Exploring e-learners’ perceptions of net-based peer-reviewed English writing
This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of a net-based peer review process for improving Chinese adult e-learners’ English writing ability. A class of 36 students participated in this study, which lasted one school year of two semesters. Participants were divided into three groups according to their English writing abilities at the beginning of the study. They attended regular synchronous classes and took writing assignments home. The feature of this experiment is that their writings were submitted for peers’ reviews from another group. At the end of each semester, an online writing contest was organized and all the participants took part in order to examine learning outcomes. A survey at the end of the study was also conducted to obtain students’ perceptions of the process. The result of the study shows that all the participants obtained satisfactory results, but the students with lower writing ability made more progress than those with higher ability. The finding also indicates that students with higher writing ability tend to become discouraged if they are grouped with lower-ability students for too long.
KeywordsDistance education Peer review Teaching/learning strategies Pedagogical issues
- An, H., Kim, S., & Kim, B. (2008). Teacher perspectives on online collaborative learning: Factors perceived as facilitating and impeding successful online group work. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(1). Retrieved July 10, 2010 from: http://www.citejournal.org/vol8/iss4/general/article1.cfm.
- Antil, L., Jenkins, J., Wayne, S., & Vadasy, P. (1998). Cooperative learning: Prevalence, conceptualizations, and the relationship between research and practice. American Educational Research Journal, 35(3), 419–454.Google Scholar
- Beckman, M. (1990). Collaborative learning: Preparation for the workplace and democracy? College Teaching, 38(4), 128–133.Google Scholar
- Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7. Retrieved September 3, 2010 from: http://www.aahea.org/bulletins/articles/sevenprinciples1987.htm.Google Scholar
- Davis, B. G. (1993). Tools for Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Retrieved July 4, 2010 from: http://teaching.berkeley.edu/bgd/collaborative.html.Google Scholar
- Fei, H. (2006). Students’ perceptions of peer response activity in English writing instruction. Teaching English in China, 29(4), 48–52.Google Scholar
- Haythornthwaite, C., & Kazmer, M. M. (2002). Bringing the Internet home: Adult distance learners and their Internet, Home and Work worlds. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 431–463). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2004). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. H. Johanssen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 785–811). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 4, George Washington University.Google Scholar
- Keegan, D., Schwenke, E., Fritsch, H., Kenny, G., Kismihók, G., Bíró, M., et al. (2005). Virtual classrooms in educational provision: Synchronous elearning systems for European institutions. Hagen: FernUniversitaet (ZIFF). Retrieved November 20, 2010 from: http://www.fernuni-hagen.de/ZIFF/synchronous.pdf.Google Scholar
- Kruse, K. (2004), What are “Synchronous” and “Asynchronous” Training? Retrieved January 13, 2011 from: http://www.msmc.la.edu/include/learning_resources/online_course_environment/async_sync.pdf.
- Leki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margin: Issues in written response. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 57–68). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Liu, J. (1998). Peer reviews with the instructor: Seeking alternatives in ESL writing. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Teaching in action: Case studies from second language classrooms (pp. 236–240). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Google Scholar
- Liu, J., & Hansen, J. (2002). Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Mittan, R. (1989). The Peer Review Process: Harnessing Students Communicative Power. In D. M. Johnson & D. H. Roen (Eds.), Richness in Writing: Empowering SLA Students (pp. 207–219). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
- O’Dwyer, S. (2006). The English teacher as facilitator and authority. TESL-EJ, 9(4), Retrieved August 23, 2010 from: http://tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej36/a2.pdf.
- Panitz, T. (1997). Collaborative versus cooperative learning: A comparison of the two concepts which will help us understand the underlying nature of interactive learning. Retrieved July 24, 2010 from: http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED448443.pdf
- Qi, Y. (2004). The effects of teacher versus peer feedback on revision of English majors’ argumentative writing. Foreign Language Teaching Abroad, 4, 47–53.Google Scholar
- Radencich, M., & McKay, L. (Eds.). (1995). Flexible grouping for literacy in the elementary grades. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Slavin, R. E. (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57(3), 293–336.Google Scholar
- Smith, B. L., & MacGregor, J. T. (1992). What Is Collaborative Learning? In A. S. Goodsell, M. R. Maher, V. Tinto, B. L. Smith, & J. MacGregor (Eds.), Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education (pp. 9–22). University Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, Pennsylvania State University. Retrieved August 5, 2010 from: http://learningcommons.evergreen.edu/pdf/collab.pdf.Google Scholar
- Webb, N. M., Nemer, K., Chizhik, A., & Sugrue, B. (1998). Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: Group composition and performance. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 607–651.Google Scholar
- Xu, Y. (2000). Case study on impact of peer revision on writing. Journal of F.A.C, (4), 86-89.Google Scholar
- Zhang, S. (2008). Assessing the impact of peer revision on English on English writing of tertiary EFL learners. Teaching English in China, 31(2), 47–54.Google Scholar