Co-located single display collaborative learning for early childhood education

  • Florencia Gómez
  • Miguel Nussbaum
  • Juan F. Weitz
  • Ximena Lopez
  • Javiera Mena
  • Alex Torres
Article

Abstract

The benefits of collaborative learning are well documented. However, most of the research has been done with children beyond the ages of early childhood. This could be due to the common and erroneous belief that young children have not developed the capacity to work collaboratively toward a given aim. In this paper we show how small group co-located collaborative learning on a single display computer improves oral language, logical-mathematical and social skills in pre-school children. Considering that early childhood teachers have a responsibility to provide a supportive environment, teacher mediation is essential in order to achieve collaborative learning. Thus, teachers were trained in the use of the technology and strategies for effective collaborative learning. The study was implemented in 10 kindergarten classrooms with 268 children between the ages of 5 and 6 years old. A group of 5 kindergarten classrooms with equivalent characteristics participated as a comparison group. During the four-month intervention, children worked on collaborative activities at least twice a week. A quasi-experimental approach was used to assess the implementation, including pre- and post-testing. The data showed differences in the learning of oral language, logical-mathematical and social skills, with the experimental group demonstrating significantly greater achievement.

Keywords

Small group Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Co-located learning Early childhood education Single display collaborative learning 

References

  1. Astington, J. W., & Pelletier, J. (2005). Theory of mind, language, and learning in the early years: Developmental origins of school readiness. In B. D. Homer & C. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), The development of social cognition and communication (pp. 205–230). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  2. Battistich, V., & Watson, M. (2003). Fostering social development in preschool and the early elementary grades through co-operative classroom activities. In R. M. Gillies & A. F. Ashman (Eds.), Co-operative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups. London; New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  3. Bellei, C., Valenzuela, J. P., & Sevilla, A. (2009). Working conditions and teachers’ status in a market oriented educational system. The case of Chile. In 10th UKFIET International Conference on Education and Development: Politics, Policies and Progress. Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Bricker, L. J., Tanimoto, S. L., Rothenberg, A. I., Hutama, D. C., & Wong, T. H. (1995) Multiplayer activities that develop mathematical coordination. In The first international conference on Computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 32–39). Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Broadhurst, K., Paton, H., & May-Chahal, C. (2005). Children missing from school systems: Exploring divergent patterns of disengagement in the narrative accounts of parents, carers, children and young people. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(1), 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Callaghan, T., Moll, H., Rakoczy, H., Warneken, F., Liszkowski, U., Behne, T., et al. (2011). Early social cognition in three cultural contexts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 76(2), 1–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpendale, J. I. M., & Lewis, C. (2006). How children develop social understanding. In Understanding children’s worlds. Malden, MA: Oxford: Blackwell Pub.Google Scholar
  8. DeVries, R. (2002). Developing constructivist early childhood curriculum: Practical principles and activities. In Early childhood education series. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dickinson, D. K., & Neuman, S. B. (2006). Cognitive and linguistic building blocks of early literacy. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. In European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (Ed.), Advances in learning and instruction series. Amsterdam; New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  11. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.Google Scholar
  12. Earle, R. S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. Educational Technology, 42(1), 5–13.Google Scholar
  13. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fawcett, L. M., & Garton, A. F. (2005). The effect of peer collaboration on children’s problem-solving ability. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(Pt 2), 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gillies, R. M. (2006). Teachers’ and students’ verbal behaviours during cooperative and small-group learning. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(Pt 2), 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gillies, R. M., & Ashman, A. F. (1998). Behavior and interactions of children in cooperative groups in lower and middle elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 746–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamm, M., & Adams, D. (2002). Collaborative inquiry: Working toward shared goals. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 38(3), 115–118. Article.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Infante, C., Hidalgo, P., Nussbaum, M., Alarcón, R., & Gottlieb, A. (2009). Multiple mice based collaborative one-to-one learning. Computers in Education, 53(2), 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Infante, C., Weitz, J., Reyes, T., Nussbaum, M., Gomez, F., & Radovic, D. (2010). Co-located collaborative learning video game with single display groupware. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(2), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers in Education, 49(4), 1037–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1991). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Kaplan, F., Do Lenh, S., Bachour, K., Yi-ing Kao, G., Gault, C., & Dillenbourg, P. (2009). Interpersonal computers for higher education. In P. Dillenbourg, J. Huang, & M. Cherubini (Eds.), Interactive artifacts and furniture supporting collaborative work and learning, computer-supported collaborative learning series; 10. Boston, MA: Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.Google Scholar
  23. Kutnick, P., Blatchford, P., & Baines, E. (2002). Pupil groupings in primary school classrooms: Sites for learning and social pedagogy? British Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lara-Cinisomo, S., Pebley, A. R., Vaiana, M. E., & Maggio, E. (2004). Are L.A.’s children ready for school? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG145.Google Scholar
  25. Larkin, S. (2006). Collaborative group work and individual development of metacognition in the early years. Research in Science Education, 36(1), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 487–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1990). What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? In Proceedings of the 1990 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Cscw’90 (pp. 357–370). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/99332.99367.Google Scholar
  28. Matthew, K., Stephens, E., Callaway, R., Letendre, C., & Kimbell-Lopez, K. (2002). Adoption of information communication technology by teacher educators: One-on-one coaching. Journal of Information Techology for Teacher Education, 11(1), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MINEDUC, M. de E. de C. (2005). Bases Curriculares de la Educación Parvularia. Ministerio de Educación de Chile, Santiago de Chile.Google Scholar
  30. Nussbaum, M., Gomez, F., Mena, J., Alexander, P. A., Torres, A., Singer, M., et al. (2010). Technology-Supported Face-to-Face Small Group Collaborative Formative Assessment and its Integration in the Classroom. Innovations in Educational Psychology: Perspectives on Learning, Teaching and Human Development (pp. 295–323). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Nussbaum, M., Dillenbourg, P., Fischer, F., Looi, C., & Roschelle, J. (2011). How to Integrate CSCL in Classroom Life: Orchestration. The Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 2011 (Vol. 3, p. 1199). Presented at the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference, Hong-Kong: International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS).Google Scholar
  32. Paek, T., Agrawala, M., Basu, S., Drucker, S., Kristjansson, T., Logan, R., et al. (2004). Toward universal mobile interaction for shared displays. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 266–269). Chicago: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pawar, U. S., Pal, J., Gupta, R., & Toyama, K. (2007). Multiple mice for retention tasks in disadvantaged schools. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors In Computing Systems (pp. 1581–1590). San Jose: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., Burchinal, M. R., Clifford, R. M., Yazejian, N., Culkin, M. L., Howes, C., et al. (1999). The children of the cost, quality, and outcomes study go to school: Executive Summary. Chapel Hill, NC: Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Retrieved from http://fpg.unc.edu/sites/default/files/resources/reports-and-policy-briefs/NCEDL_CQO_executive_summary.pdf.
  35. Pelgrum, W. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers in Education, 37(2), 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Piercy, M., Wilton, K., & Townsend, M. (2002). Promoting the social acceptance of young children with moderate-severe intellectual disabilities using cooperative-learning techniques. American journal of mental retardation: AJMR, 107(5), 352–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rice, F. P. (2001). Human development: A life-span approach (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  38. Rogoff, B., Turkanis, C. G., & Bartlett, L. (2001). Learning together: Children and adults in a school community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Romero, M., & Lee, Y.-S. (2007). A national portrait of chronic absenteeism in the early grades. New York: National Center for Children in Poverty.Google Scholar
  40. Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., Gordin, D. N., & Means, B. M. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roschelle, J., Patton, C., & Tatar, D. (2007). Designing networked handheld devices to enhance school learning. In Advances in computers (Vol. 70, pp. 1–60). SAN DIEGO: Elsevier Science & Technology.Google Scholar
  42. Scott, S., Mandryk, R., & Inkpen, K. (2003). Understanding children’s collaborative interactions in shared environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(2), 220–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stevahn, L., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Oberle, K., & Wahl, L. (2000). Effects of conflict resolution training integrated into a kindergarten curriculum. Child Development, 71(3), 772–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stewart, J., Bederson, B. B., & Druin, A. (1999). Single display groupware: A model for co-present collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: The CHI is The Limit, Chi’99 (pp. 286–293). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/302979.303064.Google Scholar
  45. Szewkis, E., Nussbaum, M., Denard, F., Abalos, J., Rosen, T., Caballero, D., et al. (2011). Collaboration within large groups in the classroom. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 561–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tolmie, A. K., Topping, K. J., Christie, D., Donaldson, C., Howe, C., Jessiman, E., et al. (2010). Social effects of collaborative learning in primary schools. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tse, E., & Greenberg, S. (2004). Rapidly prototyping Single Display Groupware through the SDGToolkit. Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Australasian User Interface—Volume 28, AUIC’04 (pp. 101–110). Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia: Australian Computer Society, Inc.Google Scholar
  48. Tunnard, S., & Sharp, J. (2009). Children’s views of collaborative learning. Education, 37(2), 159–164. doi:10.1080/03004270802095421.Google Scholar
  49. Vasileiadou, M. (2009). Cooperative learning and its effects on pre-primary, marginalized children. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 14(4), 337–347. doi:10.1080/13632750903303179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vermette, P., Harper, L., & DiMillo, S. (2004). Cooperative & collaborative learning…with 4–8 year olds: How does research support Teachers’ practice? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(2), 130–134.Google Scholar
  51. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Chan, A., De, T., Freund, D., et al. (2008). The role of teacher instructional practices in student collaboration. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 360–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zagal, J., Rick, J., & Hsi, I. (2006). Collaborative games: Lessons learned from board games. Simulation & Gaming, 37(1), 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ziv, M., Solomon, A., & Frye, D. (2008). Young children’s recognition of the intentionality of teaching. Child Development, 79(5), 1237–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004). Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers in Education, 42(3), 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zurita, G., Nussbaum, M., & Salinas, R. (2005). Dynamic grouping in collaborative learning supported by wireless handhelds. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 149–161.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. and Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florencia Gómez
    • 2
  • Miguel Nussbaum
    • 1
  • Juan F. Weitz
    • 1
  • Ximena Lopez
    • 1
  • Javiera Mena
    • 1
  • Alex Torres
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Engineering, Computer Science DepartmentPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileSantiagoChile
  2. 2.School of EducationPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations