International Journal of Hindu Studies

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 25–43 | Cite as

Ethics and Aesthetics in Early Modern South Asia: A Controversy Surrounding the Tenth Book of the Bhāgavata Purāṇa

Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Kṛṣṇa’s relationships with the Gopīs of Vraja, described in texts such as the Bhāgavata Purāṇa were controversial in the precolonial period. This paper first summarizes the teachings of Caitanya (1486–1534), the inaugurator of Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇavism who promoted the Purāṇa. The paper then discusses Rūpa’s Ujjvala- nīlamaṇi (sixteenth century) where he promotes Kṛṣṇa’s paramourship in relation to the Gopīs. This is followed by an analysis of both Jīva’s (sixteenth century) view on Kṛṣṇa’s matrimony with the Gopīs and the refutation of Jīva’s view in the Svakīyātvanirāsavicāra written by Viśvanātha Cakravartī (seventeenth century). By tracing the process of “transcreation” concerning Kṛṣṇa narratives, the paper demonstrates the complexity of this controversy, which continues even to the present day. In addition, the paper argues that the production of commentaries provided an intellectual outlet for Hindu theologians in early modern South Asia to express their own perspectives on controversial topics while remaining faithful within their tradition.

Keywords

GauḍīyaVaiṣṇavism Hindu theology paramourship matrimony early modern South Asia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank the following colleagues for their valuable comments on various parts of this paper: Diwakar Acharya (University of Oxford), David Buchta (Brown University), Bergljot Chiarucci (Kyoto University), Jonathan Edelmann (University of Florida), Kengo Harimoto (Mahidol University), Monika Horstmann (University of Heidelberg), Rembert Lutjeharms (Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies), Yuko Yokochi (Kyoto University), and Somdev Vasudeva (Kyoto University). I am also grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their comments. I am of course fully responsible for any errors that remain in this paper. My research has been supported by a JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (15K16726) and by the Hakubi Centre for Advanced Research, Kyoto University.

References

  1. Bhāgavata Purāṇa. 1983. Bhāgavata Purāṇa of Kṛṣṇa Dvaipāyana Vyāsa with Sanskrit Commentary Bhāvārthabodhinī of Srīdhara Svāmin (ed. J. L. Shastri). New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  2. Bose, Manindra Mohan. 1930. The Post-Caitanya Sahajiā Cult of Bengal. Calcutta: University of Calcutta.Google Scholar
  3. Brahmasaṃhitā. 1932. Shree Brahma-samhitā (Fifth Chapter) with Commentary by Shree Shreemad Jeeva Goswāmi and Translation and Purport by Shree Bhakti Siddhānta Sraswati Goswāmi. Madras: Shree Gauḍiya Math.Google Scholar
  4. Bryant, Edwin F. 2002. “The Date and Provenance of the Bhāgavata Purāṇa and the Vaikuṇṭha Perumāl Temple.” Journal of Vaishnava Studies 11, 1: 51–80.Google Scholar
  5. Bryant, Edwin F., trans. 2003. Krishna: The Beautiful Legend of God. Śrīmad Bhāgavata Purāṇa, Book X, with Chapters 1, 6 and 29–31 from Book XI. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  6. Brzezinski, Jan. 1992. “The Gopālacampū of Jīva Gosvāmin.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
  7. Brzezinski, Jan. 1997. “Does Kṛṣṇa Marry the Gopīs in the End?: The Svakīyā-Vāda of Jīva Gosvāmin.” Journal of Vaiṣṇava Studies 5, 4: 49–110.Google Scholar
  8. Burton, Adrian P. 2000. “Temples, Texts, and Taxes: The Bhagavad-gītā and the Politico-Religious Identity of the Caitanya Sect. An Archival and Textual Investigation into the Text and Times of the Sārārtha-varṣiṇī Commentary on the Bhagavad-gītā by Viśvanātha Cakravarti.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
  9. Coleman, Tracy. 2010. “Viraha-Bhakti and Strīdharma: Re-Reading the Story of Kṛṣṇa and the Gopīs in the Harivaṃśa and the Bhāgavata Purāṇa.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 130, 3: 385–412.Google Scholar
  10. Delmonico, Neal. 1993. “Rūpa Gosvāmin: His Life, Family and Early Vraja Commentators.” Journal of Vaiṣṇava Studies 1, 2: 133–57.Google Scholar
  11. Dimock, Edward. 1966. The Place of the Hidden Moon: Erotic Mysticism in the Vaiṣṇava-Sahajiyā Cult of Bengal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Edelmann, Jonathan. 2015. “The Cause of Devotion in Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava Theology: Devotion (bhakti) as the Result of Spontaneously (yadṛcchayā) Meeting a Devotee (sādhu-saṅga).” Journal of the American Oriental Society 135, 1: 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ganeri, Jonardon. 2011. The Lost Age of Reason: Philosophy in Early Modern India 1450–1700. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gautamīyatantra. 1927. Gautamīyatantram Maharṣipravara-Gautama-viracitam (ed. Satīścandra Mukhopādhyāya). Kalikata: Satīścandra Mukhopādhyāya.Google Scholar
  15. Gopālatāpanyupaniṣad. 1943. Śrī-śrī-Gopālatāpanī Upaniṣat: Śrīla-Viśvanātha-Cakravarti-kṛtayā vivṛtyā Śrīla-Baladeva-Vidyābhūṣaṇa kṛtena bhāṣyeṇa ca samalaṅkṛtam. Navadvipa: Haridāsa Dāsa.Google Scholar
  16. Gupta, Ravi M. 2007. The Caitanya Vaiṣṇava Vedānta of Jīva Gosvāmī: When Knowledge Meets Devotion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Hankins, James. 1990. Plato in the Italian Renaissance. Volume 1. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
  18. Horstmann, Monika. 2009. Der Zusammenhalt der Welt: Religiöse Herrschaftslegitimation und Religionspolitik Mahārājā Savāī Jaisinghs (1700–1743). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Hudson, D. Dennis. 1995. “The Śrīmad Bhāgavata Purāṇa in Stone: The Text as an Eighth-Century Temple and its Implications.” Journal of Vaishnava Studies 3, 3: 137–82.Google Scholar
  20. Kraye, Jill. 1994. “The Transformation of Platonic Love in the Italian Renaissance.” In Anna Baldwin and Sarah Hutton, eds., Platonism and the English Imagination, 76–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Okita, Kiyokazu. 2008. “A Caitanya Vaiṣṇava Response to the Nineteenth-Century Bengal Renaissance Movement According to the Works of Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura.” Religions of South Asia 2, 2: 195–214.Google Scholar
  22. Okita, Kiyokazu. 2014. Hindu Theology in Early Modern South Asia: The Rise of Devotionalism and the Politics of Genealogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Okita, Kiyokazu. Forthcoming. “When a Royal Paṇḍit is Refuted: Court, Conflict, and Controversy in Eighteenth Century Bengal (Tentative).” In Ferdinando Sardella and Lucian Wong, eds., Hinduism Beyond the Renaissance: Vaiṣṇavism in Colonial Bengal. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Reeser, Todd W. 2006. “Translation and the Antitheses of Same-Sex Sexuality in Leonardo Bruni.” Exemplaria: A Journal of Theory in Medieval and Renaissance Studies 18, 1: 31–66.Google Scholar
  25. Rūpa Gosvāmī. 1934. The Padyāvalī: An Anthology of Vaiṣṇava Verses in Sanskrit. Compiled by Rūpa Gosvāmin, a Disciple of Śrī-Kṛṣṇa-Caitanya of Bengal (ed. Sushil Kumar De). Dacca University Oriental Publications Series, No. 3. Dacca: The University of Dacca.Google Scholar
  26. Rūpa Gosvāmī. 1954. Śrī-śrī-Rūpa-Gosvāmi-prabhupāda-praṇītaḥ Śrī-śrīmad-Ujjvalanīlamaṇiḥ (ed. Purīdāsa). Vrndavana: Haridāsa Śarman.Google Scholar
  27. Rūpa Kavirāja. 1949. Sārasaṅgrahaḥ (A Work on Gaudiya Vaisnavism) Attributed to Rūpa Kavirāja (ed. Krishnagopal Goswami Sastri). Calcutta: University of Calcutta.Google Scholar
  28. Sheth, Noel. 1981. “The Impeccable Krishna.” Indica 18, 1: 1–6.Google Scholar
  29. Sheth, Noel. 1984. The Divinity of Krishna. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Sheth, Noel. S. J. 1985. “Kṛṣṇa’s Stealing of the Herdsmaidens’ Clothes.” Annals of Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute 66, 1: 161–74.Google Scholar
  31. Sheth, Noel. 1986. “Transformation Through Denudation.” Indica 23, 1–2: 51–62.Google Scholar
  32. Sheth, Noel. 1989–90. “The Justification of Krishna’s Childhood Pranks.” Indologica Taurinensia 15–16: 325–52.Google Scholar
  33. Sheth, Noel. 1993. “The Good Thief: The Justification of Kṛṣṇa’s Acts of Stealing.” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens (Supplement) 36: 149–66.Google Scholar
  34. Sheth, Noel. 1998. “The Justification of Krishna’s Destruction of the Yadavas.” Purāṇa 40: 34–44.Google Scholar
  35. Viśvanātha Cakravartī. 1954. “Śrī-śrī-Ānandacandrikā.” In Rūpa Gosvāmī, Śrī-śrī-Rūpa-Gosvāmi-prabhupāda-praṇītaḥ Śrī-śrīmad-Ujjvalanīlamaṇiḥ (ed. Purīdāsa), 1–259. Vrndavana: Haridāsa Śarman.Google Scholar
  36. Viśvanātha Cakravartī. 1963 [Samvat 2020]. Svakīyātvanirāsavicāraḥ tathā Parakīyātvanirūpaṇam (ed. Kṛṣṇadāsa Bābā). Kusumasarobara: Gaurahari Press.Google Scholar
  37. Viśvanātha Cakravartī. 2007–8. Svakīyātvanirāsavicāraḥ tathā Parakīyātvanirūpaṇam (ed. Haridāsa Śāstrī). Vrndavana: Śrīgadādhara Gaurahari Press.Google Scholar
  38. Viśvanātha Kavirāja. 1923 [1910]. The Sāhityadarpaṇa of Viśvanātha (Parichchhedas I–X) with Notes on Parichchhedas I, II, X, and History of Alaṅkāra Literature by P. V. Kane. Bombay.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sophia UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations