Supporting controversial CSCL discussions with augmented group awareness tools

  • Jürgen BuderEmail author
  • Daniel Bodemer


This paper describes the development of augmented group awareness tools that take mutual user ratings of their online discussion contributions as input, aggregate these data, and visually feed these data back to the members in real time, thereby informing participants about how the group as a whole perceives their contributions. A specific group awareness tool was experimentally tested in a CSCL scenario using online controversies about a physics domain. The learning material was distributed across group members to create a situation where an individual minority member with a scientifically correct viewpoint faces a majority favoring a plausible, but incorrect viewpoint. It was hypothesized that in unsupported CSCL groups an incorrect majority would dominate a correct minority, whereas in groups that were supported by an augmented group awareness tool minority influence could be strengthened by making minority contributions salient. The paper reports results in support of this hypothesis, and discusses the mechanisms leading to the benefits of group awareness tools for collaborative learning.


Awareness Social influence Social navigation 


  1. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70 (whole no. 416).Google Scholar
  2. Baker, M. J. (1994). A model for negotiation in teaching–learning dialogues. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5, 199–254.Google Scholar
  3. Bazerman, M. H., Curhan, J. R., Moore, D. A., & Valley, K. L. (2000). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 279–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brodbeck, F., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., Frey, D., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2002). The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: The effects of pre-discussion dissent. The European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll, J. M., Neale, D. C., Isenhour, P. L., Rosson, M. B., & McCrickard, D. S. (2003). Notification and awareness: Synchronizing task-oriented collaborative activity. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 58(5), 605–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christiansen, N., & Maglaughlin, K. (2003). Crossing from physical workspace to virtual workspace: Be AWARE!. In D. Harris (Ed.) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction (pp. 1128–1132). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1–35.Google Scholar
  8. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational influence upon individual judgement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Overscripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. Kirschner (Ed.) Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit.Google Scholar
  10. Doise, W., & Mugny, C. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  11. Endsley, M. (1995). Towards a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 32–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gross, T., Stary, C., & Totter, A. (2005). User-centered awareness in computer-supported cooperative work-systems: Structured embedding of findings from social sciences. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 18, 323–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2002). A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real-time groupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 411–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hastie, R., Penrod, S. D., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Höök, K., Benyon, D., & Munro, A. (Eds.) (2002). Designing information spaces: The social navigation approach. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Kanselaar, G. (2007). Visualization of agreement and discussion processes during computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1105–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1979). Conflict in the classroom: Controversy and learning. Review of Educational Research, 49, 51–61.Google Scholar
  18. Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2008). Group awareness and self-presentation in computer-supported information exchange. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2002). Collaborative filtering: Supporting social navigation in large, crowded infospaces. In K. Höök, D. Benyon, & A. Munro (Eds.) Designing information spaces: The social navigation approach (pp. 43–82). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 5, 8–22.Google Scholar
  21. Lim, L.-H., & Benbasat, I. (1993). A theoretical perspective on negotiation support systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9, 27–44.Google Scholar
  22. Linn, M., & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, and peers: Science learning partners. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Martin, R., Hewstone, M., & Martin, P. Y. (2007). Systematic and heuristic processing of majority- and minority-endorsed messages: The effects of varying outcome relevance and levels of orientation on attitude and message processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McLeod, P., Baron, R. S., Marti, M. W., & Yoon, K. (1997). The eyes have it: Minority influence in face to face and computer mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 706–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic.Google Scholar
  26. Roschelle, J. (1996). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. In T. Koschmann (Ed.) CSCL, Theory and practice of an emergent paradigm (pp. 209–248). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Soller, A., Martinez, A., Jermann, P., & Muehlenbrock, M. (2005). From mirroring to guiding: A review of state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 261–290.Google Scholar
  28. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stewart, D. D., & Stasser, G. (1998). The sampling of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: The role of an informed minority. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 315–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vinokur, A., & Burnstein, E. (1976). Novel argumentation and attitude change: The case of polarization following group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wickens, C. D., & Baker, P. (1995). Cognitive issues in virtual reality. In W. Barfield, & F. Furness (Eds.) Virtual reality and advanced interface design. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Wood, W., Lundgren, Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.; Springer Science+ Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychologisches Institut, Abt. Angewandte Kognitions-und MedienpsychologieUniversität TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations