4SPPIces: A case study of factors in a scripted collaborative-learning blended course across spatial locations
- 544 Downloads
Computer-Supported Collaborative Blended Learning (CSCBL) scripts are complex learning situations in which formal and informal activities conducted at different spatial locations are coordinated and integrated into one unique learning setting through the use of technology. We define a conceptual model identifying four factors to be considered when addressing the design of these CSCBL scripts and of the technological system for supporting their enactment: the space, the pedagogical method, the participants and the history (4SPPIces factors). This paper presents and evaluates a CSCBL script designed according to the 4SPPIces factors. The script is proposed for extending the learning of geographic fieldwork in a geography course at a high school. In this script, students reflect about the urbanism and the socio-geographic characteristics of a Barcelona neighborhood. The script blends individual and collaborative activities supported by mobile and computer-based technologies conducted in the classroom, home and city. The script is evaluated in a case study involving thirty-four students and two teachers. The case study reports: (1) the CSCBL script designed with the teachers, considering the 4SPPIces factors and the associated technological environment and (2) the results of enacting the script in the actual learning context and analysing whether it fulfils the targeted learning objectives. The results from this case study show the impact of considering the 4SPPIces factors to enhance a real practice providing new learning and motivational benefits. The CSCBL script presented is an example that can encourage other practitioners and researchers to adopt the 4SPPices factors in similar educational situations.
KeywordsComputer supported collaborative learning script Blended learning Educational spaces Mobile learning Case study
- Adams, A., Lunt, P., & Cairns, P. (2008). A qualitative approach to HCI research. In P. Cairns & A. L. Cox (Eds.), Research methods for human-computer interaction (pp. 138–157). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Catalan High School Curriculum – Decret 142/2008. Web: http://www.gencat.cat/diari/5183/08190087.htm. Accessed 20 November 2011.
- de-la-Fuente-Valentín, L., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Santos, P., Henández-Leo, D., Pardo, A, Blat, J., & Delgado-Kloos, C. System orchestration support for a flow of blended collaborative activities. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCOS 2010), 415–420. Thessaloniki, Greece.Google Scholar
- Dillenbourg, P., & Fischer, F. (2007). Basics of computer-supported collaborative learning. Zeitschrift Für Berufs- Und Wirtschaftspadagogik, 21, 111–130.Google Scholar
- Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, J. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In P. Dillenbourg, & P. Jermann (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning. Cognitive, Computational and Educational Perspectives (pp. 275–301). US: Springer.Google Scholar
- Dimitriadis, Y., Asensio, J. I., Martínez, A., & Osuna, C. (2003). Component based software engineering and CSCL: Component identification and dimensioning. Upgrade. Digital Journal of European Professional Informatics Societies, Special Issue on e-Learning: Boarderless Education, 4(5), 21-28.Google Scholar
- Dougiamas, M., & Taylor, P. (2003). Moodle: Using learning communities to create an open source course management system. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (ED-MEDIA 2003) (pp. 171–178). Chesapeake, VA.Google Scholar
- Frechtling, J., & Sharp, L. (Eds.) (1997). In J. Frechtling, & L. Sharp (Eds.), User-friendly handbook for mixed method evaluations. US: Directorate for Education and Human Resources Division of Research, Evaluation and Communication NSF.Google Scholar
- Gahan, C., & Hannibal, M. (Eds.). (1998). Doing qualitative research using QSR NUD* IST. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- Google Spreadsheets. Web: http://www.google.com/google-d-s/spreadsheets/. Accessed 19 January 2012.
- Gregory, J. (2003). Scandinavian approaches to participatory design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(1), 62–74.Google Scholar
- Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 29(2), 75–91.Google Scholar
- Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 163–194). New Delhi: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., & Villasclaras, E. D. (2010). Pattern languages for generating CSCL scripts: From a conceptual model to the design of a real situation. In P. Goodyear & S. Retalis (Eds.), E-learning, design patterns and pattern languages (pp. 49–64). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Hernández-Leo, D., Villasclaras-Fernández, E. D., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., Ruiz-Requies, I., & Rubia-Avi, B. (2006). Collage, a Collaborative Learning Design Editor Based on Patterns. Educational, Techology & Society, 9(1), 58–71.Google Scholar
- Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2005). Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lim, K. Y. T. (2006). Pictures in place. Adolescent usage of multimedia messaging in the negotiation, construction and sharing of meaning about local environments. Thousand Oaks: Dissertation.com.Google Scholar
- Maxwell, J. A., & Loomis, D. M. (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 241–272). US: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Muller, M. J. & Kuhn, S. (1993). Participatory design. Communications of the ACM - Special issue on graphical user interfaces: The next generation, 36(6), 24–28.Google Scholar
- Oblinger, D. G. (2005). Leading the transition from classrooms to learning spaces. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 28(1), 14–18.Google Scholar
- Oblinger, D. G. (2006). Space as a change agent. In D. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces (pp. 1–4). EDUCAUSE. Web: http://www.educause.edu/learningspaces. Accessed 20 November 2011.
- Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Nieves, R., Hernández-Leo, D., & Blat, J. (2010). Representing the spaces when planning learning flows. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2010), 276–291. Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
- Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Ramirez-Gonzalez, G., Hernández-Leo, D, Muñoz-Organero, M., Santos, P., Blat, J., & Delgado Kloos C. (2012). Discovering the campus together: A mobile and computer-based learning experience. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(1),176–188.Google Scholar
- Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (Eds.). (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
- Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G., Bachmair, B. (2010). A theory of learning for the mobile age. Learning through conversation and exploration across contexts. In Ben Machmair (Ed.) Medienbildung in neuen Kulturräumen (pp. 87–99). Verlag: Springer 2010.Google Scholar
- Spikol, D., & Milrad, M. (2008). Combining physical activities and mobile games to promote novel learning practices. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (WMUTE 2008), (pp. 31–38). Beijing, China.Google Scholar
- Stake, R. E. (Ed.). (1998). The art of case study research. US/London/New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Weinberger, A., Kollar, I., Dimitriadis, Y., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., & Fischer, F. (2009). Computer-supported collaboration scripts. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 155–173). The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar