Advertisement

Metacognition and Learning

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 113–120 | Cite as

Epistemology, metacognition, and self-regulation: musings on an emerging field

  • Barbara K. HoferEmail author
  • Gale M. Sinatra
Article

Abstract

The contributors to this special issue explore the connections between metacognition and personal epistemology. This commentary on the five articles addresses definitional concerns regarding both epistemology and metacognition, discusses the conceptual relation between the constructs, critiques methodological approaches, and suggests developmental considerations in this type of research.

Keywords

Epistemology Epistemic beliefs Metacognition Self-regulation 

References

  1. Alexander, P. A. (2008). Why this and why know? Introduction to the special issue on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 369–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, P. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (2007). First steps: Scholars’ promising movements into a nascent field of inquiry. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Re-framing the problem of conceptual change in learning and instruction (pp. 221–236). The Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, P. A., Sperl, C. T., Buehl, M. M., Fives, H., & Chiu, S. (2004). Modeling domain learning: profiles from the field of special education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 545–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: the development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2005). Motivation and performance differences in students’ domain-specific epistemological belief profiles. American Education Research Journal, 42, 697–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buehl, M. M., Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (2002). Beliefs about schooled knowledge: domain specific or domain general? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 415–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burr, J. E., & Hofer, B. K. (2002). Personal epistemology and theory of mind: deciphering young children’s beliefs about knowledge and knowing. New Ideas in Psychology, 20, 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 7–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. DeBacker, T. K., Crowson, H. M., Beesley, A. D., Thoma, S. J., & Hestevold, N. (2008). The challenges of measuring epistemic beliefs: an analysis of three self-report instruments. Journal of Experimental Education, 76(3), 281–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  12. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive development (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Hacker, D. J. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: implications for learning and teaching. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39, 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hofer, B. K. (2006). Beliefs about knowledge and knowing: Integrating domain specificity and domain generality: A response to Muis, Bendixen, and Haerle (2006). Educational Psychology Review, 18(1), 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hofer, B. K. (2008). Personal epistemology and culture. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: epistemological studies across diverse cultures (pp. 3–22). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Hofer, B. K. (in press). Epistemology, learning, and cultural context: Japan and the U.S. In M. B. Baxter Magolda, E. Creamer & P. Meszaros (Eds.), Refining understanding and assessment of the development of self-authorship. Sterling, VA: Stylus.Google Scholar
  20. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88–140.Google Scholar
  21. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Personal epistemology: the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  22. Karabenick, S. A., & Moosa, S. (2005). Culture and personal epistemology: U.S. and Middle Eastern students’ beliefs about scientific knowledge and knowing. Social Psychology of Education, 8, 375–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: the interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Muis, K. R. (2007). The rope of ipistemic beliefs in self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 42, 173–190.Google Scholar
  26. Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., & Haerle, F. C. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 3–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Patrick, H., & Pintrich, P. R. (2001). Conceptual change in teachers’ intuitive conceptions of learning, motivation, and instruction: the role of motivational and epistemological beliefs. In B. Torff & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Understanding and teaching the intuitive mind: student and teacher learning (pp. 117–143). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekarts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  29. Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: the role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). San Diego: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Royce, J. R. (1967). Metaphoric knowledge and humanistic psychology. In J. T. F. Bugental (Ed.), Challenges of humanistic psychology (pp. 21–28). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  31. Royce, J. R. (1978). Three ways of knowing and the scientific world view. Methodology and Science, 11, 146–164.Google Scholar
  32. Schommer, M., Crouse, A., & Rhodes, N. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 435–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schunk, D. L. (2008). Metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning: Research recommendations. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 463–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tabak, I., & Weinstock, M. (2008). In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge, and beliefs: epistemology across diverse cultures. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekarts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulated learning (pp. 531–566). San Diego, CA: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Middlebury CollegeMiddleburyUSA
  2. 2.University of Nevada, Las VegasLas VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations