Advertisement

Metacognition and Learning

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 151–173 | Cite as

Executive functioning, metacognition, and self-perceived competence in elementary school children: an explorative study on their interrelations and their role for school achievement

  • Claudia M. RoebersEmail author
  • Patrizia Cimeli
  • Marianne Röthlisberger
  • Regula Neuenschwander
Article

Abstract

In the present study, associations between executive functioning, metacognition, and self-perceived competence in the context of early academic outcomes were examined. A total of 209 children attending first grade were initially assessed in terms of their executive functioning and academic self-concept. One year later, children’s executive functioning, academic self-concept, metacognitive monitoring and control, as well as their achievement in mathematics and literacy were evaluated. Structural equation modeling revealed that executive functioning was significantly related to metacognitive control, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally, and that self-concept was substantially associated with metacognitive monitoring, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Individual differences in executive functioning and metacognitive control were significantly related to academic outcomes, with metacognitive control appearing to yield a more circumscribed influence on academic outcomes (only literacy) compared to executive functioning (literacy and mathematics).

Keywords

Metacognition Monitoring Control Executive functions Self-concept School achievement Self-regulation 

Notes

Authors’ Note

The present study was partially financed by the Jacobs Foundation Zürich (project “Transition to School”; PI: Claudia M. Roebers). We wish to thank the participating children, and gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of the children’s teachers and principals. We also wish to thank the student research assistants who helped with data collection and Uli Orth for teaching us structural equation modeling techniques.

