Metacognition and Learning

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 87–95 | Cite as

Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in research on metacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion

  • Roger Azevedo


Learning typically involves the use of numerous self-regulatory processes such as planning, knowledge activation, metacognitive monitoring and regulation, and reflection (Azevedo 2009; Azevedo and Hadwin 2005; Graesser et al. 2005; Schraw 2006; Veenman et al. 2006; Zimmerman 2008). According to Pintrich (2000), self-regulated learning (SRL) is an active, constructive process whereby students set goals for their learning and then attempt to monitor, regulate, and control their cognition, motivation, and behavior guided and constrained by their goals and the contextual features in the environment. Most models of SRL propose a general time-ordered sequence that students follow as they perform a task, but there is no strong assumption that the various phases (such as planning, monitoring, control) are hierarchically or linearly structured such that earlier phases must occur before later phases (see Ainley and Patrick 2006; Azevedo and Witherspoon 2009; Boekaerts et al. 2000;...


Metacognition Self-regulated learning Methodology Theory Models Instruction 



The preparation of this commentary was supported by funds from the National Science Foundation (DRL 0633918 and IIS 0841835).


  1. Ainley, M., & Patrick, L. (2006). Measuring self-regulated learning processes through tracking patterns of student interaction with achievement activities. Educational Psychology Review, 18(3), 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azevedo, R. (2008). The role of self-regulation in learning about science with hypermedia. In D. Robinson & G. Schraw (Eds.), Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning (pp. 127–156). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Azevedo, R., Greene, J. A., & Moos, D. C. (2007). The effect of a human agent’s external regulation upon college students’ hypermedia learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2(2/3), 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33, 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azevedo, R., & Witherspoon, A. M. (2009). Self-regulated use of hypermedia. In A. Graesser, J. Dunlosky & D. Hacker (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, D., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback as self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Review, 65, 245–281.Google Scholar
  8. Dunlosky, J., & Bjork, R. (2008). Handbook of metamemory and memory. NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  9. Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Graesser, A., McNamara, D., & VanLehn, K. (2005). Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through Point and Query, AutoTutor and iSTART. Educational Psychologist, 40, 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin’s model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 334–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.). (1998).Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of metacognition in education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum (in press).Google Scholar
  15. Hadwin, A., Nesbit, J., Jamieson-Noel, D., Code, J., & Winne, P. (2007). Examining trace data to explore self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leelawong, K., & Biswas, G. (2008). Designing learning by teaching agents: The Betty’s Brain System. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 18(3), 181–208.Google Scholar
  17. Pintrich, P. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M., Boekaerts, P., Pintrich, M., & Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pieschl, S. (2009). Metacognitive calibration—An extended conceptualization and potential applications. Metacognition and Learning Google Scholar
  19. Schraw, G. (2006). Knowledge: Structures and processes. In P., Alexander, P., & Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 245–263). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Schraw, G. (2007). The use of computer-based environments for understanding and improving g self-regulation. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schraw, G. (2009). A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning Google Scholar
  22. Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schunk, D. (2001). Social cognitive theory of self-regulated learning. In B., Zimmerman, D., & Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 125–152). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Schunk, D. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shamir, A., Mevarech, Z., & Gida, C. (2009). The assessment of young children’s metacognition in different contexts: Individualized vs. peer assisted learning. Metacognition and Learning Google Scholar
  26. Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Veenman, M. V. J. (2007). The assessment and instruction of self-regulation in computer-based environments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Pasternak, P., Sangster, C., Grau, V., Bingham, S. et al. (2009). The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning Google Scholar
  29. Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B., Zimmerman, D., & Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153–189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Winne, P. (2005). Key issues on modeling and applying research on self-regulated learning. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 232–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Winne, P., & Hadwin, A. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Winne, P., & Hadwin, A. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D., Schunk, B., & Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 297–314). NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  33. Winne, P., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M., Boekaerts, P., Pintrich, & M., Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. Zimmerman, B. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B., Zimmerman, D., & Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1–25). NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  35. Zimmerman, B. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. Zimmerman, & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Development and adaptation of expertise: The role of self-regulatory processes and beliefs. In K. A., Ericsson, N., Charness, P. J., Feltovich, R. R., & Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 705–722). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Zimmerman, B. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Journal of International Research, 45, 166–183.Google Scholar
  38. Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Institute for Intelligent SystemsUniversity of MemphisMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations