Distributed leadership in online groups

Article

Abstract

We conducted research within a program serving future mathematics and science teachers. Groups of teachers worked primarily online in an asynchronous discussion environment on a 6-week task in which they applied learning-science ideas acquired from an educational psychology course to design interdisciplinary instructional units. We employed an adapted coding system to determine that group leadership was highly distributed among participants. We illustrated that leadership emerged through different forms of participation described in this paper and that, in some cases, individuals specialized in specific leadership roles within groups. Findings helped validate the theoretical concept of group cognition and led us to suggest an approach to online asynchronous learning for college students that depends more on students’ emergent leadership skills than on prescriptive assignment or scripting of participant roles.

Keywords

Group cognition Leadership Online collaboration Problem-based learning 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This material was partly supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0107032 (ROLE).

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Research Association.

References

  1. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chemers, M. M. (2000). Leadership research and theory: A functional integration. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chi, M. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.Google Scholar
  5. Derry, S. J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Feltovich, J., Nagarajan, A., Chernobilsky, E., & Halfpap, B. (2005). Making a mesh of it: A STELLAR approach to teacher professional development. In T. Koschmann, D. D. Suthers, & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2005, Taipei, Taiwan (pp. 105–114). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Eby, L. T., Cader, K., & Noble, C. L. (2003). Why do high self-monitors emerge as leaders in small groups? A comparative analysis of the behaviors of high versus low self-monitors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(4), 1457–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Firestone, W. A. (1993). Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 22(4), 16–23.Google Scholar
  9. George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. London: MIT.Google Scholar
  10. Halpin, A. W., & Winer, B. J. (1957). A factorial study of the leadership behavior descriptions. In R. M. Stogdill & A. E. Coons (Eds.), Leadership behavior: Its description and measurement. Columbus: Ohio State University Bureau of Business Research, Monograph No. 88.Google Scholar
  11. Hare, L., & O’Neill, K. (2000). Effectiveness and efficiency in small academic peer groups: A group study. Small Group Research, 31(1), 24–53.Google Scholar
  12. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Katic, E., Nagarajan, A., & Chernobilsky, E. (2007). Soft leaders, hard artifacts and the groups we rarely see: Using video to understand peer learning processes. In S. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 255–270). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Hollander, E. P. (1978). Leadership dynamics: A practical guide to effective relationships. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  14. Kim, I., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., & Archodidou, A. (2007). Discourse patterns during children’s collaborative online discussions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 333–370.Google Scholar
  15. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124.Google Scholar
  16. Kumpulainen, M., & Mutanen, M. (1999). The situated dynamics of peer group interaction: An introduction to an analytic framework. Learning and Instruction, 9(5), 449–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, Y., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Dong, T., Archodidou, A., Kim, I., et al. (2007). Emergent leadership in children’s discussion groups. Cognition and Instruction, 25(1), 75–111.Google Scholar
  18. Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Harding, F. D., Jacobs, T. O., & Fleishman, E. A. (2000). Leadership skills for a changing world: Solving complex social problems. Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 11–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Northouse, P. G. (2007). Leadership: Theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. O’Donnell, A. M., Reeve, J., & Smith, J. K. (2007). Educational psychology: Reflection for action (pp. 386–421). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Scholz, R. W., & Tietje, O. (2002). Embedded case study methods. Integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Scribner, J. P., Sawyer, R. K., Watson, S. T., & Myers, V. L. (2007). Teacher teams and distributed leadership: A study of group discourse and collaboration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 67–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  25. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Steinkuehler, C. A., Derry, S. J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Delmarcelle, M. (2002). Cracking the resource nut with distributed problem-based learning in secondary teacher education. Distance Education, 23(1), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design: Expanded (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.; Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Wisconsin, MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations