A connective ethnography of peer knowledge sharing and diffusion in a tween virtual world
Prior studies have shown how knowledge diffusion occurs in classrooms and structured small groups around assigned tasks yet have not begun to account for widespread knowledge sharing in more native, unstructured group settings found in online games and virtual worlds. In this paper, we describe and analyze how an insider gaming practice spread across a group of tween players ages 9–12 years in an after-school gaming club that simultaneously participated in a virtual world called Whyville.net. In order to understand how this practice proliferated, we followed the club members as they interacted with each other and members of the virtual world at large. Employing connective ethnography to trace the movements in learning and teaching this practice, we coordinated data records from videos, tracking data, field notes, and interviews. We found that club members took advantage of the different spaces, people, and times available to them across Whyville, the club, and even home and classroom spaces. By using an insider gaming practice, namely teleporting, rather than the more traditional individual person as our analytical lens, we were able to examine knowledge sharing and diffusion across the gaming spaces, including events in local small groups as well as encounters in the virtual world. In the discussion, we address methodological issues and design implications of our findings.
KeywordsVirtual worlds Knowledge sharing Knowledge diffusion Connective ethnography Peer pedagogy
The writing of this paper was supported by a grant of the National Science Foundation (NSF-0411814) to the second author. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of NSF or the University of California. We wish to thank Linda Kao for documenting club activities in field notes and Tina Tom for help logging the video data. Many thanks also to Melissa Cook, Maria Quintero, Michael Giang, David Feldon, and the LTRG research group at UCLA for comments on earlier drafts of this paper.
- Barnes, B. (2007). Disney acquires web site for children. New York Times. Retrieved August 2, 2007, from http://www.nytimes.com. August 2.
- Beavis, C., Nixon, H., & Atkinson, S. (2005). LAN cafes: Cafes, places of gathering, or sites if informal teaching and learning? Education, Communication, Information, 5(1), 41–60.Google Scholar
- Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–290). Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
- Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Ching, C. C., & Kafai, Y. B. (2008). Peer pedagogy: student collaboration and reflection in a learning through design project. Teachers College Press. Retrieved June 17, 2008, from http://tcrecord.org.
- Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2007). MUVEs as a powerful means to study situated learning. In C. Chinn, G. Erkins, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), The proceedings of CSCL 2007: Of mice, minds and society. New Brunswick, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
- Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1995). Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 99–120.Google Scholar
- Dede, C., Nelson, B., Ketelhut, D. J., Clarke, J., & Bowman, C. (2004). Design-based research strategies for studying situated learning in a multi-user virtual environment. In Y. B. Kafai, W. A. Sandoval, N. Enyedy, A. S. Nixon, & F. Herrera (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth international conference of the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y. (2008). From design experiments to formative interventions. In V. Jonker, A. Lazonder, & C. Hoadley (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighth international conference of the learning sciences. Utrecht, Netherlands: University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
- Fields, D. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2007). Stealing from Grandma or generating knowledge: Contestations and effects of cheats in a tween virtual world. In A. Baba (Ed.), Situated play: Proceedings of the third international conference of the digital games research association (DiGRA) (pp. 194–202). Tokyo, Japan: The University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
- Fields, D. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2008). Knowing and throwing mudballs, hearts, pies, and flowers: A connective ethnography of gaming practices. In V. Jonker, A. Lazonder, & C. Hoadley (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighth international conference of the learning sciences. Utrecht, Netherlands: University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
- Goodwin, M. H. (2006). Hidden lives of girls: Games of stance, status and exclusion. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
- Jones, R. (2004). The problem of context in computer mediated communication. In P. LeVine, & R. Scollon (Eds.), Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis (pp. 20–23). Washington D. C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
- Kafai, Y. B. (2008). Gender play in a tween gaming club. In Y. B. Kafai, C. Heeter, J. Denner, & J. Sun (Eds.), Beyond Barbie and Mortal Kombat (pp. 111–124). Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
- Kafai, Y. B., Feldon, D., Fields, D. A., Giang, M., & Quintero, M. (2007). Life in the time of Whypox: A virtual epidemic as a community event. In C. Steinfield, B. Pentland, M. Ackerman, & N. Contractor (Eds.), Communities and technologies 2007 (pp. 171–190). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Kafai, Y. B., & Giang, M. (2008). Virtual playgrounds. In T. Willoughby, & E. Wood (Eds.), Children’s learning in a digital world (pp. 196–217). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Kim, I.-H., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., & Archodidou, A. (2007). Discourse patterns during children’s collaborative online discussions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 333–370.Google Scholar
- Lam, W. S. E. (2004). Border discourses and identities in transnational youth culture. In J. Mahiri (Ed.), What they don’t learn in school: Literacy in the lives of urban youth (pp. 79–97). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Clarendon: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning and legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Leander, K. M. (2008). Toward a connective ethnography of online/offline literacy networks. In D. Leu, J. Cairo, M. Knobel, & C. Lankshear (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 33–65). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Lin, H. (2008). A cultural geography of gaming experiences in homes, cybercafés and dormitories. In Y. B. Kafai, C. Heeter, J. Denner, & J. Sun (Eds.), Beyond Barbie and Mortal Kombat (pp. 67–82). Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
- Lindtner, S., Nardi, B., Wang, Y., Mainwaring, S., Jing, H., Liang, W. (2008). A hybrid cultural ecology: World of Warcraft in China. Proceedings of CSCW. San Diego, California.Google Scholar
- Nardi, B. A., Ly, S., & Harris, J. (2007). Learning conversation in World of Warcraft. Proceedings, HICSS.Google Scholar
- Phaire, C. B., Cady, D., Hommel, M., Jarrett, K., Robbins, T., & Chamberlain, B. (2008). Games and learning in practice: An educator panel on implementing curricula. Madison, WI: Symposium presented at the annual conference of Games + Learning + Society 4.0 July.Google Scholar
- Roth, W.-M. (1996). Knowledge diffusion in a grade 4–5 classroom during a unit on civil engineering: An analysis of a classroom community in terms of its changing resources and practices. Cognition and Instruction, 4(2), 179–220.Google Scholar
- Steinkuehler, C. A., Duncan, S. C., & Simkins, D. W. (2007). Massively multiplayer online games & education: An outline of research. In C. Chinn, G. Erkins, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), The proceedings of CSCL 2007: Of mice, men and society (pp. 674–684). New Brunswick, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
- Stevens, R., Satwicz, T., & McCarthy, L. (2008). In-game, in-room, in-world: Reconnecting video game play to the rest of kids’ lives. In K. Salen (Ed.), Ecology of games: MacArthur foundation series on digital media and learning (pp. 41–66). Cambridge, MA: The MIT.Google Scholar
- Swalwell, M. (2003). Multi-player computer gaming: ‘Better than playing (PC Games). Reconstruction: Studies in Contemporary Culture 3(4). Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://reconstruction.eserver.org/034/swalwell.htm.
- Taylor, T. L. (2006). Play between worlds. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar