Advertisement

Fostering collective and individual learning through knowledge building

  • Ke Zhao
  • Carol K. K. Chan
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to design and examine a computer-supported knowledge-building environment and to investigate both collective knowledge-building dynamics and individual learning in the context of a tertiary education course in mainland China. The participants were 102 students in four intact Year-one tertiary business classes. Two classes experienced a knowledge-building environment (CKB) and the other two were taught using a regular project-based approach (RPBL). Data were obtained from interactions in the forum, writing quality, group-learning portfolios, and surveys. Quantitative analyses indicated that the knowledge-building groups outperformed the comparison groups on academic literacy assessed in terms of conceptual understanding and explanation, and obtained higher scores on beliefs about collaboration. Within-group analyses indicated that the students’ engagement in Knowledge Forum was a significant predictor of their academic literacy. Qualitative contrastive analyses of high- and low-performance groups identified different patterns of conceptual, metacognitive and social processes, and showed that student groups engaging in more collective and meta-discourse discourse moves performed better on individual scores in academic literacy. The implications of examining both collaborative dynamics and individual learning and designing computer-supported knowledge building for tertiary students are discussed.

Keywords

Collaborative knowledge building Computer-supported inquiry Academic literacy Technology-enhanced learning environment Higher education 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Jan van Aalst from the University of Hong Kong as well as the anonymous reviewers and the handling editor for their helpful comments and constructive suggestions on earlier drafts of this article.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R., Greemo, J. G., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher, 29(4), 11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, M., Andriessen, J., Lund, K., van Amelsvoort, M., & Quignard, M. (2007). Rainbow: a framework for analyzing computer-mediated pedagogical debates. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2&3), 315–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge edge. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Bielaczyc, K. (2006). Designing social infrastructure: critical issues in creating learning environments with technology. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 301–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braine, G. (2002). Academic Literacy and the Nonnative Speaker Graduate Student. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 59.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burtis, J. (1998). The analytic toolkit. The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/ University of Toronto Centre for Applied Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
  9. Carle, A. C., Jaffee, D., & Miller, D. (2009). Engaging college science students and changing academic achievement with technology: a quasi-experimental preliminary investigation. Computers & Education, 52, 376–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chan, C. K. K. (2011). Bridging research and practice: implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Hong Kong classrooms. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 147–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan, C. K. K. (2013). Collaborative knowledge building: Towards a knowledge-creation perspective. In C. Hmelo-Silver, C. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. O’ Donnell (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  12. Chan, C. K. K., & Chan, Y.-Y. (2011). Students’ views of collaboration and online participation in knowledge forum. Computers & Education, 57, 1445–1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chan, C. K. K., & van Aalst, J. (2004). Learning, assessment, and collaboration in computer-supported collaborative learning. In J. W. Strijbos, P. Kirschner, & R. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education (pp. 87–112). Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chi, M. T. H. (2011). Theoretical perspectives, methodological approaches, and trends in the study of expertise. In Y. Li (Ed.), Expertise in Mathematics Instruction: An international perspective. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Wever, B., Valcke, M., Schellens, T., & Van Keer, H. (2005). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: a review. Computers & Education, 46(1), 6–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dosi, R., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (Eds.). (2000). The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Eastman, J. K., & Swift, C. O. (2002). Enhancing collaborative learning: discussion boards and chat rooms as project communication tools. Business Communication Quarterly, 65, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Grasel, C. & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction 12, 213–232.Google Scholar
  20. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., & Zottmann, J. (2013). Collaborative scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. In C. Hmelo-Silver, C. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 403–419). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Gan, Y. C., Scardamalia, M., Hong, H. Y., & Zhang, J. (2010). Making thinking visible: growth in graphical literacy, grades 3 to 4. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36 (1) [online]. http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/581/284.
  22. Goodyear, P., Jones, C., Asensio, M., Hodgson, V., & Steeples, C. (2005). Networked learning in higher education: students’ expectations and experiences. Higher Education, 50, 473–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Granville, S., & Dison, L. (2005). Thinking about thinking: integrating self-reflection into an academic literacy course. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(2), 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Emergence of progressive inquiry culture in computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning Environments Research, 6(2), 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Pursuit of explanation within a computer-supported classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 26(8), 979–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hanson, J. M., & Sinclair, K. E. (2008). Social constructivist teaching methods in Australian universities- reported uptake and perceived learning effects: a survey of lecturers. Higher Education Research & Development, 27(3), 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Helle, L., Tynjala, P., & Olkinuora, E. (2006). Project-based learning in post-secondary education—theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher Education, 51, 287–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hewitt, J., & Scardamalia, M. (1998). Design principles for the support of distributed processes. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2003). Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: multiple methods for integrated understanding. Computers & Education, 41(4), 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Janssen, J., et al. (2012). Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 25–43.Google Scholar
  32. Jermann, P., Soller, A., & Lesgold, A. (2004). Computer software support for CSCL. In J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education (pp. 141–166). Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koschmann, T., Hall, R., & Miyake, N. (2002). CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  34. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30, 411–433.Google Scholar
  35. Lai, M., & Law, N. (2006). Peer scaffolding of knowledge building through collaborative groups with differential learning experiences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(2), 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lea, M., & Street, B. V. (2006). The “Academic Literacies” model: theory and applications. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 368–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee, E. Y. C., Chan, C. K. K., & van Aalst, J. (2006). Students assessing their own collaborative knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 278–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lundstorm, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: the benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meier, A., Spada, H., & Rummel, N. (2007). A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration process. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Molenaar, I., Chiu, M. M., Sleegers, P., & van Boxtel, C. (2011). Scaffolding of small groups’ metacognitive activities with an avatar. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 601–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Muukkonen, H., & Lakkala, M. (2009). Exploring metaskills of knowledge-creating inquiry in higher education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ngai, E. W. T. (2007). Learning in introductory e-commerce: a project-based teamwork approach. Computers & Education, 48(1), 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oshima, J., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Collaborative learning processes associated with high and low conceptual progress. Instructional Science, 24(2), 125–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paus, E., Werner, C. S., & Jucks, R. (2012). Learning through online peer discourse: structural equation modeling points to the role of discourse activities in individual understanding. Computers & Education, 58, 1127–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pifarre, M., & Cobos, R. (2010). Promoting meta-cognitive skills through peer scaffolding in a CSCL environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Puntambekar, S., Erkens, G., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2011). Analyzing interactions in CSCL: Methodology, approaches, and issues. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Resta, P. & Lafferriere, T. (2007). Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning. Educational Psychological Review, 19, 65–83.Google Scholar
  49. Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Instructional support for collaboration in desktop videoconference settings. In R. Bromme, F. W., Hesse & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication (pp. 59–88). SpringerGoogle Scholar
  50. Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum®. In S. Barbara (Ed.), Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183–192): ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  51. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building environments: Extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work. In A. DiStefano, K. E. Rudestam, & R. Silverman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distributed learning (pp. 269–272). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Scardamalia, M., Breiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lesson: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  54. Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., & McLaren, B. M. (2010). Computer-supported argumentation: a review of the state of the art. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 43–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Short, D. J., Echevarria, J., & Richards-Tutor, C. (2011). Research on academic literacy development in sheltered instruction classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 363–380.Google Scholar
  56. Stahl, G. (2002). Rediscovering CSCL. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 169–181). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  57. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  58. Strijbos, J. W., Kirschner, P. A., & Martens, R. L. (Eds.). (2004). What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education. Norwell: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  59. Sun, Y., Zhang, J., & Scardamalia, M. (2010). Knowledge building and vocabulary growth over two years, grades 3 and 4. Instructional Science, 38(2), 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Suthers, D. D., Dwyer, N., Medina, R., & Vatrapu, R. (2010). A framework for conceptualizing, representing and analyzing distributed interaction. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tan, K. E., Ng, M. L. Y., & Saw, K. G. (2010). Online activities and writing practices of urban Malaysian adolescents. System, 38, 548–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tsai, C. C. (2009). Conceptions of learning versus conceptions of web-based learning: the differences revealed by college students. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1092–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 259–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2007). Student-directed assessment of knowledge building using electronic portfolios in Knowledge Forum. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 175–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Weinberger, A., Reiserer, M. Ertl, B. Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Facilitating collaborative knowledge construction in computer-mediated learning environments with cooperative scripts. In R. Bromme, F.W., Hesse & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication (pp. 59–88). SpringerGoogle Scholar
  66. Wen, Q. F., & Zhou, Y. (2006). On developing English Majors’ thinking skills. Foreign Language Research, 132(5), 76–80.Google Scholar
  67. Yeh, S.-W., Lo, J.-J., & Huang, J.-J. (2011). Scaffolding collaborative technical writing with procedural facilitation and synchronous discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhang, J. (2009). Technology-supported learning innovation in cultural contexts. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang, J., & Sun, Y. (2011). Reading for idea advancement in a grade 4 knowledge building community. Instructional Science, 39(4), 429–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhang, J. W., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., & Reeve, R. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9-and 10-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 117–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhao, K. & Zheng Y. Y. (2013). Chinese Business English students’ epistemological beliefs, self-regulated strategies, and collaboration in project-based learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, doi: 10.1007/s40299-013-0103-z

Copyright information

© International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. and Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Foreign Languages DepartmentShanghai University of Finance and EconomicsShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationUniversity of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong

Personalised recommendations