References

  1. Arbuckle, J. (2009). AMOS 18.0 user’s guide. Crawfordville: Amos Development Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. Archibald, S. J., & Kerns, K. A. (1999). Identification and description of new tests of executive functioning in children. Child Neuropsychology, 5, 115–129. doi: 10.1076/chin.5.2.115.3167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Onatsu-Arvilommi, T., & Nurmi, J. E. (2002). Three methods for studying developmental change: a case of reading skills and self-concept. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 343–364. doi: 10.1348/000709902320634447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Best, J. R., & Miller, P. H. (2010). A developmental perspective on executive function. Child Development, 81, 1641–1660. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01499.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjorklund, D. F., & Bering, J. M. (2002). The evolved child: applying evolutionary developmental psychology to modern schooling. Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 1–27. doi: 10.1016/S1041-6080(02)00047-X.Google Scholar
  6. Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78, 647–663. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blair, C., & Diamond, A. (2008). Biological processes in prevention and intervention: the promotion of self-regulation as a means of preventing school failure. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 899–911. doi: 10.1017/S0954579408000436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445–457. doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borkowski, J. G., Chan, L. K. S., & Muthukrishna, N. (2000). A process-oriented model of metacognition: Links between motivation and executive functioning. In J. G. Borkowski & J. D. Day (Eds.), Cognition in special children: Comparative approaches to retardation, learning disabilities, and giftedness (pp. 123–152). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  10. Bull, R., Espy, K. A., Wiebe, S. A., Sheffield, T. D., & Nelson, J. M. (2011). Using confirmatory factor analysis to understand executive control in preschool children: sources of variation in emergent mathematic achievement. Developmental Science, 14, 679–692. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01012.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bunge, S. A., & Zelazo, P. D. (2006). A brain-based account of the development of rule use in childhood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 118–121. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00419.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Cornoldi, C. (2010). Metacognition, intelligence, and academic performance. In H. S. Waters & W. Schneider (Eds.), Metacognition, strategy use, and instruction (pp. 257–277). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. de Bruin, A. B. H., Thiede, K. W., Camp, G., & Redford, J. (2011). Generating keywords improves metacomprehension and self-regulation in elementary and middle school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 294–310. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeMarie, D., Miller, P. H., Ferron, J., & Cunningham, W. R. (2004). Path analysis tests of theoretical models of children’s memory performance. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 461–492. doi: 10.1207/s15327647jcd0504_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diamond, A. (2000). Close interrelation of motor development and cognitive development and of the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex. Child Development, 71, 44–56. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., … & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428Google Scholar
  18. Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2004). Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study. Memory & Cognition, 32, 779–788. doi: 10.3758/bf03195868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunlosky, J., & Bjork, R. A. (2008). The integrated nature of metamemory and memory. In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of metamemory and memory (pp. 11–28). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  20. Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: the MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46, 6–25. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.538645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fernandez-Duque, D., Baird, J. A., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Executive attention and metacognitive regulation. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 288–307. doi: 10.1006/ccog.2000.0447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fisk, J. E., & Sharp, C. A. (2004). Age-related impairment in executive functioning: updating, inhibition, shifting, and access. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 874–890. doi: 10.1080/13803390490510680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flavell, J. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1977). Metamemory. In R. V. Kail & J. W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition (pp. 3–33). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Robinson, J. L., & Hewitt, J. K. (2011). Developmental trajectories in toddlers’ self-restraint predict individual differences in executive functions 14 years later: a behavioral genetic analysis. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1410–1430. doi: 10.1037/a0023750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: a review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 31–60. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ghetti, S., Mirandola, C., Angelini, L., Cornoldi, C., & Ciaramelli, E. (2011). Development of subjective recollection: understanding of and introspection on memory states. Child Development, 82, 1954–1969. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01645.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grammer, J. K., Purtell, K. M., Coffman, J. L., & Ornstein, P. A. (2011). Relations between children’s metamemory and strategic performance: time-varying covariates in early elementary school. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 139–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin’s model of self-regulated learning: new perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77, 334–372. doi: 10.3102/003465430303953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grissmer, D., Grimm, K. J., Aiyer, S. M., Murrah, W. M., & Steele, J. S. (2009). Fine motor skills and early comprehension of the world: two new school readiness indicators. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1008–1017. doi: 10.1037/a0020104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2009). A growing sense of “agency”. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 1–4). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Hacker, D. J., Keener, M. C., & Kircher, J. C. (2009). Writing is applied metacognition. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 154–172). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Haffner, J., Baro, K., Parzer, P., & Resch, F. (2005). HRT 1–4 Heidelberger Rechentest. Erfassung mathematischer Basiskompetenzen im Grundschulalter. [HRT 1–4 Test of arithmetic skills. Measuring basic mathematical skills in elementary school age]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  34. Harter, S. (2012). The construction of the self. