Patterns of kindergarten children’s social interaction with peers in the computer area
- 1.4k Downloads
- 9 Citations
Abstract
This study explored how young children interact with their peers in the computer area of a public kindergarten classroom. Children’s social interaction, as defined in this study, is the action of giving and taking information that results in children’s knowledge construction and cognitive development that can be accomplished through peer-to-peer interactions. This kind of social interaction is referred to as “Cognitively Effective Social Interaction (CESI)” in this paper. Patterns of young children’s social interaction with peers in the computer area of this classroom were discussed. Two teachers and 28 children in a full-day kindergarten classroom were observed and interviewed. The patterns of young children’s social interaction that occurred in the computer area were described as parallel play, verbal conflicts, sociable interaction, knowledge construction through positive and negative processes, and non-verbal communication.
Keywords
Social interaction Early childhood education Collaborative learning Technology integration Computer Peer interactionReferences
- Armstrong, A., & Casement, C. (2000). The child and the machine. Beltsville, MD: Robins Lane Press.Google Scholar
- Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2003). Strip mining for gold: Research and policy in educational technology-A response to “Fool’s Gold.” Educational Technology Review, 11(1), Retrieved July 25, 2004 from www.aace.org/pubs/etr/issue4/clements2.pdf.
- Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summary research on the building blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 136–163.Google Scholar
- Colker, L. J. (2011). Technology and learning: What early childhood educators have to say. Teaching Young Children, 4(3), 25–27.Google Scholar
- Cullen, T. A., & Greene, B. A. (2011). Preservice teachers’ beliefs, attitudes, and motivation about technology integration. Journal of Eduational Computing Research, 45(1), 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dillenbourg, P., & Evans, M. (2011). Interactive tabletops in education. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Elkind, D. (1985). The impact of computer use on cognitive development in young children: A theoretical analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Evans, M. A., Feenstra, E., Ryon, E., & McNeill, D. (2011). A multimodal approach to coding discourse: Collaboration, distributed cognition, and geometric reasoning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 253–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fesakis, G., Sofroniou, C., & Mavroudi, E. (2011). Using the internet for communicative learning activities in kindergarten: The case of the “Shapes Planet. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38(5), 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gelmini-Hornsby, G., Ainsworth, S., & O’Malley, C. (2011). Guided reciprocal questioning to support children’s collaborative storytelling. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 577–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gimbert, B., & Cristol, D. (2004). Teaching curriculum with technology: Enhancing children’s competence during early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 31(3), 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greiffenhagen, C. (2012). Making rounds: The routine work of the teacher during collaborative learning with computers. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(1), 11–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grey, A. (2011). Cybersafety in early childhood education. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(2), 77–81.Google Scholar
- Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Hand book of qualitative research (pp. 163–194). New Delhi: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Haugland, S. W. (2005). Selecting or upgrading software and web sites in the classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(5), 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hutinger, P., & Johanson, J. (2000). Implementing and maintaining an effective early childhood comprehensive technology system. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(3), 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hyun, E., & Davis, G. (2005). Kindergarteners’ conversations in a computer-based technology classroom. Communication Education, 54(2), 118–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Karlsson, G. (2010). Animation and grammer in science education: Learners’ construal of animated educational software. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(2), 167–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee, J. S., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2009). Early childhood teachers’ misconceptions about mathematics education for young children in the United States. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(4), 37–45.Google Scholar
- Lin, C. (2012). Application of a model for the integration of technology in kindergarten: An empirical investigation in Taiwan. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Maynard, R. (2010). Computers and young children. Canadian Children, 35(1), 15–18.Google Scholar
- McCarrick, K., & Li, X. (2007). Buried treasure: The impact of computer use on young children’s social, cognitive, language development and motivation. AACE Journal, 15(1), 73–95.Google Scholar
- Mehan, H. (1989). Microcomputers in classrooms: Educational technology or social practice? Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 20, 4–22. doi: 10.1525/aeq.1989.20.1.05x12081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- NAEYC (2012). Technology and interactive media as tools in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. p. 5.Google Scholar
- Nir-Gal, O., & Klein, P. S. (2004). Computers for cognitive development in early childhood-The teacher’s role in the computer learning environment. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 97–119.Google Scholar
- Perez-Sanagustin, M., et al. (2012). 4SPPIces: A case study of factors in a scripted collaborative-learning blended course across spatial locations. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(3). Google Scholar
- Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problemsolving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 69–97). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Siyahhan, S., Barab, S. A., & Downton, M. P. (2010). Using activity theory to understand intergenerational play: The case of Family Quest. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(3), 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Specht, J., Wood, E., & Willoughby, T. (2002). What early childhood educators need to know about computers in order to enhance the learning environment. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 28(1), 125–132.Google Scholar
- Stephen, C., & Plowman, L. (2008). Enhancing learning with information and communication technologies in pre-school. Early Childhood Development and Care, 178(6), 637–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Svensson, A. K. (2000). Computers in school: Socially isolating or a tool to promote collaboration? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(4), 437–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Swaminathan, S., & Wright, J. L. (2003). Major trends and issues in early childhood education: Challenges, controversies, and insights. NY: Teachers College.Google Scholar
- The Alliance for Childhood (2004). Tech tonic: Towards a new literacy of technology. Retrieved Feb 2, 2012 from http://www.scribd.com/doc/19264/Tech-Tonic-Towards-a-new-literacy-of-technology.
- Vernadakis, N., Avgerinos, A., Tsitskari, E., & Zachopoulou, E. (2005). The use of computer assisted instruction in preschool education: Making teaching meaningful. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(2), 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In R. Van der veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 99–174). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Wang, F., Kinzie, M., McGuire, P., & Pan, E. (2010). Applying technology to inquiry-based learning in early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(5), 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wohlwend, K. E. (2010). A is for Avatar: Young children in literacy 2.0 worlds and literacy 1.0 schools. Language Arts, 88(2), 144–152.Google Scholar
- Wolfe, S., & Flewitt, R. (2010). New technologies, new multimodal literacy practices and young children’s metacognitive development. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(4), 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yelland, N. (2011). Reconceptualising play and learning in the lives of young children. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(2), 4–12.Google Scholar
- Zevenbergen, R. (2007). Digital natives come to preschool: Implications for early childhood practice. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8(1), 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar