Metacognition and Learning

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 339–368 | Cite as

Assessing metacognitive knowledge in 3–5 year olds: the development of a metacognitive knowledge interview (McKI)

  • Loren M. Marulis
  • Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar
  • Amanda L. Berhenke
  • David Whitebread
Article

Abstract

Historically, early cognitive skills have been underestimated, largely as a result of the ways these competencies have been measured, which is particularly pervasive in the area of metacognition. Only recently have researchers begun to detect evidence of contextualized metacognition in 3–5 year old preschool children through the use of observational assessment tools (e.g., Whitebread et al. J Cogn Educ Psychol 3:433-455, 2007, Metacognition Learn 4:63-85, 2009). While these observational methods are a more sensitive way to capture metacognition in young children, their exclusive use may not result in a comprehensive depiction of early metacognitive competency. In the current study, we describe the development of a metacognitive knowledge interview (McKI) and what it reveals about metacognitive processes in 43 3–5 year olds (including investigating face validity). Findings indicate that the McKI (a) is a developmentally appropriate measure for 3–5 year olds, (b) is capable of eliciting articulated metacognitive knowledge when engaging in a contextualized problem-solving task, (c) shows the expected developmental trend (i.e., older children perform at a higher level and scores increased over the course of a school year), and (d) provides sufficient variation across children. Implications for future research are discussed, including the importance of using multiple measurement tools when studying early metacognitive development.

Keywords

Metacognition Metacognitive Knowledge Early childhood Interview Assessment 

References

  1. Alexander, J. M., Carr, M., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1995). Development of metacognition in gifted children: directions for future research. Developmental Review, 15, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Annevirta, T., & Vauras, M. (2001). Metacognitive knowledge in primary grades: a longitudinal study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 257–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Annevirta, T., Laakkonen, E., Kinnunen, R., & Vauras, M. (2007). Developmental dynamics of metacognitive knowledge and text comprehension skill in the first primary school years. Metacognition & Learning, 2, 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Astington, J. W., Harris, P. L., & Olson, D. (Eds.). (1988). Developing theories of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bartsch, K., & Estes, D. (1996). Individual differences in children’s developing theory of mind and implications for metacognition. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bemis, R. H., Leichtman, M. D., & Pillemer, D. B. (2013). I remember when you taught me that! Preschool children’s memories of realistic learning episodes. Infant and Child Development, 22, 603–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berhenke, A. L., Marulis, L. M., & Neidlinger, N. (2012). Hot and cold executive functioning, motivation, and metacognition: Disentangling young children’s approaches to learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  8. Borkowski, J. (1996). Metacognition: theory or chapter heading? Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borkowski, J., Carr, M., & Pressley, M. (1987). Spontaneous strategy use: perspectives from metacognitive theory. Intelligence, 11, 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brinck, I., & Liljenfors, R. (2013). The developmental origins of metacognition. Infant and Child Development, 22, 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  13. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: a practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dermitzaki, I., Leondari, A., & Goudas, M. (2009). Relations between young children's strategic behaviours, domain-specific self-concept, and performance in a problem-solving situation. Learning and Instruction, 9, 144–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & Huylebroeck, A. (2006). Metacognitive skills in Belgian third grade children (age 8 to 9) with and without mathematical learning disabilities. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self–regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta–analysis on self–regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3, 101–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test, third, edition. MN: American Guidance Service, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition. Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Efklides, A., & Misailidi, P. (2010). Introduction: The present and the future in metacognition. In A. Efklides & P. Misailidi (Eds.), Trends and prospects in metacognition research (pp. 1–18). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fink, A. (1995). How to measure survey reliability and validity. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flavell, J. H. (1992). Cognitive development: past, present, and future. Developmental Psychology, 28, 998–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flavell, J. H. (2000). Development of children’s knowledge about the mental world. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flavell, J. H. (2004). Theory-of-mind development: retrospect and prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50, 274–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gelman, R., & Baillargeon, R. (1983). A review of some Piagetian concepts. In J. H. Flavell and E. M. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive Development, Vol. 3. In P. H. Mussen (General Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 167–230). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Karabenick, J. A. D. (1981). The Development of comprehension monitoring in young children Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  28. Karabenick, S. A., Woolley, M. E., Friedel, J. M., Ammon, B. V., Blazevski, J., Bonney, C. R., & Kelly, K. L. (2007). Cognitive processing of self-report items in educational research: Do they think what we mean? Educational Psychologist, 42, 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kline, P. (1999). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Kreutzer, M. A., Leonard, S. C., & Flavell, J. H. (1975). An interview study of children’s knowledge about memory. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40(1 Serial No. 159).Google Scholar
  31. Kuhn, D. (2000). Theory of mind, metacognition, and reasoning: A life-span perspective. In P. Mitchell & K. J. Riggs (Eds.), Children’s reasoning and the mind (pp. 301–326). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2004). Metacognition: a bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory Into Practice, 43, 268–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Larkin, S. (2015). Metacognitive experiences: Taking account of feelings in early years education. In S. Robson & S. Quinn (Eds.), The routledge international handbook of young Children's thinking and understanding (pp. 189–198). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Lillard, A. S., & Kavanaugh, R. D. (2014). The contribution of symbolic skills to the development of an explicit theory of mind. Child Development, 85, 1535–1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2006). Precursors of metamemory in in young children: the role of theory of mind and metacognitive vocabulary. Metacognitive and Learning, 1, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lyons, K. E., & Ghetti, S. (2010). Metacognitive development in early childhood: New questions about old assumptions. In A. Efklides & P. Misailidi (Eds.), Trends and prospects in metacognition research (pp. 259–278). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marazita, J. M., & Merriman, W. E. (2004). Young children's judgment of whether they know names for objects: the metalinguistic ability it reflects and the processes it involves. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 458–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marulis, L. M., Kim, M. H., Grammer, J. K., Carrasco, M., Morrison, F. J., & Gehring, W. J. (2013). How does young children’s metacognitive knowledge relate to their error-related brain activity and academic achievement? Paper presented at the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction Biennial Conference, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
  39. Marulis, L. M., Kim, M. H., Grammer, J. K., Carrasco, M., Morrison, F. J., & Gehring, W. J. (2015). The association between young children’s metacognitive knowledge, error-related brain activity, and reading and math skills. Poster to be presented at the Biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  40. Moore, C., Furrow, D., Chiasson, L., & Patriquin, M. (1994). Developmental relationships between production and comprehension of mental terms. First Language, 14, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morgan, G. A., Busch-Rossnagel, N. A., Maslin-Cole, C.A., & Harmon, R.J. (1992). Individualized assessment of mastery motivation: Manual for 15 to 36 month old children. Retrieved from http://mycahs.colostate.edu/George.Morgan/docs/IndividualAssessmentOfMasteryMotivation.pdf.
  42. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: knowing about knowing. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Overbeek, T. J. M., Nieuwenhuis, S., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2005). Dissociable components of error processing. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19, 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Prins, F. J., Veenman, M. V. J., & Elshout, J. J. (2006). The impact of intellectual ability and metacognition on learning: New support for the threshold of problematicity theory. Learning & Instruction, 16, 374–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2003). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. San Antonio: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
  46. Rhodes, M., & Wellman, H. (2013). Constructing a new theory from old ideas and new evidence. Cognitive Science, 37, 592–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2000). An ecological perspective on the transition to kindergarten: a theoretical framework to guide empirical research. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21, 491–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rueda, M. R., Pozuelos, J. P., Paz-Alonso, P. M., Combita-Merchan, L., & Abundis, A. (2011). Metacognitive and attention training and error monitoring in early childhood. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society.Google Scholar
  49. Sektnan, M., McClelland, M. M., Acock, A. C., & Morrison, F. J. (2010). Relations between early family risk, children’s self-regulation, and academic achievement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 464–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shamir, A., Mevarech, Z. R., & Gida, C. (2009). The assessment of meta-cognition in different contexts: individualized vs. peer-assisted learning. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shatz, M., Wellman, H. M., & Silber, S. (1983). The acquisition of mental verbs: a systematic investigation of the first reference to mental state. Cognition, 14, 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smiley, P. A., & Dweck, C. S. (1994). Individual differences in achievement goals among young children. Child Development, 65, 1723–1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tunmer, W. E., & Herriman, M. L. (1984). The development of metalinguistic awareness: A conceptual overview. In W. E. Tunmer, C. Pratt, & M. L. Herriman (Eds.), Metalinguistic awareness in children: theory, research and implications (pp. 12–35). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: the development of higher mental processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1990). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wellman, H. M. (1985). The child’s theory of mind: The development of conceptions of cognition. In S. R. Yussen (Ed.), The growth of reflection in children (pp. 169–206). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  58. Wellman, H. M. (2014). Making minds: how theory of mind develops. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wellman, H., & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks. Child Development, 75, 523–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Whitebread, D., & Pino-Pasternak, D. (2010). Metacognition, self-regulation, and meta-knowing. In K. Littleton, C. Wood, & J. K. Staarman (Eds.), International handbook of psychology in education (pp. 673–711). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  62. Whitebread, D., Bingham, S., Grau, V., Pasternak, D., & Sangster, C. (2007). Development of metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children: role of collaborative and peer-assisted learning. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3, 433–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Pino-Pasternak, D., Sangster, C., Grau, V., Bingham, S., Almeqdad, Q., & Demetriou, D. (2009). The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Whitebread, D., Almeqdad, Q., Bryce, D., Demetriou, D., Grau, V., & Sangster, C. (2010). Metacognition in young children: Current methodological and theoretical developments. In A. Efklides & P. Misailidi (Eds.), Trends and prospects in metacognition research (pp. 233–258). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
  66. Young, A., & Fry, J. D. (2008). Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8, 1–10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Loren M. Marulis
    • 1
  • Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar
    • 2
  • Amanda L. Berhenke
    • 3
  • David Whitebread
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Human DevelopmentConnecticut CollegeNew LondonUSA
  2. 2.School of EducationUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychology & EducationAlbertus Magnus CollegeNew HavenUSA
  4. 4.Faculty of EducationUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations