–56). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  37. Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional practice. Teachers College Record, 91, 509–536.Google Scholar
  38. Little, J. (2002). Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 917–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lock, J. (2006). A new image: Online communities to facilitate teacher professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(4), 663–678.Google Scholar
  40. Luehmann, A., & Tinelli, L. (2008). Teacher professional identity development with social networking technologies: Learning reform through blogging. Educational Media International, 45(4), 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marcos, J., Martinez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., & Anguita, R. (2006). Interaction analysis for the detection and support of participatory roles in CSCL. In Y. Dimitriades, I. Zigurs, & E. Gomez-Sanches (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International CRIWIG workshop: Groupware: Design, implementation and use (pp. 155–162). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mislove, A., Marcon, M., Gummadi, K., Druschel, P. & Bhattacharjee, B. (2007, October). Measurement and analysis of online social networks. Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet Measurement (pp. 29–42). ACM.Google Scholar
  43. Moen, P., Erickson, M., & Dempster-McClain, D. (2000). Social role identities among older adults in a continuing care retirement community. Research on Aging, 22(5), 559–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mooi, E., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). A concise guide to market research: The process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS Statistics. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moolenaar, N., Sleegers, P., Karsten, S., & Daly, A. (2012). The social fabric of elementary schools: A network typology of social interaction among teachers. Educational Studies, 38(4), 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nakajima, S., Tatemura, J., Hino, Y., Hara, Y., & Tanaka, K. (2005, May). Discovering important bloggers based on analyzing blog threads. Annual Workshop on the Weblogging Ecosystem, 2005. Chiba, Japan.Google Scholar
  47. Pikas, C. (2008, December). Detecting community in science blogs. Paper presented at Fourth IEEE International Conference on eScience, Indianapolis, Indiana.Google Scholar
  48. Ray, B., & Hocutt, M. (2006). Teacher-created, teacher-centered weblogs: Perceptions and practices. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(1), 11–18.Google Scholar
  49. Schmidt, J. (2007). Blogging practices: An analytical framework. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1409–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sclager, M., Fusco, J., & Schank, P. (2002). Evolution of an on-line education community of practice. In K. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 129–158). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scott, J. (2009). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Sing, C., & Khine, M. (2006). An analysis of interaction and participation patterns in online community. Educational Technology and Society, 9(1), 250–261.Google Scholar
  53. Strijbos, J.-W., & De Laat, M. (2010). Developing the role concept for computer-supported collaborative learning: An explorative synthesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 495–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Welser, H., Gleave, E., Fisher, D., & Smith, M. (2007). Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups. Journal of Social Structure, 8(2), 1–32.Google Scholar
  55. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yang, S.-H. (2009). Using blogs to enhance critical reflection and community of practice. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 11–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Montana Tech of the University of MontanaButteUSA
  2. 2.Oregon State University, College of EducationCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options