Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The collaborative construction of chronotopes during computer-supported collaborative professional tasks

Abstract

In this paper, we use the concept of chronotope to analyse the co-construction of spatial and temporal frameworks during collaborative interaction. A chronotope is a genre of movement or pacing in the space that participants adopt over the temporal duration of an activity. We look in particular at the conjunction point of time and space as revealing how collaboration works and what role is played by technology. Six sessions during which 10 teachers prepared a pedagogical scenario to be implemented in school were filmed and qualitatively analysed. The tempo of the activity was found to vary considerably depending on various factors, such as the features of the tools used, the aims of the activity, and the skills employed by the participants to achieve them. Three different tempos were identified, which we named, using a musical metaphor, Adagio, Andante, and Allegretto. Some representative excerpts of each of these tempos, and of the moving from one tempo to another, are selected and discussed. Our results allow an in-depth understanding of coordination within a group of teachers working on planning a common educational scenario for their classrooms with the mediation of a software tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Avouris, N., Komis, V., Margaritis, M., & Fidas, C. (2004). Modeling space: A tool for synchronous collaborative problem solving. In ED-MEDIA’ 04, 16th World Conference on Educational Multimedia & Telecommunications (pp. 381–386). AACE Press.

  2. Backtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.

  3. Baker, M., & Lundt, K. (1997). Promoting reflecting interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 175–193.

  4. Bateson, G. (1987). Steps to an ecology of mind. Northvale, New Jersey: Jason Aronson Inc.

  5. Boje, D. M. (2007). What is chronotopic strategy stories? In D. M. Boje (Ed.), Storytelling organization (pp. 138–154). London: Sage.

  6. Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  7. Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  8. Dillenbourg, P., & Traum, D. (2006). Sharing solutions: Persistence and grounding in multimodal collaborative problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 121–151.

  9. Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (Eds.). (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  10. Dewiyanti, S., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Jochems, W. (2007). Students’ experiences with collaborative learning in asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 496–514.

  11. Foucault, M. (1967). Of other spaces, heterotopias. http://foucault.info/documents/heteroTopia/foucault.heteroTopia.en.html.

  12. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.

  13. Goodwin, C. (2000). Practices of color classification. Mind, culture, and activity, 7(1 & 2), 19–36.

  14. Harrison, S., & Dourish, P. (1996). Re-place-ing space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Boston, Massachusetts, United States, pp. 67–76.

  15. Heidegger, M. (1927/1996). Being and time: A translation of Sein und Zeit (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). Albany: SUNY.

  16. Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 174–196.

  17. Jefferson, G. (1984). Transcript notation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. ix–xvi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  18. Kirsh, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 31–68.

  19. Koschmann, T. (1999). Toward a dialogic theory of learning: Bakhtin’s contribution tolearning in settings of collaboration. Paper presented at the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL ‘99), Palo Alto, CA. Proceedings pp. 308–313. Retrieved from http://kn.cilt.org/cscl99/A38/A38.HTM.

  20. Lemke, J. L. (2004). Learning across multiple places and their chronotopes. Contribution at the symposium: Spaces and boundaries of learning (http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jaylemke/papers/aera_2004.htm).

  21. Ligorio, M. B. (2001). Integrating communication formats: Synchronous versus asynchronous and text-based versus visual. Computers & Education, 37(2), 103–125.

  22. Ligorio, M. B., Cesareni, D., & Schwartz, N. (2008). Collaborative virtual environments as means to increase the level of intersubjectivity in a distributed cognition system. Journal of Research on Technology in Education (JRTE), 40(3), 339–358.

  23. Ligorio, M. B., Andriessen, J., Baker, M., Knoller, N., Klonyguy, M., & Tateo, L. (Eds.). (2009). Talking over the computer: Pedagogical scenarios to blend computers and face to face interaction. Naples: Scriptaweb.

  24. Matusov, E. (2001). Intersubjectivity of a way of informing teaching design for a community of learners class. Teaching and Teachers Education, 17, 383–402.

  25. McGrath, J. E., & Tschan, F. (2004). Temporal matters in social psychology: Examining the role of time in the lives of groups and individuals. Washington: American Psychological Association.

  26. Muhlpfordt, M., & Wessner, M. (2005). Explicit referencing in chat supports collaborative learning. Paper presented at the International Conference on CSCL, Taipei, Taiwan.

  27. Overdijk, M., & van Diggelen, W. (2008). Appropriation of a shared workspace: Organizing principles and their application. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 165–192.

  28. Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2004). Thinking spaces of the young. In A.-N. Perret-Clermont et al. (Eds.), Joining society. Social interaction and learning in adolescence and youth (pp. 3–10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  29. Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (Ed.). (2006). Thinking time. Seattle: Hogrefe Publishers.

  30. Sarmiento, J., & Stahl, G. (2008). Extending the joint problem space: Time and sequence as essential features of knowledge building. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2008), Utrecht, Netherlands. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/pub/icls2008johann.pdf.

  31. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.

  32. Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75–119). New York: Free Press.

  33. Soller, A., & Lesgold, A. (2003). A computational approach to analyzing online knowledge sharing interaction. Paper presented at the Artificial Intelligence in Education, Sydney, Australia.

  34. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  35. Stahl, G. (2009). Studying virtual math teams. New York: Springer.

  36. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  37. Trausan-Matu, S., Stahl, G., & Sarmiento, G. (2007). Supporting polyphonic collaborative learning. E-service Journal, 6(1), 58–74.

  38. Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic, educational and technology: Expanding the space of learning. New York: Springer.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Maria Beatrice Ligorio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ligorio, M.B., Ritella, G. The collaborative construction of chronotopes during computer-supported collaborative professional tasks. Computer Supported Learning 5, 433–452 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-010-9094-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Chronotope
  • Heterotopia
  • Teachers
  • Video analysis
  • Socio-constructivism
  • Bakhtin
  • Software supporting face-to-face interaction