The design of collaborative representations faces a challenge in integrating theoretical communication models with the context-sensitive and creative practices of human interaction. This paper presents results from a study that identified multiple, invariant communicative practices in how dyads appropriated flexible, paper-based media in discussions of wicked problems. These invariants, identified across media, participants and topics are a promising first step towards creating an abstract model for design that connects representational affordances and communicative functions. The authors identify areas where this model may challenge conventional design wisdom and discuss directions for further research.
Bronckart, J. P. (1995). Theories of action, speech, natural language, and discourse. In J. V. Wertsch, P. D. Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 75–91). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Conklin, J. (2003). Dialog mapping: Reflections on an industrial strength case study. In P. A. Kirschner, S. J. B. Shum, & C. S. Carr (Eds.), Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making (pp. 117–136). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Dillenbourg, P. (2005). Designing biases that augment socio-cognitive interactions. In R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication-and how they may be overcome (pp. 243–264). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Dillenbourg, P., & Traum, D. (1999). The long road from a shared screen to a shared understanding. In C. Hoadly & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd conference on computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 12–15). Stanford.
Dourish, P. (2006). Implications for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems (pp. 541–550). Montréal, Québec, Canada: ACM.
Finn, K. E., Sellen, A. J., & Wilbur, S. B. (Eds.) (1997). Video-mediated communication. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Galantucci, B. (2005). An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cognitive Science, 29, 737–767.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiruakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 338–366). New York: Appleton, Educational Division.
Gerbner, G. (1956). Toward a general model of communication. Audio Visual Communication Review, IV(3), 171–199.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (1999). The role of gesture in communication and thinking. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(11), 419–429.
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Feldman, H. (1977). The development of language-like communication without a language model. Science, 197(4301), 401–403.
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Mylander, C. (1998). Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures. Nature, 391(15), 279–281.
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.
Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283–307.
Healey, P. G. T., Swoboda, N., Umata, I., & Katagiri, Y. (2002). Graphic representation in graphcal dialogue. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 375–395.
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1991). Disembodied conduct: Communication through video in a multi-media office environment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology (pp. 99–103). New York: ACM.
Herring, S. C. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Paper presented at the International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI.
Hollan, J., & Stornetta, S. (1992). Beyond being there. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Monterey, CA.
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (Ed.), Style and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Kaput, J., & Hegedus, S. (2002). Exploring classroom connectivity by aggregating student constructions to create new learning opportunities. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, UK.
Kato, H., Yamazaki, K., Suzuki, H., Kuzuoka, H., Miki, H., & Yamazaki, A. (2001). Designing a video-mediated collaboration system based on a body metaphor. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 409–423). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Krauss, R. M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 54–59.
Lingnau, A., Hoppe, H. U., & Mannhaupt, G. (2003). Computer supported collaborative writing in an early learning classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(2), 186–194.
Mark, G., & Abrams, S. (2005). Differential interaction and attribution in collocated and distributed large-scale collaboration. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences. Hawai’i: IEEE.
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-computer Interaction, 15(2/3), 139–178.
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2002). Groupware and computer-supported cooperative work. In J. A. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications (pp. 583–595). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
O’Neill, J., & Martin, D. (2003). Text chat in action. In Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work (pp. 40–49). Sanibel Island, FL, USA: ACM.
Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.
Sacks, H. (1984a). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 21–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H. (1984b). On doing “being ordinary”. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 413–429). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Selvin, A. M. (2003). Fostering collective intelligence: Helping groups use visualized argumentation. In P. A. Kirschner, S. J. B. Shum, & C. S. Carr (Eds.), Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making (pp. 137–163). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423.
Shipman, F. M., III, & McCall, R. (1994). Supporting knowledge-base evolution with incremental formalization. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence (pp. 285–291). Boston, MA: ACM.
Sugimoto, M. (2003). How sensing and mobile technologies can enhance collaborative learning in classrooms and museums. Paper presented at CSCL 2003: Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments, Bergen, Norway.
Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning-making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computers Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315–337.
van Bruggen, J. M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2003). Designing external representations to support solving wicked problems. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Whitworth, B., Gallupe, B., & McQueen, R. (2000). A cognitive three-process model of computer-mediated group interaction. Group Decision and Negotiation, 9, 431–456.
About this article
Cite this article
Dwyer, N., Suthers, D.D. Consistent practices in artifact-mediated collaboration. Computer Supported Learning 1, 481–511 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9001-1
- Descriptive studies
- Interactional practices
- Representational affordances
- Shared workspaces
- Video analysis