Metacognition and Learning

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 137–156 | Cite as

The role of metacognitive skills in developing critical thinking

Article

Abstract

The study investigated the influence of metacognition on critical thinking skills. It is hypothesized in the study that critical thinking occurs when individuals use their underlying metacognitive skills and strategies that increase the probability of a desirable outcome. The Metacognitive Assessment Inventory (MAI) by Schraw and Dennison (Contemporary Educational Psychology 19:460–475, 1994), which measures regulation of cognition and knowledge of cognition, and the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) with the factors inference, recognition of assumptions, deduction, interpretations, and evaluation of arguments were administered to 240 college students from different universities in the National Capital Region in the Philippines. The Structural Equations Modeling (SEM) was used to determine the effect of metacognition on critical thinking as latent variables. Two models were tested: (1) In the first model, metacognition is composed of two factors while (2) in the second model, metacognition has eight factors as they affect critical thinking. The results indicated that in both models, metacognition has a significant path to critical thinking, p < .05. The analysis also showed that for both metacognition and critical thinking, all underlying factors are significant. The second model had a better goodness of fit as compared with the first as shown by the RMSEA value and other fit indices.

Keywords

Critical thinking Metacognition 

References

  1. Allen, B. A., & Armour-Thomas, E. (1993). Construct validation of metacognition. The Journal of Psychology, 127, 203–220.Google Scholar
  2. Artzt, A. F., & Armour-Thomas, E. (1992). Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 9(2), 137–175.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1(12), 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beyer, B. K. (1984). Improving thinking skills-defining the problem. Phi Delta Kappan, 65, 486–490.Google Scholar
  5. Bernard, R. M., Zhang, D., Abrami, P. C., Sicoly, F., Borokhovski, E., & Surkes, M. A. (2008). Exploring the structure of the watson–glaser critical thinking appraisal: one scale or many subscales? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Black, S. (2005). Teaching students to think critically. The Education Digest, 70(6), 42–47.Google Scholar
  7. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, T. (2004). Critical thinking and learning: An encyclopedia for parents and teachers: Bloom’s taxonomy and critical thinking. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cheng, P. (1993). Metacognition and giftedness: the state of the relationship. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(3), 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Choy, S. C., & Cheah, P. K. (2009). Teacher perceptions of critical thinking among students and its influence on higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 198–206.Google Scholar
  11. Dahl, B. (2004). Analysing cognitive learning processes through group interviews of successful high school pupils: development and use of a model. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(2/3), 129–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Carvalho, M. (2001). From socrates to neuropsychology: a review on metacognition. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education—Hiroshima University, 49, 311–320.Google Scholar
  13. de Carvalho, M. K., & Yuzawa, M. (2001). The effects of social cues on confidence judgments mediated by knowledge and regulation of cognition. The Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & Buysse, A. (2001). Metacognition and mathematical problem solving in grade 3. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fang, Z., & Cox, B. E. (1999). Emergent metacognition: a study of preschoolers’ literate behavior. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 13, 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinerty & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21–29). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking across domains: dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. High, M. H. (1991). Assessing the effect of high school lessons in thinking skills. High School Journal, 75(1), 34–39.Google Scholar
  22. Israel, S. E., Bauserman, K. L., & Block, C. C. (2005). Metacognitive assessment strategies. Thinking Classroom, 6(2), 21–29.Google Scholar
  23. Johnson, B. (2001). Toward a new classification of non experimental quantitative research. Educational Researcher, 30, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kogut, L. S. (1996). Critical thinking in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(3), 218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2004). Metacognition: a bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 268–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Magno, C. (2008). Reading strategy, amount of writing, metacognition, metamemory, and apprehension as predictors of English written proficiency. Asian EFL Journal, 29, 15–48.Google Scholar
  28. Magno, C. (2009). Investigating the effect of school ability on self-efficacy, learning approaches, and metacogntion. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(2), 233–244.Google Scholar
  29. Magno, C., & Lajom, J. (2008). Self-regulation, self-efficacy, metacognition, and achievement goals in high school and college adolescents. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 41, 1–23.Google Scholar
  30. Magno, C., Tangco, N., Cabangon, M., & Crisostomo, F. (2008). Looking at early adolescents’ temperament dimensions and metacognition. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 41, 55–75.Google Scholar
  31. Mayer, R., & Goodchild, F. (1990). The critical thinker. New York: Wm. C. Brown.Google Scholar
  32. Modjeski, R. B., & Michael, W. B. (1983). An evaluation by a panel ofpsychologists of the reliability and validity of two tests of critical thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43(4), 1187–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moss, P. A., & Kozdiol, S. M. (1991). Investigating the validity of a locally developed critical thinking test. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, 10(3), 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Newman, D. R., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1995). A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 3(2), 56–77.Google Scholar
  35. Nickerson, R. S. (1994). The teaching of thinking and problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving (pp. 121–132). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  36. Ong, P., Liao, V., & Alimon, R. (2009). Moderating language and number of mathematical operations in the relationship between problem solving scores and learning strategies. TESOL Journal, 1, 58–78.Google Scholar
  37. Orion, N., & Kali, Y. (2005). The effect of an earth-science learning program on students’ scientific thinking skills. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 387–394.Google Scholar
  38. Paris, S., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15–51). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Paul, R. (1995). Critical thinking: How to prepare students for a rapidly changing world. California: Foundation for Critical Thinking.Google Scholar
  40. Pintrich, P. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 219–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C., & Baxter, G. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 43–97). Lincoln: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.Google Scholar
  42. Ridley, D. S., Schults, P. A., Glanz, R. S., & Weinstein, C. E. (1992). Self-regulated learning: the interactive influences of metacognitive awareness and goals setting. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 293–306.Google Scholar
  43. Schoen, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  44. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). Episodes and executive decisions in mathematical problem solving. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 345–395). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  45. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Making sense of “out loud” problem-solving protocols. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 4, 171–191.Google Scholar
  46. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What’s all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189–215). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  47. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schroyens, W. (2005). Knowledge and thought: an introduction to critical thinking. Experimental Psychology, 52(2), 163–164.Google Scholar
  49. Tuovinen, J. E., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 334–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Veenman, M. V. J., & Elshout, J. J. (1999). Changes in the relation between cognitive and metacognitive skills during the acquisition of expertise. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Watson, G., & Glaser, E. M. (1980). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal. San Antonio: Psychological Corp.Google Scholar
  52. Watson, G., & Glaser, E. M. (2008). Watson-glaser critical thinking appraisal: short form manual. NY: Pearson.Google Scholar
  53. Watson, G., & Glaser, E. M. (2009). Watson-glaser II critical thinking appraisal: Technical manual and user’s guide. NY: Pearson.Google Scholar
  54. Whitebread, D., et al. (2009). The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition Learning, 4, 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Winn, W., & Snyder, D. (1996). Cognitive perspectives in psychology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communication and technology (pp. 112–142). New York: Simon & Schuster MacMillan.Google Scholar
  56. Yildiz, E., Akpinar, E., Tatar, N., & Ergin, O. (2009). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the metacognition scale for primary school students. Educational Sciences: theory and practice, 9(3), 1591–1604.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of the Counseling and Educational Psychology DepartmentDe La Salle University-ManilaManilaPhilippines

Personalised recommendations