Financial Markets and Portfolio Management

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 169–192 | Cite as

Sports betting as a new asset class—current market organization and options for development

  • Peter GomberEmail author
  • Peter Rohr
  • Uwe Schweickert


New asset classes are originally distributed via over the counter channels; mostly negotiated, traded, and settled on a bilateral and ad-hoc basis. Subsequently, the demand for organized market services grows alongside trading volumes, number of market participants, and distribution reach. This paper focuses on sports betting as a new asset class and uses the analogies between the development of traditional and new asset classes as a framework to extend market organization. The first section motivates sports betting as a new asset class based on its economic relevance. In Sect. 2, the European market is described by product design, distribution platforms, and regulatory environment. In Sect. 3, we discuss the dimensions of market model, technology, and regulation as prerequisites to develop organized markets. Against this background, we compare the value chain in financial and sports betting markets to identify and describe three options for development: a regulated market environment, an inter-bookmaker platform, and central counterparty clearing services.


Sports betting Regulated market CCP clearing Inter-bookmaker platform Market microstructure 

JEL Classification

G10 D40 D51 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alber, S.: Freier Dienstleistungsverkehr auch für Glücksspiele? Zur Rechtsprechung des EuGH zum Glücksspielbereich, Die Zukunft des Glücksspiels im Binnenmarkt—Das Ende der staatlichen Monopole? Trier (2007) Google Scholar
  2. Baryla, E.A., Borghesi, R.A., Dare, W.H., Dennis, S.A.: Learning, price formation and the early season bias in the NBA. Finance Res. Lett. 4, 155–164 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernanke, B.S.: Clearing and settlement during the crash. Rev. Financ. Stud. 3(1), 133–151 (1990) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Betfair: (2007)
  5. Black, F.: Towards a fully automated exchange. Financ. Anal. J. 27, 29–35 (1971); and November–December, pp. 25–28, 86–87 Google Scholar
  6. Bliss, R.R., Steigerwald, R.S.: Derivatives clearing and settlement: A comparison of central counterparties and alternative structures. In: Economic Perspectives. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (2006) Google Scholar
  7. Böhmer, J., Mülbert, P.O.: Ereignisbezogene Finanzprodukte. Wertpapiermitteilungen 60(20/21) (2006) Google Scholar
  8. Booth, G.G., Iversen, P., Sarkar, S.K., Schmidt, H., Young, A.: Market structure and bid-ask spreads: IBIS vs Nasdaq. Eur. J. Finance 5(1), 51–71 (1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christie, W.G., Schultz, P.H.: Why do Nasdaq market makers avoid odd-eight quotes? J. Finance 49(5), 1813–1840 (1994) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cox, P., Simpson, H., Jones, L.: The Future of Clearing and Settlement in Europe. Bourse Consult, London (2005) Google Scholar
  11. Deutsche Bank: Clearing and Settlement in the EU: Structures and Policy Options. Deutsche Bank, Frankfurt am Main (2003) Google Scholar
  12. Eurex: Risk Based Margining. Eurex Communications, Frankfurt am Main (2003) Google Scholar
  13. Eurex: Many Markets—One Clearinghouse. Frankfurt am Main (2006) Google Scholar
  14. European Association of Clearinghouses: Functional definition of a Central Counterparty Clearing House (CCP) (2004) Google Scholar
  15. European Central Bank: Issues related to central counterparty clearing. In: ECB-FED Chicago Conference (2007) Google Scholar
  16. European Commission: Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC. Off. J. Eur. Union L 145(1) Google Scholar
  17. French, K., Poterba, J.: International diversification and international equity markets. Am. Econ. Rev. 81(2), 222–226 (1991) Google Scholar
  18. Garman, M.B.: Market microstructure. J. Financ. Econ. 3, 257–275 (1976) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gizycki, J., Górny, A.: Glück im Spiel zu allen Zeiten. Dt. Fassung. Stauffacher Verlag, Zürich/Frankfurt (1970) Google Scholar
  20. Glosten, L.R.: Is the electronic open limit order book inevitable? J. Finance 49(4), 1127–1161 (1994) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glosten, L.: Insider trading, liquidity and the role of the monopolistic specialist. J. Bus. 62, 211–236 (1989) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gomber, P., Gsell, M.: Catching up with technology—the impact of regulatory changes on ECNS/MTFs and the trading venue landscape. Compet. Regul. Netw. Ind. 1(4), 535–557 (2005) Google Scholar
  23. Gomber, P., Budimir, M., Riess, R.: Market model convergence in equities trading. In: Bessler, W. (ed.) Börsen, Banken und Kapitalmärkte—Festschrift für Hartmut Schmidt, pp. 45–70. Duncker & Humblot GmbH, Berlin (2006a) Google Scholar
  24. Gomber, P., Budimir, M., Schweickert, U.: Volume discovery: Leveraging liquidity in the depth of an order driven market. Electron. Mark. 16(2), 101–111 (2006b) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harris, L.: Trading and Exchanges. Oxford and New York (2003) Google Scholar
  26. Hayer, T., Meyer, G.: The addictive potential of sports betting. Sucht 49(4), 212–220 (2003) Google Scholar
  27. Hayer, T., Meyer, G.: The prevention of problem gambling—a multidimensional challenge. J. Public Health 12(5), 293–303 (2004) Google Scholar
  28. Hendershott, T., Jones, C.M.: Island goes dark: transparency, fragmentation and regulation. Review of financial studies, RFS Advance Access (January 2005) Google Scholar
  29. Hendershott, T., Mendelson, H.: Crossing networks and dealer markets: competition and performance. J. Finance 55, 2071–2116 (2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huang, R.D., Stoll, H.R.: Dealer versus auction markets: a paired comparison of execution costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE. J. Financ. Econ. 41(3), 313–357 (1996) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, R.: Capital markets that benefit investors. Oxford Finance Group (2002) Google Scholar
  32. Leinert Consult: Marktreport Wetten 2005—Wetten, Lotterie, Sportwetten und Casino. Frankfurt (2005) Google Scholar
  33. Lhabitant, F.S.: On Swiss timing and selectivity: in the quest for alpha. Financ. Mark. Portfolio Manag. 15(2), 154–172 (2001) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Light, R.: The gambling act 2005: regulatory containment and market control. Mod. Law Rev. 70(4), 626–653 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Loader, D.: Clearing and Settlement of Derivatives. Elsevier Finance, Amsterdam (2005) Google Scholar
  36. Madhavan, A.: Trading mechanisms in securities markets. J. Finance 52(2), 607–641 (1992) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mann, S., Venkataraman, K., Waisburd, A.: Stock liquidity and the value of a designated liquidity provider: Evidence from Euronext Paris. Working paper, Texas Christian University (2005) Google Scholar
  38. Marshall, B.R.: Arbitrage opportunities in sports betting markets. Working paper (2005) Google Scholar
  39. McKibbin, R.: Working-class gambling in Britain 1880–1939. Past Present 82, 147–178 (1979) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MECN: Betting exchanges—the eBay of the betting industry. A new era of betting in Europe? Munich/London (March 2004) Google Scholar
  41. MECN: Der deutsche Wettmarkt im Umbruch—Massives Wachstum oder Rückkehr zum alten Modell? Munich (September 2005) Google Scholar
  42. Mendelson, H.: Consolidation, fragmentation, and market performance. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 22(2), 189–207 (1987) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Milne, A.: The industrial organization of post-trade clearing and settlement. J. Bank. Finance 31, 2945–2961 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pagano, M., Röell, A.A.: Auction and dealership markets: what is the difference? Eur. Econ. Rev. 36(2–3), 613–623 (1992) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pagano, M., Röell, A.A.: Transparency and liquidity: a comparison of auction and dealer markets with informed trading. J. Finance 51(2), 579–611 (1996) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Preuß, A.: Electronic trading and market structure challenges for exchanges. Zeitschrift Bankrecht Bankwirtschaft 19, 152–155 (2007) Google Scholar
  47. Ripatti, K.: Central counterparty clearing: constructing a framework for evaluation of risks and benefits. Discussion papers 30, Bank of Finland (2004) Google Scholar
  48. Schmidt, H.: Wertpapierbörsen. Franz Vahlen, München (1988) Google Scholar
  49. Schwartz, R.A., Francioni, R.: Equity markets in action. New Jersey (2004) Google Scholar
  50. Schwartz, R., Davis, P., Pagano, M.: Markets in transition: looking back and peering forward. In: Bessler, W. (ed.) Börsen, Banken und Kapitalmärkte—Festschrift für Hartmut Schmidt, pp. 1–20. Duncker & Humblot GmbH, Berlin (2006) Google Scholar
  51. Sproston, E., Orford, J.: Gaming behaviour in Britain: Results from the British gaming prevalence survey. National Centre for Social Research, London (2000) Google Scholar
  52. Staatliche Sport-Toto GmbH Baden-Württemberg: 50 Jahre Toto-Lotto Baden-Württemberg. Stuttgart (1998) Google Scholar
  53. Swiss Institute of Comparative Law: European commission: Study of gambling services in the internal market of the European Union. Final report (2006) Google Scholar
  54. von Bubnoff, E.: Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch. Leipziger Kommentar, 27. Lfg., Sects. 284, 287 (1998) Google Scholar
  55. Ward, P.: The gambling bill. Research paper 04/79, House of Commons Library (October 2004) Google Scholar
  56. William Hill PLC: (2007)

Copyright information

© Swiss Society for Financial Market Research 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Business Administration, E-Finance LabJohann Wolfgang Goethe-UniversityFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations