Skip to main content
Log in

Portfolio risk management in a data-rich environment

  • Published:
Financial Markets and Portfolio Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study risk assessment using an optimal portfolio in which the weights are functions of latent factors and firm-specific characteristics (hereafter, diffusion index portfolio). The factors are used to summarize the information contained in a large set of economic data and thus reflect the state of the economy. First, we evaluate the performance of the diffusion index portfolio and compare it to both that of a portfolio in which the weights depend only on firm-specific characteristics and an equally weighted portfolio. We then use value-at-risk, expected shortfall, and downside probability to investigate whether the weights-modeling approach, which is based on factor analysis, helps reduce market risk. Our empirical results clearly indicate that using economic factors together with firm-specific characteristics helps protect investors against market risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amemiya, Y.: Instrumental variable estimation for nonlinear factor analysis. In: Cuadras, C.M., Rao, C.R. (eds.) Multivariate Analysis: Future Directions, vol. 2, pp. 113–129 Amesterdam, Elsevier (1993a)

  • Amemiya, Y.: On nonlinear factor analysis. Proc Soc Stat Sect Annu Meet Am Stat Assoc 92–96, 290–294 (1993b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, Y., Yalcin, I.: Nonlinear factor analysis as a statistical method. Stat Sci 16, 275–294 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, J., Ng, S.: Determining the number of factors in approximate factor models. Econometrica 70, 191–221 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, J., Ng, S.: Confidence intervals for diffusion index forecasts and inference for factor-augmented regressions. Econometrica 74, 1133–1150 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benzoni, L., Collin-Dufresne, P., Goldstein, R.S.: Portfolio choice over the life-cycle when the stock and labor markets are cointegrated. J Finance 62, 2123–2167 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B., Kuttner, K.: What explains the stock market’s reaction to Federal Reserve policy. J Finance 60, 1221–1257 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouaddi, M., Taamouti, A.: Portfolio selection in a data-rich environment. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Working Paper (2011)

  • Brandt, M.W., Santa-Clara, P.: Dynamic portfolio selection by augmenting the asset space. J Finance 61, 2187–2217 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, M.W., Santa-Clara, P., Valkanov, R.: Parametric portfolio policies: exploiting characteristics in the cross section of equity returns. Rev Financial Stud 22, 3411–3447 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briec, W., Kerstens, K., Jokung, O.: Mean-variance-skewness portfolio performance gauging: a general shortage function and dual approach. Manag Sci 53, 135–149 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, J., Daubechies, I., De Mol, C., Giannone, D., Loris, I.: Sparse and stable Markowitz portfolios. PNAS 106, 12267–12272 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascon, A., Keating, C., Shadwick, W.: The Omega function. Finance Development Centre, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, J.H., Piazzesi, M.: Bond risk premia. Am Econ Rev 95, 138–160 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farinelli, S., Tibiletti, L.: Sharpe thinking in asset ranking with one-sided measures. Eur J Oper Res 185, 1542–1547 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, M.J., Protopapadakis, A.A.: Macroeconomic factors do influence aggregate stock returns. Rev Financial Stud 15, 751–782 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoriou, A., Kontonikas, A., MacDonald, R., Montagnoli, A.: Monetary policy shocks and stock returns: evidence from the British market. Financial Markets Portfolio Manag 23, 401–410 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, J., Ng, L.: Economic forces, fundamental variables, and equity returns. J Bus 67, 599–609 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, M.: Sector specific impacts of macroeconomic fundamentals on the Swiss stock market. Financial Markets Portfolio Manag 17, 234–245 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand, P.M.: Monetary policy and financial markets. Financial Markets Portfolio Manag 20, 7–18 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzur, T., Spierdijk, L.: Stock returns and inflation risk: implications for portfolio selection. University of Groningen Working Paper (2010)

  • Konrad, E.: The impact of monetary policy surprises on asset return volatility: the case of Germany. Financial Markets Portfolio Manag 23, 111–135 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludvigson, S.C., Ng, S.: Macro factors in bond risk premia. Rev Financial Stud 22, 5027–5067 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.: Portfolio selection. J Finance 7, 77–91 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangvid, J.: Output and expected returns. J Financial Econ 81, 595–624 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigobon, R., Sack, B.: Measuring the reaction of monetary policy to the stock market. Q J Econ 118, 639–670 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W.F.: Mutual fund performance. J Bus 39, 119–138 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sortino, F., van der Meer, R., Plantinga, A.: The Dutch triangle. J Portfolio Manag 26, 50–57 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Specht, K., Gohout, W.: Portfolio selection using the principal components GARCH model. Financial Markets Portfolio Manag 17, 450–458 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J.H., Watson, M.W.: Macroeconomic forecasting using diffusion indexes. J Bus Econ Stat 20, 147–162 (2002a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J.H., Watson, M.W.: Forecasting using principal components from a large number of predictors. J Am Stat Assoc 97, 1167–1179 (2002b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank an anonymous referee and the Co-Editor Markus Schmid for their very helpful comments. We also thank Kenneth French and Mark Watson for making the data available to us. The first author acknowledges financial support from IFM2, Montreal, and the second author acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Education through Grants SEJ 2011-0031-001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abderrahim Taamouti.

Appendix: Additional estimation results

Appendix: Additional estimation results

See Figs. 1, 2, , 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and Tables  5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.

Table 5 Estimation results for portfolio policy function (weight)
Table 6 Estimation results for portfolio policy function

 

Table 7 Estimation results for portfolio policy function

 

Table 8 Estimation results for portfolio policy function

 

Table 9 This table shows the descriptive statistics that correspond to an out-of-sample prediction of DFI, IC, and EW portfolio returns

 

Table 10 This table reports the sharpe ratio (SR), (Sharpe 1966), and the FT ratios, (Farinelli and Tibiletti 2008), that correspond to an out-of-sample prediction of DFI, IC, and EW portfolio returns

 

Table 11 This table shows the average of portfolio weights in low and high portfolio return statistics (mean, standard-deviation, skewness) that correspond to an out-of-sample prediction of DFI, IC, and EW portfolio returns

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bouaddi, M., Taamouti, A. Portfolio risk management in a data-rich environment. Financ Mark Portf Manag 26, 469–494 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-012-0199-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-012-0199-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation