Analyzing group coordination when solving geometry problems with dynamic geometry software
In CSCL research, collaborative activity is conceptualized along various yet intertwined dimensions. When functioning within these multiple dimensions, participants make use of several resources, which can be social or content-related (and sometimes temporal) in nature. It is the effective coordination of these resources that appears to characterize successful collaborative activity. This study proposes a methodological approach for studying coordination of resources when solving geometry problems with dynamic geometry software. The aim is to suggest a methodological lens to capture both the content-related and social discourse within the context of geometry problem solving using dynamic geometry software. As an example, the paper also provides an analysis of a dyad’s face-to-face interaction using the suggested framework.
KeywordsCoordination Geometry problem solving Dynamic geometry software Qualitative inquiry Face-to-face collaboration
- Berkowitz, M., & Gibbs, J. (1985). The process of moral conflict resolution and moral development. In M. Berkowitz (Ed.), Peer conflict and psychological growth (pp. 71–84). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
- Cakir, M. P., Zemel, A., & Stahl, G. (2009). The joint organization of interaction within a multimodal CSCL medium. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 155–90.Google Scholar
- Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259–294.Google Scholar
- Evans, M., Feenstra, E., Ryon, E., & McNeill, D. (2011). A multimodal approach to coding discourse: Collaboration, distributed cognition, and geometric reasoning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9113-0.
- Goldenberg, E. P., & Cuoco, A. A. (1998). What is dynamic geometry? In R. Lehrer & D. Chazan (Eds.), Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space (pp. 351–68). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Jackiw, N. (2001). The geometer’s sketchpad (Version 4) [Computer software]. Berkeley: Key Curriculum Press.Google Scholar
- Jefferson, G. (1983). Notes on some orderliness of overlap onset. Tilburg papers in language and literature (No. 28). Tilburg, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Jones, K. (1998). Deductive and intuitive approaches to solving geometrical problems. In C. Mammana & V. Villani (Eds.), Perspectives on the teaching of geometry for the 21st century (pp. 78–83). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Laborde, C. (2004). The hidden role of diagrams in students’ construction of meaning in geometry. In J. Kilpatrick, C. Hoyles, & O. Skovsmose (Eds.), Meaning in mathematics education (pp. 1–21). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Lipponen, L. (2002). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (CSCL 2002). Retrieved August 22, 2012, from http://repository.maestra.net/valutazione/MaterialeSarti/articoli/Lipponen.pdf.
- Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1990). What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW 1990), pp. 357–370.Google Scholar
- Oxford University Press. (2012). oxforddictionaries.com. Oxford University Press. Retrieved July 28, 2012, from http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/coordination?q=coordination.
- Sarmiento, J. W., & Stahl, G. (2008). Extending the joint problem space: Time and sequence as essential features of knowledge building. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 08), Utrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell Press.Google Scholar
- ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis. A practical guide. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar