Investigating patterns of interaction in networked learning and computer-supported collaborative learning: A role for Social Network Analysis

  • Maarten de Laat
  • Vic Lally
  • Lasse Lipponen
  • Robert-Jan Simons
Article

Abstract

The focus of this study is to explore the advances that Social Network Analysis (SNA) can bring, in combination with other methods, when studying Networked Learning/Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (NL/CSCL). We present a general overview of how SNA is applied in NL/CSCL research; we then go on to illustrate how this research method can be integrated with existing studies on NL/CSCL, using an example from our own data, as a way to synthesize and extend our understanding of teaching and learning processes in NLCs. The example study reports empirical work using content analysis (CA), critical event recall (CER) and social network analysis (SNA). The aim is to use these methods to study the nature of the interaction patterns within a networked learning community (NLC), and the way its members share and construct knowledge. The paper also examines some of the current findings of SNA analysis work elsewhere in the literature, and discusses future prospects for SNA. This paper is part of a continuing international study that is investigating NL/CSCL among a community of learners engaged in a master’s program in e-learning.

Keywords

Social Network Analysis Multi-method analysis Learning Teaching Learning communities 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conference context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17.Google Scholar
  2. Banks, S., Goodyear, P., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (2003). Introduction to the special issue on advances in research on networked learning. Instructional Science, 31(1–2), 1–6.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, R. J., Fitzgerald, W. J., & Pauksztat, B. (2003). Individual behaviours and social structure in the development of communication networks of self-organizing online discussion groups. In B. Wason, S. Ludvigson, & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning. Proceedings of the international conference on computer support for collaborative learning 2003 (pp. 313–322). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  4. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2000). Ucinet 5.0 (Version 5.4) [windows]. Natrick: Analytic technologies.Google Scholar
  5. Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho, H., Stefanone, M., & Gay, G. (2002). Social information sharing in a CSCL community. Paper presented at the CSCL 2002, Boulder CO.Google Scholar
  8. Crook, C. (1994). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Daradoumis, T., Martinez-Mones, A., & Xhafa, F. (2004). An integrated approach for analysing and assessing the performance of virtual learning groups. In G. de Vreede, L. A. Guerrero, & G. M. Raventós (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science (lncs 3198) (pp. 289–304). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. de Laat, M. (2006). Networked learning. Apeldoorn: Politie Academy.Google Scholar
  11. de Laat, M. F., & Lally, V. (2003). Complexity, theory and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community. Instructional Science, 31(1–2), 7–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Laat, M. F., & Lally, V. (2004). It’s not so easy: Researching the complexity of emergent participant roles and awareness in asynchronous networked learning discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3), 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Denzin, K., & Lincoln, S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd edn.).Google Scholar
  14. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognition and computational approaches (pp. 1–16). Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  15. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hakkinen, P., Jarvela, S., & Makitalo, K. (2003). Sharing perspectives in virtual interaction: Review of methods of analysis. In B. Wason, S. Ludvigson & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning. Proceedings of the international conference on computer support for collaborative learning 2003 (pp. 395–404). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  17. Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analyses of on-line discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28(2), 115–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haythornthwaite, C. (2001). Exploring multiplexity: Social network structures in a computer-supported distance learning class. The Information Society, 17, 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). Building social networks via computer networks: Creating and sustaining distributed learning communities. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 159–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Howell-Richardson, C., & Mellar, H. (1996). A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer mediated communication courses. Instructional Science, 28, 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Light, P., & Light, V. (1999). Analysing asynchronous learning interactions: Computer-mediated communication in a conventional undergraduate setting. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers: Analysing productive interaction (pp. 162–172). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Martinez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia, B., Gomez, E., & de la Fuente, P. (2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers & Education, 41(4), 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McConnell, D. (1999). Examining a collaborative assessment process in networked lifelong learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15(3), 232–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1999). Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported co-operative learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(6), 484–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nurmela, K., Lehtinen, E., & Palonen, T. (1999). Evaluating CSCL log files by social network analysis. Proceedings of CSCL 1999 (December 1999), Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  27. Pilkington, R. M., & Walker, S. A. (2003). Facilitating debate in networked learning: Reflecting on online synchronous discussion in higher education. Instructional Science, 31(1–2), 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reffay, C., & Chanier, T. (2003). Social Network Analysis Used for Modelling Collaboration in Distance Learning Groups. Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 6th International Conference, ITS 2002, Biarritz, France and San Sebastian, Spain, June 2–7, 2002. Proceedings Retrieved 1 September, 2006, from http://www.springerlink.com/content/Ogfrmknm1tyh2p6k.
  29. Reuven, A., Zippy, E., Gilad, R., & Aviva, G. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 1–23.Google Scholar
  30. Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Strijbos, J. (2004). The effect of roles on computer-supported collaborative learning. PhD dissertation, Open Universiteit Nederland, Heerlen.Google Scholar
  32. Veldhuis-Diermanse, A. E. (2002). Csclearning? Participation, learning activities and knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education. Wageningen: Grafisch Service Centrum Van Gils.Google Scholar
  33. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1997). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: An empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development. Learning and instruction, 9, 493–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wellman, B. (2001). Computer networks as social networks. Science, 293, 2031–2034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.; Springer Science+ Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maarten de Laat
    • 1
    • 2
  • Vic Lally
    • 3
  • Lasse Lipponen
    • 4
  • Robert-Jan Simons
    • 2
  1. 1.e-Learning Research CentreUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  2. 2.Centre for ICT in Education, IVLOSUniversity of UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Centre for Science EducationUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  4. 4.Department of Applied Educational ScienceUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations