Why not use SDF rather than beta models in performance measurement?
- 248 Downloads
This paper analyzes performance measurement based on stochastic discount factors, compared to beta models traditionally used in computing funds’ (Jensen) alphas. From a theoretical point of view, standard alphas suffer from several limitations. Our paper addresses this issue from an empirical point of view using a sample of Swiss mutual funds from 2000 to 2011. Our results suggest that the key for a “fair” comparison between stochastic discount function (SDF) and beta models is the specification of the set of primitive assets used to calibrate the SDF function. Once this is established, the size of (absolute) performance differences considerably decreases between the two model families. However, there are sizeable performance deviations in the cross-section of funds if conditioning information is incorporated in the tests, up to some 20 basis points per month, or about 2.3 % per year. In almost all cases, the SDF-alphas are lower than the standard (Jensen) alphas. In absolute terms, the average SDF-based underperformance of the funds is way larger than the average total expense ratio (TER) of the funds, both in a conditional and unconditional setting.
KeywordsPerformance measurement Conditioning information Mutual funds
JEL ClassificationG12 G23
- Bakshi, G., Chen, Z.: Asset pricing without consumption or market portfolio data. Working Paper, College Park, University of Maryland (1998)Google Scholar
- Cochrane, J.: Asset Pricing. Princeton University Press, New Jersey (2001)Google Scholar
- Ferson, W., Lin, J.: Alpha and performance measurement: the effect of investor heterogeneity. Working Paper (2012)Google Scholar
- Ferson, W., Qian, M.: Conditional performance evaluation: revisited. Working Paper, Boston College (2004)Google Scholar
- Ferson, W.: Investment Performance: a review and synthesis. In: Constantinides, G., Harris, M., Stulz, R. (eds.) Handbook of Economics and Finance (2012)Google Scholar
- Garrett, I., Hyde, S., Lozano, M.: Trade-offs between efficiency and robustness in the empirical evaluation of asset pricing models. Working Paper (2011)Google Scholar
- Griese, K., Kempf, A.: Lohnt aktives Fondsmanagement aus Anlegersicht? Ein Vergleich von Anlagestrategien in aktiv und passiv verwalteten Aktienfonds. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 73, 201–224 (2003)Google Scholar
- Kan, R., Zhou, G.: Empirical asset pricing: the beta method versus the stochastic discount factor method. Working Paper. University of Toronto and Washington University, St. Louis (2002)Google Scholar