Advertisement

Multi-player epistemic games: Guiding the enactment of classroom knowledge-building communities

  • Katerine Bielaczyc
  • John Ow
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Teachers and students face many challenges in shifting from traditional classroom cultures to enacting the Knowledge-Building Communities model (KBC model) supported by the CSCL environment, Knowledge Forum (Bereiter, 2002; Bereiter & Scardamalia, 1993; Scardamalia, 2002; Scardamalia & Bereiter, 2006). Enacting the model involves socializing students into knowledge work, similar to disciplinary communities. A useful construct in the field of the Learning Sciences for understanding knowledge work is “epistemic games” (Collins & Ferguson, 1993; Morrison & Collins 1995; Perkins, 1997). We propose that a powerful means for supporting classroom enactments of the KBC model entails conceptualizing Knowledge Forum as a collective space for playing multi-player epistemic games. Participation in knowledge-building communities is then scaffolded through learning the moves of such games. We have designed scaffolding tools that highlight particular knowledge-building moves for practice and reflection as a means of supporting students and teachers in coming to understand how to collectively work together toward the progressive improvement of ideas. In order to examine our design theories in practice, we present research on Ideas First, a design-based research program involving enactments of the KBC model in Singaporean primary science classrooms (Bielaczyc & Ow, 2007, 2010; Ow & Bielaczyc, 2007; 2008).

Keywords

Knowledge building communities Epistemic games Design research Implementation paths 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ballenger, C. (2009). Puzzling moments, teachable moments: practicing teacher research in urban classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  4. Bielaczyc, K. (2006). Designing social infrastructure: Critical issues in creating learning environments with technology. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 301–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bielaczyc, K. (2013). Informing Design Research: Learning From Teachers’ Designs of Social Infrastructure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(2), 258–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (2006). Implementation paths: Supporting the trajectory teachers traverse in implementing technology-based learning environments in classroom practice. Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 8–14.Google Scholar
  7. Bielaczyc, K. & Ow, J. (2007) Shifting the social infrastructure: Investigating transition mechanisms for creating knowledge building communities in classrooms. In Proceedings of the International Conference for Computers in Education. Google Scholar
  8. Bielaczyc, K., & Ow, J. (2010, June). Making knowledge-building moves: toward cultivating knowledge building communities in classrooms. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences-Volume 1 (pp. 865-872). International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  9. Bielaczyc, K., Kapur, M., & Collins, A. (2013). Cultivating a community of learners in K-12 classrooms. In C. Hmelo-Silver, C. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), International Handbook of Collaborative Learning (pp. 233–249). New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilley (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, A., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–325). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  13. Caswell, B., & Bielaczyc, K. (2002). Knowledge Forum: Altering the relationship between students and scientific knowledge. Education, Communication and Information, 1(3), 281–305.Google Scholar
  14. Chan, C. K. K. (2011). Bridging research and practice: Implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Hong Kong classrooms. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 147–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins, A., & Ferguson, W. (1993). Epistemic forms and epistemic games: Structures and strategies for guiding inquiry. Educational Psychologist, 28(1), 25–42.Google Scholar
  16. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ford, M. J. (2010). Critique in academic disciplines and active learning of academic content. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(3), 265–280.Google Scholar
  18. Frederiksen, J. R., Sipusic, M., Sherin, M., & Wolfe, E. (1998). Video portfolio assessment: Creating a framework for viewing the functions of teaching. Educational Assessment, 5(4), 225–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herrenkohl, L. R., Palincsar, A. S., DeWater, L. S., & Kawasaki, K. (1999). Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 451–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hewitt, J. (2002). From a focus on tasks to a focus on understanding: The cultural transformation of a Toronto classroom. Computer supported cooperative learning, 2, 11–41.Google Scholar
  21. Hogan, K., & Corey, C. (2001). Viewing classrooms as cultural contexts for fostering scientific literacy. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 32(2), 214–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kolodner, J. (2006, April) The learning sciences and the future of education: What we know and what we need to be doing better. Paper presented at the annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  23. Koschmann, T., Hall, R., & Miyake, N. (2002). CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  24. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven CN: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lampert, M., Rittenhouse, P., & Crumbaugh, C. (1996). Agreeing to disagree: Developing sociable mathematical discourse. In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Handbook of Education and Human Development (pp. 731–764). Oxford: Blackwell’s Press.Google Scholar
  26. Messina, R. (2001, April) Interactive learners, cooperative knowledge building, and classroom inventions. Paper presented at the annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle WA.Google Scholar
  27. Morrison, D., & Collins, A. (1996). Epistemic fluency and constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design (pp. 107–119). Englewood Cliffs NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Ow, J. & Bielaczyc, K. (2007) Epistemic perturbations: Using material artifacts to cultivate a knowledge building culture in classrooms. In Proceedings of the International Conference for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Google Scholar
  29. Ow, J. & Bielaczyc, K. (2008). Designing artifacts for “epistemological perturbations” – Changing the bias of learning environments for Knowledge Building. Paper presented at the Eleventh Annual Knowledge Forum Summer Institute, Toronto, CA.Google Scholar
  30. Perkins, D. N. (1997). Epistemic games. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(1), 49–61.Google Scholar
  31. Perkins, D. (2009). Making learning whole: How seven principles of teaching can transform education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Sandoval, W. A., Bell, P., Coleman, E., Enyedy, N., & Suthers, D. (2000, April). Designing knowledge representations for learning epistemic practices of science. In Position paper for an interactive symposium entitled Designing Knowledge Representations for Learning Epistemic Practices of Science, presented at the annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  33. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in the knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  34. Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum®. In Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183–192). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  35. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. Advances in applied psycholinguistics, 2, 142–175.Google Scholar
  36. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Adaptation and understanding: A case for new cultures of schooling. In S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte, R. Glaser, & H. Mandl (Eds.), International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments (pp. 149–163). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  39. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-115). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2007). “Fostering communities of learners” and “knowledge building”: An interrupted dialogue. In J. Campione, K. Metz, & A. M. Palincsar (Eds.), Children’s learning in and out of school: Essays in honor of Ann Brown (pp. 89–111). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  41. Shaffer, D. W. (2006). Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Computers & Education, 46(3), 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. (2010). The CSCL field matures. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning., 5(1), 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. and Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jacob Hiatt Center for Urban EducationClark UniversityWorcesterUSA
  2. 2.National Institute of EducationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options