Financial Markets and Portfolio Management

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 363–378 | Cite as

VaR for nonlinear financial instruments — linear approximation or full Monte Carlo?

  • Manuel Ammann
  • Christian Reich


Linear Approximation Financial Instrument 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ALBANESE, C., A. ALEXANDER and J. C. CHAO (1997): “Bayesian Value at Risk, Backtesting and Calibration”, Working Paper, October 1997, Toronto.Google Scholar
  2. BRUAND, M. (1996): “The jump-diffusion process in Swiss stock returns and its influence on option valuation”, Finanzmarkt und Portfolio Management, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 75–97.Google Scholar
  3. BOUDOUKH, J., M. RICHARDSON and R. WHITE-LAW (1998): “The best of both worlds”, Risk Magazine, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 64–67.Google Scholar
  4. DUFFIE, D., and J. PAN (1997): “An Overview of Value at Risk”, Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 7–44.Google Scholar
  5. FRANKE, G. (2000): “Gefahren kurzsichtigen Risikomanagements durch Value at Risk”; Working Paper, University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
  6. HULL, J. (1999): Options, futures and other derivatives; New York, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  7. HULL, J. and A. WHITE (1998): “Value at risk when Daily Changes in Market Variables are not Normally Distributed”, Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 9–19.Google Scholar
  8. JORION, P. (1996): Value at Risk: The new benchmark for controlling market risk; New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  9. READ, O. (1998): Parametrische Modelle zur Ermittlung des Value at Risk; Dissertation, University of Cologne.Google Scholar
  10. ROUVINEZ, C. (1997): “Going Greek with VaR”, Risk Magazine, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 57–65.Google Scholar
  11. STUDER, G. (1995): “Value at Risk and Maximum Loss Optimization”, Technical Report, Risk Lab, December 1995.Google Scholar
  12. STUDER, G. (1997): Maximum Loss for Measurement of Risk; Dissertation, ETH Zurich.Google Scholar
  13. VENKATARAMAN, S. (1997): “Value at Risk for a mixture of normal distributions: The use of quasi-Bayesian estimation techniques”, in: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives, March/April 1997, pp. 2–13.Google Scholar
  14. WILSON, T. (1998): “Value at Risk”, in: Alexander, C. (Editor): Risk Management and Analysis — Volume 1: Measuring and Modelling Financial Risk; Chichester (England), John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  15. ZANGARI, P. (1996a): “Market Risk Methodology”, Risk Metrics™ — Technical Document, 4th edition, pp. 105–148.Google Scholar
  16. ZANGARI, P. (1996b): “How accurate is the Delta Gamma Methodology?”, Risk Metrics™ — Monitor, 3rd quarter 1996, pp. 12–29.Google Scholar
  17. ZANGARI, P. (1996c): “A VaR Methodology for Portfolios that include Options”, Risk Metrics™ — Monitor, 1st quarter 1996, pp. 4–12.Google Scholar
  18. ZANGARI, P. (1996d): “An improved Methodology for Measuring VaR”, Risk Metrics™ — Monitor, 2nd quarter 1996, pp. 7–25.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss Society for Financial Market Research 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel Ammann
    • 1
  • Christian Reich
    • 2
  1. 1.University of California at BerkeleyBerkeley
  2. 2.University of BasleBasle

Personalised recommendations