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  35. Harter, S., & Pike, R. (1984). The Pictorial scale of perceived competence and social acceptance for young-children. Child Development, 55, 1969–1982. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1984.tb03895.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hertzog, C., Dixon, R. A., & Hultsch, D. F. (1990). Relationships between metamemory, memory predictions, and memory task performance in adults. Psychology and Aging, 5, 215–227. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.5.2.215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hongwanishkul, D., Happaney, K. R., Lee, W. S. C., & Zelazo, P. D. (2005). Hot and cool executive functions: age-related changes and individual differences. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 617–644. doi: 10.1207/s15326942dn2802_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modelling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. doi: 10.1037//1082-989X.3.4.424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hughes, C., Ensor, R., Wilson, A., & Graham, A. (2010). Tracking executive function across the transition to school: a latent variable approach. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35, 20–36. doi: 0.1080/87565640903325691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huizinga, M., Dolan, C. V., & van der Molen, M. W. (2006). Age-related change in executive function: developmental trends and a latent variable analysis. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2017–2036. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kao, Y. C., Davis, E. S., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2005). Neural correlates of actual and predicted memory formation. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1776–1783. doi: 10.1038/nn1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kleitman, S., & Stankov, L. (2007). Self-confidence and metacognitive processes. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 161–173. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490–517. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Krebs, S. S., & Roebers, C. M. (2010). Children’s strategic regulation, metacognitive monitoring, and control processes during test taking. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 325–340. doi: 10.1348/000709910X485719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Krebs, S. S., & Roebers C. M. eFirst (2012). The impact of retrieval processes, age, general achievement level, and test scoring scheme for children’s metacognitive monitoring and controlling. Metacognition and Learning. doi:  10.1007/s11409-011-9079-3
  46. Kuhn, D. (1999). Metacognitive development. In L. Balter & C. T. LeMonda (Eds.), Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues (pp. 259–286). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  47. Kuhn, D., & Pease, M. (2010). The dual components of developing strategy use: Production and inhibition. In H. S. Waters & W. Schneider (Eds.), Metacognition, strategy use, and instruction (pp. 135–159). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  48. Küspert, P., & Schneider, W. (1998). Würzburger Leise Leseprobe (WLLP). [Würzburger’s Reading Test]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  49. Lee, K., Ng, E. L., & Ng, S. F. (2009). The contributions of working memory and executive functioning to problem representation and solution generation in algebraic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 373–387. doi: 10.1037/a0013843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2007). Knowledge about the mind: links between theory of mind and later metamemory. Child Development, 78, 148–167. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00990.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Luo, L., Luk, G., & Bialystok, E. (2010). Effect of language proficiency and executive control on verbal fluency performance in bilinguals. Cognition, 114, 29–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lyons, K. E., & Ghetti, S. (2011). The development of uncertainty monitoring in early childhood. Child Development, 82, 1778–1787. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01649.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lyons, K. E., & Zelazo, P. D. (2011). Monitoring, metacognition, and executive function: Elucidating the role of self-reflection in the development of self-regulation. In B. B. Janette (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 40, pp. 379–412). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  55. Mantzicopoulos, P. (2006). Younger children’s changing self-concepts: boys and girls from preschool through second grade. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 167, 289–308. doi: 10.3200/GNTP.167.3.289-308.Google Scholar
  56. Marsh, H. W., & Ayotte, V. (2003). Do multiple dimensions of self-concept become more differentiated with age? The differential distinctiveness hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 687–706. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Marsh, H. W., Ellis, L. A., & Craven, R. G. (2002). How do preschool children feel about themselves? Unraveling measurement and multidimensional self-concept structure. Developmental Psychology, 38, 376–393. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.38.3.376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. May, P. (2002). HSP 1–9. Diagnose orthographischer Kompetenz zur Erfassung der grundlegenden Rechtschreibstrategien (6. Auflage). [Diagnosis of orthographic skills for quantifying basic spelling strategies]. Hamburg, Germany: Verlag für pädagogische Medien.Google Scholar
  59. Mayringer, H., & Wimmer, H. (2003). SLS 1–4. Salzburger Lese-Screening für die Klassenstufen 1–4. [Salzburger’s Reading-Screening for 1st to 4th graders]. Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  60. Milner, B. (1964). Some effects of frontal-lobe lobectomy in man. In J. Warren & K. Akert (Eds.), The frontal granular cortex and behavior (pp. 313–331). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  61. Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8–14. doi: 10.1177/0963721411429458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 2693–2698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010076108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Monette, S., Bigras, M., & Guay, M.-C. (2011). The role of the executive functions in school achievement at the end of Grade 1. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 158–173. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.01.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Moore, C. (2010). The development of future-oriented decision-making. In B. W. Sokol, U. Müller, J. I. M. Carpendale, A. R. Young, & G. Iarocci (Eds.), Self and self-regulation (pp. 270–286). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Moore, C., Bryant, D., & Furrow, D. (1989). Mental terms and the development of certainty. Child Development, 60, 167–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Munakata, Y., Snyder, H. R., & Chatham, C. H. (2012). Developing cognitive control: three key transitions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 71–77. doi: 10.1177/0963721412436807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 26, pp. 125–141). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  69. Nicholls, J. G. (1978). The development of the concepts of effort and ability, perception of academic attainment, and the understanding that difficult tasks require more ability. Child Development, 49, 800–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. OECD. (2005). Pisa 2003: Technical report. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pannu, J. K., & Kaszniak, A. W. (2005). Metamemory experiments in neurological populations: a review. Neuropsychology Review, 15, 105–130. doi: 10.1007/s11065-005-7091-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Peugh, J. L., & Enders, C. K. (2004). Missing data in educational research: a review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. Review of Educational Research, 74, 525–556. doi: 10.3102/00346543074004525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pressley, M., Borkwski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing: what it is and how education can promote it. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 857–867. doi: 10.1016/0883-0355(89)90069-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Roebers, C. M., & Fernandez, O. (2002). The effects of accuracy motivation on children’s and adults’ event recall, suggestibility, and their answers to unanswerable questions. Journal of Cognition and Development, 3, 415–443. doi: 10.1207/S15327647jcd3,4-03.Google Scholar
  75. Roebers, C. M., & Kauer, M. (2009). Motor and cognitive control in a normative sample of 7-year-olds. Developmental Science, 12, 175–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00755.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Roebers, C. M., von der Linden, N., Schneider, W., & Howie, P. (2007). Children’s metamemorial judgments in an event recall task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 117–137. doi: 10.1348/026151006x104392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Roebers, C. M., Schmid, C., & Roderer, T. (2009). Metacognitive monitoring and control processes involved in primary school children’s test performance. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 749–767. doi: 10.1348/978185409x429842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schneider, W. (2010). Metacognition and memory development in childhood and adolescence. In H. S. Waters & W. Schneider (Eds.), Metacognition, strategy use and instruction (pp. 54–81). New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  79. Schneider, W. (2011). Memory development in childhood. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (2nd ed., pp. 357–367). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  80. Schneider, W., & Lockl, K. (2008). Procedural metacognition in children: Evidence for developmental trends. In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of metamemory and memory (pp. 391–409). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  81. Schneider, W., & Artelt, C. (2010). Metacognition and mathematics education. ZDM:The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42, 149–161. doi: 10.1007/s11858-010-0240-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schneider, W., Schlagmüller, M., & Visé, M. (1998). The impact of metamemory and domain-specific knowledge on memory performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13, 91–103. doi: 10.1007/BF03172815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schwartz, B. L., & Bacon, E. (2008). Metacognitive neuroscience. In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of metamemory and memory (pp. 355–371). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  84. Serra, M. J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Effective implementation of metacognition. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 278–298). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. Shin, H., Bjorklund, D. F., & Beck, E. F. (2007). The adaptive nature of children’s overestimation in a strategic memory task. Cognitive Development, 22, 197–212. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  87. Spinath, B., & Spinath, F. M. (2005). Development of self-perceived ability in elementary school: the role of parents’ perceptions, teacher evaluations, and intelligence. Cognitive Development, 20, 190–204. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. St. Clair-Thompson, H. L., & Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Executive functions and achievements in school: shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 745–759. doi: 10.1080/17470210500162854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Stipek, D. J., & Daniels, D. H. (1988). Declining perceptions of competence—a consequence of changes in the child or in the educational environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 352–356. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Stoettinger, E., Kaiser, W., & Perner, J. (2009). Remember judgments and the constraint of direct experience. Psychological Research, 73, 623–632. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0178-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Unsworth, N., Spillers, G. J., & Brewer, G. A. (2011). Variation in verbal fluency: a latent variable analysis of clustering, switching, and overall performance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 447–466. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.505292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. van der Stel, M., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2008). Relation between intellectual ability and metacognitive skillfulness as predictors of learning performance of young students performing tasks in different domains. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 128–134. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. van der Ven, S. H. G., Kroesbergen, E. H., Boom, J., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2012). The development of executive functions and early mathematics: a dynamic relationship. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 100–119. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02035.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. von der Linden, N., & Roebers, C. M. (2006). Developmental changes in uncertainty monitoring during an event recall task. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 213–228. doi: 10.1007/s11409-010-9063-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wiebe, S. A., Espy, K. A., & Charak, D. (2008). Using confirmatory factor analysis to understand executive control in preschool children: I. Latent structure. Developmental Psychology, 44, 575–587. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.57518331145.Google Scholar
  96. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice. The educational psychology series (pp. 277–304). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  97. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. (2008). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudia M. Roebers
    • 1
    Email author
  • Patrizia Cimeli
    • 1
  • Marianne Röthlisberger
    • 1
  • Regula Neuenschwander
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Cognition, Learning, and Memory & School of PsychologyUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations