CSCL for intellectually disabled pupils: Stimulating interaction by using a floor control mechanism

  • Ulrike Cress
  • Katrin Wodzicki
  • Martina Bientzle
  • Andreas Lingnau
Article

Abstract

Computer-supported collaborative learning has an unexploited potential of becoming an effective learning method for pupils with intellectual disabilities. This paper aims at showing how some specific requirements of this target group may be met by structuring a learning situation with the help of floor control, which restricts the opportunities of a learning dyad to act simultaneously within the learning environment. It was expected that floor control could improve communication between pupils with intellectual disabilities by explicitly structuring and restricting activities in the learning environment and making it necessary for the pupils to communicate. To examine if floor control really supports the collaboration process in the hypothesized way, two different versions of a CSCL environment were implemented and compared. The results revealed improved task-related communication and a higher quality of interaction outcomes.

Keywords

CSCL Floor control Intellectual disability 

References

  1. Baird, P. A., & Sadovnik, A. D. (1985). Metal retardation in over a half-a-million consecutive live births: An epidemiological study. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 323–330.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, M. J., & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd, J. A., Jr. (1996). Floor control in synchronous groupware. Dissertation. The Ohio State University, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds: Possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cosden, M. A., Goldman, S. R., & Hine, M. S. (1990). Learning handicapped students’ interactions during a microcomputer-based group writing activity. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10, 220–232.Google Scholar
  6. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner, W. Jochems, F. Catherine, & R. Magliozzi (Eds.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.Google Scholar
  7. Doll, E. A. (1965). Vineland social maturity scale: Condensed manual of directions. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  8. Dommel, H. P., & Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J. J. (1997). Floor control for multimedia conferencing and collaboration. Multimedia Systems, 5, 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. M. (2007). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garton, A. F., & Pratt, C. (2001). Peer assistance in children’s problem solving. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haake, J. M., & Pfister, H. (2010). Scripting a distance-learning university course: Do students benefit from net-based scripted collaboration? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris, J. C. (2006). Intellectual disability: Understanding its development, causes, classification, evaluation, and treatment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Miller, N. (1992). Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Holtz, K., Eberle, G., Hillig, A., & Marker, K. R. (2005). HKI - Heidelberger Kompetenz-Inventar für geistig Behinderte (5th ed.). Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
  15. Hoppe, H. U., & Gassner, K. (2002). Integrating collaborative concept mapping tools with group memory and retrieval functions. Proceedings of CSCL 2002 (2002, Boulder, CO). In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 716–725). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hron, A., Hesse, F. W., Reinhard, P., & Picard, E. (1997). Strukturierte Kooperation beim computerunterstützten kollaborativen Lernen [Structured cooperation for computer-supported collaborative learning]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 25, 56–69.Google Scholar
  17. Hron, A., Hesse, F. W., Cress, U., & Giovis, C. (2000). Implicit and explicit dialogue structuring in virtual learning groups. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hron, A., Cress, U., Hammer, K., & Friedrich, H. F. (2006). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction in a video-based learning setting: Effects of a shared workspace and a content-specific graphical representation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 236–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44, 395–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts—a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 159–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 17, 708–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koller, H., Richardson, S. A., Katz, M., & McLaren, J. (1983). Behavior disturbance since childhood among a 5-year birth cohort of all mentally retarded young adults in a city. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 87, 386–395.Google Scholar
  23. Lingnau, A., & Bientzle, M. (2009). A technical framework to support implicit structured collaboration. In: C. O. 'Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning practices: CSCL2009 Conference Proceedings (pp. 527–531). International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS).Google Scholar
  24. Lingnau, A., Zentel, P., & Cress, U. (2007). Fostering collaborative problem solving for pupils with cognitive disabilities. In C. A. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference 2007: International Society of the Learning Sciences (pp. 447–449). New Brunswick: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  25. McDonnell, J., Thorson, N., Allen, C., & Mathot-Buckner, C. (2000). The effects of partner learning during spelling for students with severe disabilities and their peers. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. Handbook of child psychology, 2, 679–744.Google Scholar
  28. Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 201–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 421–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. Handbook of Educational Psychology, 841–873.Google Scholar
  31. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer–supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wishart, J. G., Willis, D. S., Cebula, K. R., & Pitcairn, T. K. (2007). Collaborative learning: A comparison of outcomes for typically developing and intellectually disabled children. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 112, 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.; Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulrike Cress
    • 1
  • Katrin Wodzicki
    • 1
  • Martina Bientzle
    • 1
  • Andreas Lingnau
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Knowledge Media Research CenterTübingenGermany
  2. 2.University of StrathclydeGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations