We analyse time-varying risk premia and the implications for portfolio choice. Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, we estimate a multivariate regime-switching model for the Carhart (1997) four-factor model. We find two clearly separable regimes with different mean returns, volatilities, and correlations. In the High-Variance Regime, only value stocks deliver a good performance, whereas in the Low-Variance Regime, the market portfolio and momentum stocks promise high returns. Regime-switching induces investors to change their portfolio style over time depending on the investment horizon, the risk aversion, and the prevailing regime. Value investing seems to be a rational strategy in the High-Variance Regime, momentum investing in the Low-Variance Regime. An empirical out-of-sample backtest indicates that this switching strategy can be profitable, but the overall forecasting ability for the regime-switching model seems to be weak compared to the iid model.
Regime switching Style investing Markov Chain Monte Carlo Tactical asset allocation
JEL Classification Numbers
G11 G12 G14
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Congdon P. (2003) Applied Bayesian Modelling. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Cooper M.J., Gutierrez R.C., Hameed A. (2004) Market states and momentum. J. Financ. 59, 1345–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doukas J.A., Kim C., Pantzalias C. (2002) A test of the errors-in-expectations explanation of the value/glamour stock returns performance Evidence from analysts forecasts. J. Financ. 57, 2143–2165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans M.D.D. (1994) Expected returns, time-varying risk, and risk premia. J. Financ. 49(2): 655–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama E., French K. (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financ. Econ. 33, 3–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama E., French K. (1998) Value vs. growth: the international evidence. J. Financ. 52, 1975–1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar