The right tool for the wrong task? Match and mismatch between first and second stimulus in double stimulation

Article

Abstract

Using Vygotsky’s notion of double stimulation as an analytical tool, we discuss the complex relationship between tasks, tools, and agency in CSCL environments. Empirically we examine how learners in a Norwegian senior high school class learning English as a foreign language approach and respond to an open-ended and collectively oriented task using a wiki. Our findings show that collectively oriented knowledge and language production takes place locally in small groups as well as in the larger collective of the class, and that learners find it difficult to maintain awareness of both levels of activity. However, when facing a breakdown in the wiki application, learners sustained strategies that carried many of the characteristics of collective production. We argue that there is a need to further theorize the task-tool relationship in activities involving collective knowledge production and that we need to align pedagogical as well as technological designs in order to give support for such efforts.

Keywords

Double stimulation Wiki Tasks Collaborative knowledge construction 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The writing of this article is supported by the strategic research effort Competence and Media Convergence (CMC) and the “TWEAK” (Tweaking Wikis for Education and Knowledge Advancement) project at the University of Oslo. We thank the learners and teacher at the Secondary School we report from, Ole Smørdal and Thomas Drevon for their design work and productive discussions, Sten Ludvigsen, Svein Olav Norenes, colleagues at InterMedia, and David Middleton for reading and commenting on earlier versions of this paper. Also, we would like to extend our thanks to the reviewers and the editors for the very constructive comments.

References

  1. Andriessen, J., Baker, M., Suthers, D. D. (Eds.). (2003). Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  2. Arnseth, H. C., & Ludvigsen, S. (2006). Approaching institutional contexts: Systemic versus dialogic research in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 1(2), 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  4. Arvaja, M. (2007). Contextual perspective in analysing collaborative knowledge construction of two small groups in web-based discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 2(2–3), 133–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Augar, N., Raitman, R., & Zhou, W. (2004). Teaching and learning online with wikis. Paper presented at the Beyond the Comfort Zone, ASCILITE Conference, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar
  6. Bakhtin, M. M. (1979/2000). The dialogic imagination. Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Bergquist, K. (1990). Doing schoolwork. Task premises and joint activity in the comprehensive classroom. Linköping: Linköping University, Department of Communication Studies.Google Scholar
  9. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap.Google Scholar
  10. Coughlan, P., & Duff, P. A. (1994). Same task, different activities: Analysis of SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In J. P. Lantolf, & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 173–193). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  11. Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  12. de Jong, T., & Jules, P. (2005). The design of powerful learning environments. In P. A. Alexander, & A. P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed.). London: LEA.Google Scholar
  13. Désilets, A., Paquet, S., & Vinson, N. G. (2005). Are wikis usable? Paper presented at the WikiSym’05, San Diego, CA, October 16–18.Google Scholar
  14. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Overscripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  15. Engeström, Y. (1999). Learning, working, and imagining. Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.Google Scholar
  16. Engeström, Y. (2007). Putting Vygotsky to work: The change laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 363–382). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2006). From wikipedia to the classroom: Exploring online publication and learning. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
  18. Gallego, M. A., & Cole, M. (2001). Classroom culture and culture in classroom. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Fourth Edition of the handbook of research on teaching. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  19. Garza, S. L., & Hern, T. (2006). Using wikis as collaborative writing tools: Something wiki this way comes—or not! Retrieved August 8, 2006, from http://critical.tamucc.edu/wiki/WikiArticle/Home.
  20. Grant, L. (2006). Using wikis in schools: A case study. Retrieved June 5, 2006, from http://www.futurelab.org.uk/research/discuss/05discuss01.htm.
  21. Hampel, R. (2006). Rethinking task design for the digital age: a framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL, 18(1), 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lankshear, C., Snyder, I., & Green, B. (2000). Teachers and technoliteracy: Managing literacy, technology and learning in schools. St Leonards, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  23. Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture and Activity, 7(4), 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leuf, B., & Cunningham, W. (2001). The wiki way: Quick collaboration on the web. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue. Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Ludvigsen, S. (2008). What counts as knowledge: Learning to use categories in computer environments. In R. Säljö (Ed.), ICT and transformation of learning practices. Oxford: Pergamon (in press).Google Scholar
  27. Lund, A. (2004). The teacher as interface. Teachers of EFL in ICT-rich environments: Beliefs, practices, appropriation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  28. Lund, A. (2006). WIKI i klasserommet: Individuelle og kollektive praksiser [WIKI in the classroom: Individual and collective practices]. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 90(4), 274–288.Google Scholar
  29. Lund, A. (2008). Wikis: a collective approach to language production. ReCALL, 20(1), 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lund, A., & Smørdal, O. (2006). Is there a space for the teacher in a wiki? In Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on Wikis (WikiSym ‘06) (pp. 37–46). Odense, Denmark: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ministry of Education and Research. (2006). Knowledge promotion. Retrieved June 02, 2007, from http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/kd/Selected-topics/andre/Knowledge-Promotion.html?id=1411.
  34. Muukkonen, H., Hakkarainen, K., & Lakkala, M. (1999). Collaborative technology for facilitating progressive inquiry: Future learning environment tools. In C. Hoadley, & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Designing new media for a new millennium. Proceedings of CSCL 1999. CA, USA: Palo Alto.Google Scholar
  35. Nespor, J. (1987). Academic tasks in a high school English class. Curriculum Inquiry, 17, 203–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1984). Social constrains in laboratory and classroom tasks. In B. Rogoff, & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition. Development in social context (pp. 172–193). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1997). The big picture: Language and learning in hundreds of English lessons. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), Opening dialogue. Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom (pp. 30–74). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  39. O’Neil, H. F., Chuang, S.-H., & Chung, G. K. W. K. (2003). Issues in the computer-based assessment of collaborative problem solving. Assessment in Education, 10(3), 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between Internet-savvy students and their schools. Retrieved September 14, 2005, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Schools_Internet_Report.pdf.
  41. Portes, P. R., Smith, T. L., Zady, M. F., & Del Castillo, K. (1997). Extending the double stimulation method in cultural-historical research: Parent–child interaction and cognitive change. Mind, Culture and Activity, 4(2), 108–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rasmussen, I. (2005). Project work and ICT: Studying learning as participation trajectories. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo, Oslo.Google Scholar
  43. Rasmussen, I., Krange, I., & Ludvigsen, S. R. (2003). The process of understanding the task: How is agency distributed between students, teachers and representations in technology-rich learning environments? International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 839–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools. A sociocultural perspective on the human-technology link. In K. Littleton, & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers. Analysing productive interaction (pp. 144–161). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Säljö, R. (2000). Lärandet i praktiken. Ett sociokulturellt perspektiv [Learning in Practice: A sociocultural perspective]. Stockholm, SE: Prisma.Google Scholar
  46. Sawyer, R. K., & Berson, S. (2004). Study group discourse: how external representations affect collaborative conversation. Linguistics and Education, 15, 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Saxe, G. B. (2006). Methods and techniques for studying the travel of ideas in classroom communities. Retrieved September 17, 2007, from http://escalate.org.il/construction_knowledge/papers/saxe.pdf.
  48. Scaletta, K. (2006, July 28, 2006). Teaching with Wikis. Retrieved August 9, 2006, from https://wiki.umn.edu/twiki/bin/view/TeachingWithWikis/WebHome.
  49. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
  50. Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  52. Strijbos, J. W., Kirschner, P. A., & Martens, R. L. (2004). What We Know About CSCL...and what we do not (but need to) know about CSCL. In J.-W. Strijbos, P. Kirschner, & R. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education (pp. 245–259). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning-making: a research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 1(3), 315–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tabak, I. (2004). Reconstructing context: negotiating the tension between exogenous and endogenous educational design. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Valsiner, J., & van der Veer, R. (2000). The social mind: Construction of the idea. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. van Dijk, T. A. (1997). The study of discourse. In T. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as structure and process (vol. 1, pp. 1–34). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  59. Wang, H.-C., Lu, C.-H., Yang, J.-Y., Hu, H.-W., Chiou, G.-F., Chiang, Y.-T., et al. (2005). An empirical exploration of using wiki in an English as a second language course. Paper presented at the 5th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Kaohsiung, Taiwan, July.Google Scholar
  60. Wasson, B., & Ludvigsen, S. (2003). Designing for knowledge building (no. 19). Oslo, NO: Forsknings–og kompetansesenteret for IT i utdanning, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  61. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.; Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.InterMediaUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations