Advertisement

Metacognition and Learning

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 57–90 | Cite as

Regulation and socio-emotional interactions in a positive and a negative group climate

  • Aishah Bakhtiar
  • Elizabeth A. Webster
  • Allyson F. Hadwin
Article

Abstract

Collaboration in an online environment can be a socially and emotionally demanding task. It requires group members to engage in a great deal of regulation, where favourable emotions need to be sustained for the group’s productive functioning. The purpose of this cross-case analysis was to examine the interplay of two groups’ regulatory processes, regulatory modes, and socio-emotional interactions that contribute to or are influenced by emotions and socio-emotional climate perceived in the group. Specifically, this study compared a group of 4 students unanimously reporting a positive climate to a group of 4 students unanimously reporting a negative climate after completing a 90-min online text-based collaborative assignment. By drawing on two data channels (i.e., observed regulatory actions and socio-emotional interactions during collaboration and self-reported data about emotional beliefs and perceptions), four contrasting group features emerged: (a) incoming conditions served as a foundation for creating a positive collaborative experience, (b) regulation of emotions during initial planning, (c) negative emotions served as a constraint for shared adaptation in the face of a challenge, and (d) encouragement and motivational statements served as effective strategies for creating a positive climate. Implications for researching and supporting emotion regulation in collaborative learning are discussed.

Keywords

Cross-case analysis Computer-supported collaborative learning Regulation Socio-emotional interactions Emotions 

Notes

Funding information

This study was funded by Social Science and Humanities Research Council Canada (Standard Research Grant 435–2012-0529 awarded to A. F. Hadwin; and Doctoral Fellowship awarded to E. A. Webster).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

A. F. Hadwin and E. A. Webster have received research grants from Social Science and Humanities Research Council Canada. A. F. Hadwin is a current member of Metacognition and Learning Journal Editorial Board.

References

  1. Ayoko, O. B., Konrad, A. M., & Boyle, M. V. (2012). Online work: Managing conflict and emotions for performance in virtual teams. European Management Journal, 30(2), 156–174. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2011.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, 322(7294), 1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. doi: 10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boekaerts, M. (2011). Emotions, emotion regulation, and self-regulation of learning. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 408–425). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiu, M. M., & Khoo, L. (2003). Rudeness and status effects during group problem solving: Do they bias evaluations and reduce the likelihood of correct solutions? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Derks, D., Fischer, A. H., & Bos, A. E. R. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 766–785. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dillenbourg, P., & Tchounikine, P. (2007). Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). Technology-enhanced learning. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning: Principles and products (pp. 3–19). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duffy, M. C., & Shaw, J. D. (2000). The Salieri syndrome: Consequences of envy in groups. Small Group Research, 31(1), 3–23. doi: 10.1177/104649640003100101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fransen, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2011). Mediating team effectiveness in the context of collaborative learning: The importance of team and task awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1103–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially-shared regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–84). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2017). Self-regulation, co-regulation and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In D. Schunk & J. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2010). Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Veermans, M. (2008). Understanding dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(1), 122–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). Exploring socially shared regulation in the context of collaboration. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(3), 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., et al. (2015). Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: Designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(1), 125–142. doi: 10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Hadwin, A., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Miller, M., & Laru, J. (2016). Socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Understanding and prompting individual-and group-level shared regulatory activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(3), 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2005). How students describe the sources of their emotional and motivational experiences during the learning process: A qualitative approach. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 465–480. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2009). Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: Do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges? The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 463–481. doi: 10.1348/000709909X402811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2013). Regulating emotions together for motivated collaboration. In M. Baker, J. Andriessen, & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Affective learning together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning. Routledge. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4842-6.
  24. Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 530–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  26. Kempler, T. M., & Linnenbrink, E. A. (2006). Helping behaviors in collaborative groups in math: A descriptive analysis. In S. A. Karabenick & R. S. Newman (Eds.), Help seeking in academic settings: Goals, groups, and contexts (pp. 89–116). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  27. Kleinginna Jr., P. R., & Kleinginna, A. M. (1981). A categorized list of emotion definitions, with suggestions for a consensual definition. Motivation and Emotion, 5(4), 345–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., et al. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2–3), 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koole, S. L. (2009). The psychology of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Cognition & Emotion, 23(1), 4–41. doi: 10.1080/02699930802619031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Vermeulen, M. (2013). Social aspects of CSCL environments: A research framework. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kwon, K., Liu, Y.-H., & Johnson, L. P. (2014). Group regulation and social-emotional interactions observed in computer supported collaborative learning: Comparison between good vs. poor collaborators. Computers & Education, 78, 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lajoie, S. P., Lee, L., Poitras, E., Bassiri, M., Kazemitabar, M., Cruz-Panesso, I., et al. (2015). The role of regulation in medical student learning in small groups: Regulating oneself and others’ learning and emotions. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 601–616. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Rogat, T. K., & Koskey, K. L. K. (2011). Affect and engagement during small group instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Panadero, E. (2015). Promoting socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Progress of socially shared regulation among high-and low-performing groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 562–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marks, M., Mathieu, J., & Zaccaro, S. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. The Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2001.4845785.Google Scholar
  37. Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 805–835. doi: 10.1016/j.jm.2004.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCaslin, M., & Good, T. L. (1996). The informal curriculum. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 622–670). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  40. Miller, M., & Hadwin, A. F. (2015). Scripting and awareness tools for regulating collaborative learning: Changing the landscape of support in CSCL. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 573–588. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Näykki, P., Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., & Järvenoja, H. (2014). Socio-emotional conflict in collaborative learning—A process-oriented case study in a higher education context. International Journal of Educational Research, 68, 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2014.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Orvis, K. L., Wisher, R. A., Bonk, C. J., & Olson, T. M. (2002). Communication patterns during synchronous web-based military training in problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(6), 783–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Panadero, E., Kirschner, P. A., Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., & Järvenoja, H. (2015). How individual self-regulation affects group regulation and performance: A shared regulation intervention. Small Group Research, 46(4), 431–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Partnership for 21st Century Learning (2007). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework.
  45. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452–502). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Pitman, M. A., & Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Qualitative approaches to evaluation: Models and methods. The handbook of qualitative research in education, 729, 770.Google Scholar
  48. Rogat, T. K., & Adams-Wiggins, K. R. (2015). Interrelation between regulatory and socioemotional processes within collaborative groups characterized by facilitative and directive other-regulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 589–600. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction, 29(4), 375–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rosenberg, E. L. (1998). Levels of analysis and the organization of affect. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 14(2), 50–71.Google Scholar
  52. Scherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44(4), 695–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schutz, P. A., Distefano, C., Benson, J., & Davis, H. A. (2004). The emotional regulation during test-taking scale. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 17(3), 253–269. doi: 10.1080/10615800410001710861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Solomon, R. C. (2008). The philosophy of emotions. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. Feldman Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 3–16). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  55. Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, H. W., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37(5), 490–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Volet, S. (2001). Significance of cultural and motivation variables on students’ attitudes towards group work. Student Motivation (pp. 309–333). US: Springer.Google Scholar
  57. Volet, S., & Mansfield, C. (2006). Group work at university: Significance of personal goals in the regulation strategies of students with positive and negative appraisals. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(4), 341–356. doi: 10.1080/07294360600947301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128–143. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Webster, E. A., & Hadwin, A. F. (2014). Emotions and emotion regulation in undergraduate studying: Examining students’ reports from a self-regulated learning perspective. Educational Psychology, 1–25. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2014.895292.
  62. Williams, M. (2007). Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: A threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 595–621. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.24351867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated engagement in learning. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  64. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research and applications (pp. 298–314). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  65. Winne, P. H., Hadwin, A. F., & Perry, N. E. (2013). Metacognition and computer-supported collaborative learning. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 462–479). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  66. Wosnitza, M., & Volet, S. (2005). Origin, direction and impact of emotions in social online learning. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 449–464. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Psychology and Leadership StudiesUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations