The collaborative construction of chronotopes during computer-supported collaborative professional tasks
- 310 Downloads
In this paper, we use the concept of chronotope to analyse the co-construction of spatial and temporal frameworks during collaborative interaction. A chronotope is a genre of movement or pacing in the space that participants adopt over the temporal duration of an activity. We look in particular at the conjunction point of time and space as revealing how collaboration works and what role is played by technology. Six sessions during which 10 teachers prepared a pedagogical scenario to be implemented in school were filmed and qualitatively analysed. The tempo of the activity was found to vary considerably depending on various factors, such as the features of the tools used, the aims of the activity, and the skills employed by the participants to achieve them. Three different tempos were identified, which we named, using a musical metaphor, Adagio, Andante, and Allegretto. Some representative excerpts of each of these tempos, and of the moving from one tempo to another, are selected and discussed. Our results allow an in-depth understanding of coordination within a group of teachers working on planning a common educational scenario for their classrooms with the mediation of a software tool.
KeywordsChronotope Heterotopia Teachers Video analysis Socio-constructivism Bakhtin Software supporting face-to-face interaction
- Avouris, N., Komis, V., Margaritis, M., & Fidas, C. (2004). Modeling space: A tool for synchronous collaborative problem solving. In ED-MEDIA’ 04, 16th World Conference on Educational Multimedia & Telecommunications (pp. 381–386). AACE Press.Google Scholar
- Backtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
- Bateson, G. (1987). Steps to an ecology of mind. Northvale, New Jersey: Jason Aronson Inc.Google Scholar
- Boje, D. M. (2007). What is chronotopic strategy stories? In D. M. Boje (Ed.), Storytelling organization (pp. 138–154). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (Eds.). (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1967). Of other spaces, heterotopias. http://foucault.info/documents/heteroTopia/foucault.heteroTopia.en.html.
- Harrison, S., & Dourish, P. (1996). Re-place-ing space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Boston, Massachusetts, United States, pp. 67–76.Google Scholar
- Heidegger, M. (1927/1996). Being and time: A translation of Sein und Zeit (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
- Jefferson, G. (1984). Transcript notation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. ix–xvi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Koschmann, T. (1999). Toward a dialogic theory of learning: Bakhtin’s contribution tolearning in settings of collaboration. Paper presented at the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL ‘99), Palo Alto, CA. Proceedings pp. 308–313. Retrieved from http://kn.cilt.org/cscl99/A38/A38.HTM.
- Lemke, J. L. (2004). Learning across multiple places and their chronotopes. Contribution at the symposium: Spaces and boundaries of learning (http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jaylemke/papers/aera_2004.htm).
- Ligorio, M. B., Cesareni, D., & Schwartz, N. (2008). Collaborative virtual environments as means to increase the level of intersubjectivity in a distributed cognition system. Journal of Research on Technology in Education (JRTE), 40(3), 339–358.Google Scholar
- Ligorio, M. B., Andriessen, J., Baker, M., Knoller, N., Klonyguy, M., & Tateo, L. (Eds.). (2009). Talking over the computer: Pedagogical scenarios to blend computers and face to face interaction. Naples: Scriptaweb.Google Scholar
- Muhlpfordt, M., & Wessner, M. (2005). Explicit referencing in chat supports collaborative learning. Paper presented at the International Conference on CSCL, Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
- Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2004). Thinking spaces of the young. In A.-N. Perret-Clermont et al. (Eds.), Joining society. Social interaction and learning in adolescence and youth (pp. 3–10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (Ed.). (2006). Thinking time. Seattle: Hogrefe Publishers.Google Scholar
- Sarmiento, J., & Stahl, G. (2008). Extending the joint problem space: Time and sequence as essential features of knowledge building. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2008), Utrecht, Netherlands. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/pub/icls2008johann.pdf.
- Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75–119). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Soller, A., & Lesgold, A. (2003). A computational approach to analyzing online knowledge sharing interaction. Paper presented at the Artificial Intelligence in Education, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
- Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar