Advertisement

Metacognition and Learning

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 207–228 | Cite as

“How do I remember when I got my dog?” The structure and development of children’s metamemory

  • Kristina FritzEmail author
  • Pauline Howie
  • Sabina Kleitman
Article

Abstract

Kreutzer et al.’s (Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 40(1):1–60, 1975) metamemory interview has been widely used in children’s metamemory literature, yet the psychometric properties of the measure have yet to be reported, and the format and language of some subtests may pose problems for young children. Researchers often combine subtests with other tests purported to measure metamemory, yet there is little empirical data regarding how these subtests relate. It has been proposed that metamemory is comprised of distinct procedural and declarative components, but this has not been empirically tested in young children. Therefore, the two studies reported here aimed to adapt Kreutzer et al.’s interview to increase its developmental appropriateness, to examine the relationship between the interview subtests, to add subtests that purport to test procedural metamemory, and then to examine the factor structure of the resulting scores and investigate how metamemory changes with age across the elementary school years. The results suggest that the adapted versions of the subtests are generally less contaminated by language ability, especially for the younger children. Factor analysis indicated the presence of two declarative metamemory factors and one procedural metamemory factor. Both declarative factors followed a similar developmental trajectory, increasing steadily from early to late elementary school age, whereas procedural metamemory increased significantly between Grades 1 and 3 only.

Keywords

Metamemory Developmental 

References

  1. Allwood, C. M., Jonsson, A.-C., & Granhag, P. A. (2005). The effects of source and type of feedback on child witnesses’ metamemory accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allwood, C. M., Granhag, P. A., & Jonsson, A.-C. (2006). Child witnesses’ metamemory realism. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47(6), 461–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allwood, C. M., Innes-Ker, A. H., Homgren, J., & Fredin, G. (2008). Children’s and adults’ realism in their event-recall confidence in responses to free recall and focused questions. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14(6), 529–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belmont, J. M., & Borkowski, J. G. (1988). A group-administered test of children’s metamemory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26(3), 206–208.Google Scholar
  5. Bjorklund, D. F., Miller, P. H., Coyle, T. R., & Slawinski, J. L. (1997). Instructing children to use memory strategies: evidence of utilization deficiencies in memory training studies. Developmental Review, 17(4), 411–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borkowski, J. G., Ryan, E. B., Kurtz, B. E., & Reid, M. K. (1983). Metamemory and metalinguistic development: Correlates of children’s intelligence and achievement. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society.Google Scholar
  7. Bothwell, R. K., Deffenbacher, K. A., & Brigham, J. C. (1987). Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: optimality hypothesis revisited. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4), 691–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carvajal, H. H., Parks, J. P., Logan, R. A., & Page, G. L. (1992). Comparisons of the IQ and vocabulary scores on Wechsler Preschool and primary scale of intelligence—revised and Peabody picture vocabulary test—revised. Psychology in the Schools, 29(1), 22–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavanaugh, J. C., & Borkowski, J. G. (1980). Searching for metamemory-memory connections: a developmental study. Developmental Psychology, 16(5), 441–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cavanaugh, J. C., & Perlmutter, M. (1982). Metamemory: a critical examination. Child Development, 53(1), 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornoldi, C., Gobbo, C., & Mazzoni, G. (1991). On metamemory-memory relationship: strategy availability and training. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 14(1), 101–121.Google Scholar
  12. Cox, B. D. (1994). Children’s use of mnemonic strategies: variability in response to metamemory training. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 155(4), 423–442.Google Scholar
  13. Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Childhood development metacognition. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Bloomington: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar
  15. Flavell, J. (1971). First discussant’s comments: what is memory development the development of? Human Development, 14(4), 272–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flavell, J. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1977). Metamemory. In R. V. Kail & J. W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognitions. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Garner, R. (1990). When children and adults do not use learning strategies: toward a theory of settings. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 517–529.Google Scholar
  18. Geddie, L., Fradin, S., & Beer, J. (2000). Child characteristics which impact accuracy of recall and suggestibility in preschoolers: is age the best predictor? Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(2), 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hart, J. (1965). Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. Journal of Education & Psychology, 56(4), 208–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Howie, P., & Roebers, C. M. (2007). Developmental progression in the confidence-accuracy relationship in event recall: insights provided by a calibration perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(7), 871–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Isingrini, M., Perrotin, A., & Souchay, C. (2008). Aging, metamemory regulation and executive functioning. Progress in Brain Research, 169, 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Juslin, P., Olsson, N., & Winman, A. (1996). Calibration and diagnosticity of confidence in eyewitness identification: Comments on what can be inferred from the low confidence-accuracy correlation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(5), 1304–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103(3), 490–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kreutzer, M. A., Leonard, C., & Flavell, J. H. (1975). An interview study of children’s knowledge about memory. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40(1), 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuhn, D. (2000). Theory of mind, metacognition, and reasoning: A life-span perspective. Mitchell, P. & Riggs, K. J. (Ed.), Children’s reasoning and the mind (pp. 301–326). England: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  26. Kurtz, B. E., Reid, M. K., Borkowski, J. G., & Cavanaugh, J. C. (1982). On the reliability and validity of children’s metamemory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 19(3), 137–140.Google Scholar
  27. Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2007). Knowledge about the mind: links between theory of mind and later metamemory. Child Development, 78(1), 148–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lyons, K., & Ghetti, S. (2008). Preschoolers introspect on subjective certainty: Metacognitive development in early childhood. Paper presented at the EARLI: Metacognition: Ioannina.Google Scholar
  29. Maki, R. H., Shields, M., Wheeler, A. E., & Zacchilli, T. L. (2005). Individual differences in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Education & Psychology, 97(4), 723–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. E. S. Metcalfe, Arthur P (Ed), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. (pp. 1-25) MA, US: The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Paris, S. G. (2002). When is metacognition helpful, debilitating, or benign? In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, P.-J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, vol. 2002 (pp. 281).Google Scholar
  32. Pierce, S. H., & Lange, G. (2000). Relationships among metamemory, motivation and memory performance in young school-age children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(1), 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Robinson, M. D., Johnson, J. T., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Process versus content in eyewitness metamemory monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 6(3), 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roderer, T., & Roebers, C. M. (2009). Children’s strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Hauppauge: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  35. Roebers, C. M., & Howie, P. (2003). Confidence judgments in event recall: developmental progression in the impact of question format. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85(4), 352–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roebers, C. M., Gelhaar, T., & Schneider, W. (2004). “It’s magic!” The effects of presentation modality on children’s event memory, suggestibility, and confidence judgments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87(4), 320–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roebers, C. M., von der Linden, N., Schneider, W., & Howie, P. (2007). Children’s metamemorial judgments in an event recall task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schlagmuller, M., & Schneider, W. (2002). The development of organizational strategies in children: evidence from a microgenetic longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81(3), 298–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schneider, W. (1999). The development of metamemory in children. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 487–514). MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  40. Schneider, W., & Weinert, F. E. (1995). Memory development during early and middle childhood: Findings from the Munich Longitudinal Study (LOGIC). In F. E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Memory performance and competencies: Issues in growth and development (pp. 263–279). NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  41. Schneider, W., & Lockl, K. (2008). Procedural metacognition in children: Evidence for developmental trends. In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of metamemory and memory. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  42. Schneider, W., Korkel, J., & Weinert, F. E. (1987). The effects of intelligence, self-concept, and attributional style on metamemory and memory behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 10(3), 281–299.Google Scholar
  43. Schneider, W., Korkel, J., & Weinert, F. E. (1990). Expert knowledge, general abilities, and text processing. In W. Schneider & F. E. Weinert (Eds.), Interactions among aptitudes, strategies, and knowledge in cognitive performance (pp. 235–251). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  44. Schwanenflugel, P. J., Stevens, T. P. M., & Carr, M. (1997). Metacognitive knowledge of gifted children and non identified children in early elementary school. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scullin, M. H., & Ceci, S. J. (2001). A suggestibility scale for children. Personality and Individual Differences Vol 30(5) Apr 2001, 843–856.Google Scholar
  46. Swanson, H. (1989). The effects of central processing strategies on learning disabled, mildly retarded, average, and gifted children's elaborative encoding abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47(3), 370–397.Google Scholar
  47. Weingardt, K. R., Leonesio, R., & Loftus, E. F. (1994). Viewing eyewitness research from a metacognitive perspective. In J. E. S. Metcalfe & P. Arthur (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 157–184). MA: MIT.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristina Fritz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pauline Howie
    • 1
  • Sabina Kleitman
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations