Advertisement

Revealing preconditions for trustful collaboration in CSCL

  • Anne Gerdes
Article
First Online:

Abstract

This paper analyses preconditions for trust in virtual learning environments. The concept of trust is discussed with reference to cases reporting trust in cyberspace and through a philosophical clarification holding that trust in the form of self-surrender is a common characteristic of all human co-existence. In virtual learning environments, self-surrender might fail, due to a setting that affords strategic communication and impression management. To obtain the kind of unconditional commitment necessary for learning, one might benefit from the insights from open-source communities, in which self-articulation of goals and volunteerism promote productivity. Balancing free will in connection with study initiatives with inquiry teaching methods might encourage a practice which favours mastery-oriented learning strategies and the seeking of knowledge for its own sake.

Keywords

Trustful collaboration Learning strategies Self-surrender Reflection 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arendt, H. (1973). Remarks by Hannah Arendt, Advisory Council, Princeton University, Princeton.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle, transl. by L. H. G. Greenwood (1909). Nicomachean ethics. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, R. (2007). A will to learn: Being a student in an age of uncertainty. Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons-based peer production and virtue. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(4), 394–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Laat, P. B. (2005). Trusting virtual trust. Ethics and Information Technology, 7, 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Introduction: What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning—cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  7. Fontaine, G. (2002). Presence in “Teleland”. In K. Rudestam & J. Schoenholtz-Read (Eds.), A handbook on teaching in the virtual classroom: A guide to excellence in online education (pp. 29–53). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Gadamer, H. G. (1993). Truth and method. London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
  9. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  10. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J.-W., Kreijns, K., & Beers, P. J. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 52(3), 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kling, R., & Courtright, C. (2004). Group behaviour and learning in electronic formus: A socio-technical approach. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 91–120). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Land, R., & Bayne, S. (2005). Screen or monitor? Issues of surveillance and disciplinary power in online learning environments. In R. Land & S. Bayne (Eds.), Education in cyberspace (pp. 165–179). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  14. Levey, M. D. (2007). No time to think: Reflections on information technology and contemplative scholarship. Ethics and Information Technology, 9, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power: Two works. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Løgstrup, K. E. (1997). The ethical demand. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  17. MacIntyre, A. (1999). After virtue. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  18. Pettit, P. (2004). Trust, reliance and the Internet. Analyse und Kritik, 26, 108–121.Google Scholar
  19. Platon, transl. with notes by C. C. W. Taylor (1991). Protagoras. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  20. Salmon, G. (2005). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  21. Sherry, L. (2000). The nature and purpose of online conversations: A brief synthesis of current research. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6(1), 19–52.Google Scholar
  22. Sorensen, E. (2002). Distributed CSCL—a situated, collaborative tapestry. In L. Dircknick-Holmfeld & B. Fibiger (Eds.), Learning in virtual environments (pp. 165–192). Gylling: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.; Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Business Communication and Information ScienceUniversity of Southern DenmarkKoldingDenmark

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options