A dialogic understanding of the relationship between CSCL and teaching thinking skills

  • Rupert WegerifEmail author


How to teach flexible thinking and learning skills, particularly creativity and the skill of “learning to learn,” is a key concern for CSCL in the context of the emerging Networked Society. The currently dominant paradigms for supporting pedagogical design within CSCL, including socio-cultural theory, are limited in the support that they can offer to the project of teaching general thinking skills. This paper uses critical literature review, conceptual analysis, and evidence from case studies to argue for the value of a dialogic interpretative framework that links the goal of teaching thinking with the method of CSCL. The evidence reviewed suggests that dialogue is itself the primary thinking skill from which all others are derived. It is argued from this that dialogic theory offers a possible solution to the problem of how to conceptualize general thinking skills for CSCL: this is that teaching dialogue as an end in itself promotes the learning of general thinking skills. Implications of the proposed framework for pedagogical design are brought out through case studies illustrating the use of CSCL to broaden and deepen dialogic spaces of reflection.


Creativity Dialogic Learning to learn Theory Thinking skills 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (2003). Argumentation, computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognitions. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 1–25). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. (1981) The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York; Toronto: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
  6. Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Carter, R. (2002). Language and creativity. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Castells, M. (2001). The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Derrida, J. (1968). La différance. In Théorie d'ensemble (pp. 43–69). Paris: Éditions de Seuil.Google Scholar
  11. Derrida, J. (1972). La dissémination. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  12. Edwards, D. (1996). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger, M. (1969). Identity and difference (Bilingual edition; J. Stambaugh, Trans.). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  14. Holquist, M. (1981). Glossary for Bakhtin, M. The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  15. Koschmann T. (Ed.). (1996). CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Koschmann, T. D. (1999). Toward a dialogic theory of learning: Bakhtin's contribution to understanding learning in settings of collaboration. In C. M. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 Conference (pp. 308–313). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Koschmann, T. (2001). Revisiting the paradigms of instructional technology. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught, & T. Petrovic (Eds.), Meeting at the crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 15–22). Melbourne: Biomedical Multimedia Unit, The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  18. Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd Edition). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. McMahon, H., & O'Neill, W. (1993). Computer-mediated zones of engagement in learning. In T. Duffy, J. Lowyk, & D. Jonassen (Eds.), Designing environments for constructive learning. Berlin: Springer–Verlag.Google Scholar
  20. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Le visible et l'invisible. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  21. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). In C. Lefort (Ed.), The visible and the invisible (A. Lingis, Trans.). Evanston, Il: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  23. Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. (1995). Manual for raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Section 1: General Overview. (1995 edition). Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ravenscroft, A., & McAlister, S. (in press). Designing interaction as a dialogue game. In C. Juwah (Ed.), Interactions in online education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Ravenscroft, A., & Pilkington, R. M. (2000). Investigation by design: Developing dialogue models to support reasoning and conceptual change. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Special Issue on Analyzing Learning, 11(1), 273–298.Google Scholar
  26. Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  27. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Wegerif, R. (2004). The role of educational software as a support for teaching and learning conversations. Computers and Education, 43(2), 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (2004). Thinking and learning with ICT: Raising achievement in primary classrooms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Wegerif, R., Perez Linares, J., Rojas Drummond, S., Mercer, N., & Velez, M. (2005a). Thinking together in the UK and Mexico: Transfer of an educational innovation. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 40(1), 40–48.Google Scholar
  32. Wegerif, R., Ravenscroft, A., & McAlister, S. (2005b, August). Investigating the social dimension of induction into argumentation. EARLI Conference, Nicosia, Cyprus.Google Scholar
  33. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. New York: Harvester.Google Scholar
  34. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc., Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of Southampton HighfieldSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations