International Journal of Hindu Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 287–312 | Cite as

The Vedamūrti: Embodying the Veda in Contemporary Maharashtra

  • Borayin LariosEmail author


Authoritative Text Vedic Ritual Vedic Text Discursive Frame Sacred Fire 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Cited

  1. Atharvaveda. 1895–98. The Śaunakīya Recension of the Atharvaveda with Sāyaṇa’s Commentary (ed. S. P. Pandit). Bombay: Government Central Book Depot.Google Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power (trans. Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1995 [1972]. Outline of a Theory of Practice (trans. Richard Nice). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brereton, Joel P. 2004. “Bráhman, Brahmán, and Sacrificer.” In Arlo Griffiths and Jan E. M. Houben, eds., The Vedas: Texts, Language Ritual. Proceedings of the Third International Vedic Workshop, Leiden 2002, 325–44. Groningen: Egbert Forsten.Google Scholar
  5. Bruck, Gabriele vom and Barbara Bodenhorn, eds. 2006. The Anthropology of Names and Naming. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cenkner, William. 1983. A Tradition of Teachers: Śaṅkara and the Jagadgurus Today. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  7. Datta, Amaresh, ed. 1987. Encyclopaedia of Indian Literature. Volume 1: A–Devo. Delhi: Sahitya Akademi.Google Scholar
  8. Deshpande, Madhav M. 1990. “Changing Conceptions of the Veda: From Speech-Acts to Magical ‘Sounds.’ ” Adyar Library Bulletin 54: 1–41.Google Scholar
  9. Deshpande, Madhav M. 2010. “Kṣatriyas in the Kali Age? Gāgābhatta and His Opponents.” Indo-Iranian Journal 53, 2: 95–120.Google Scholar
  10. Deshpande, Madhav M. 2012. “Vedas and their Śākhās: Contested Relationships.” In François Voegeling, Vincent Eltschinger, Danielle Feller, Maria Piera Candotti, Bogdan Diaconescu, and Malhar Kulkarni, eds., Devadattīyam: Johannes Bronkhorst Felicitation Volume, 341–62. Bern: Peter LangGoogle Scholar
  11. Doniger, Wendy and Brian K. Smith, trans. 1991. The Laws of Manu. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  12. Fischer-Tiné, Harald and Michael Mann. 2004. Colonialism as Civilizing Mission: Cultural Ideology in British India. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fujii, Masato. 2001. “The Brahman Priest in the History of Vedic Texts”. Studia Orientalia 94: 147–60.Google Scholar
  14. Fuller, Chris and John Harriss. 2005. “Globalizing Hinduism: A ‘Traditional’ Guru and Modern Businessmen in Chennai.” In Chris Fuller and Jackie Assyag, eds., Globalizing India: Perspectives From Below, 211–36. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gillespie, Alex. 2006. Becoming Other: From Social Interaction to Self-Reflection. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Gonda, Jan. 1950. Notes on Brahman. Utrecht: Beyers.Google Scholar
  17. Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hacking, Ian. 2001. An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hilgert, Markus. 2010. “,Text-Anthropologie‘: Die Erforschung von Materialität und Präsenz des Geschriebenen als hermeneutische Strategie.” Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orientgesellschaft 142: 85–124.Google Scholar
  20. Howarth, Caroline. 2002. “Identity in Whose Eyes? The Role of Representations in Identity Construction.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 32, 2: 145–62.Google Scholar
  21. Inden, Ronald B. 1990. Imagining India. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Jayaraman, Raja. 2005. “Personal Identity in a Globalized World: Cultural Roots of Hindu Personal Names and Surnames.” The Journal of Popular Culture 38, 3: 476–90.Google Scholar
  23. King, Richard. 2002 [1999]. Orientalism and Religion: Postcolonial Theory, India and “the Mystic East.” London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Kūrmapurāṇa. 1971. Kūrmapurāṇa; Sanskrit Text with English Translation (ed. A. S. Gupta). Varanasi: All-India Kashiraj Trust.Google Scholar
  25. Larios, Borayin. Forthcoming. “Trends of Standardization and Institutionalization in the Transmission of the Vedas: Examples from Contemporary Maharashtra” In Jan E. M. Houben, Julieta Rotaru, and Michael Witzel, eds., Vedic Śākhās: Past, Present, Future. Proceedings of the Fifth International Vedic Workshop, Bucharest 2011. Bucharest: Biblioteca Bucureştilor.Google Scholar
  26. Lubin, Timothy. 1994. “Consecration and Ascetical Regimen: A History of Hindu Vrata, Dīkṣā, Upanayana, and Brahmacarya.” Ph.D. Dissertation. Columbia: Columbia University Library.Google Scholar
  27. Malamoud, Charles. 1977. Le svādhyāya, récitation personnelle du Veda: Taittirīya-Āraṇyaka. Paris: Institut de civilisation indienne.Google Scholar
  28. Novetzke, Christian Lee. 2011. “The Brahmin Double: The Brahmanical Construction of Anti-Brahminism and Anti-Caste Sentiment in the Religious Cultures of Precolonial Maharashtra.” South Asian History and Culture 2, 2: 232–52.Google Scholar
  29. O’Hanlon, Rosalind. 2010. “Letters Home: Banaras Pandits and the Maratha Regions in Early Modern India.” Modern Asian Studies 44, 2: 201–40.Google Scholar
  30. O’Hanlon, Rosalind. 2011. “Speaking from Siva’s temple: Banaras Scholar Households and the Brahman ‘Ecumene’ of Mughal India.” South Asian History and Culture 2, 2: 253–77.Google Scholar
  31. Olivelle, Patrick. 1993. The Āçrama System: The History and Hermeneutics of a Religious Institution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Olivelle, Patrick. 2008. “Orality, Memory, and Power: Vedic Scriptures and Brahmanical Hegemony in India.” In Vincent L. Wimbush, ed., Theorizing Scriptures: New Critical Orientations to a Cultural Phenomenon, 214–19. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Olivelle, Patrick, trans. 2004. The Law Code of Manu. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Parry, Jonathan P. 1985. “The Brahmanical Tradition and the Technology of the Intellect.” In Joanna Overing, ed., Reason and Morality, 200–225. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  35. Phadke, Y. D. 1985 [1975]. Social Reformers of Maharashtra. Delhi: Maharashtra Information Centre.Google Scholar
  36. Said, Edward W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  37. Scharfe, Harmut. 2002. Education in Ancient India. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  38. Thapar, Romila. 1985. “Syndicated Hinduism.” Seminar 313: 14–22.Google Scholar
  39. Thapar, Romila. 1989. “Imagined Religious Communities? Ancient History and the Modern Search for a Hindu Identity.” Modern Asian Studies 23, 2: 209–31.Google Scholar
  40. Thieme, Paul. 1952. “Bráhman.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 102: 91–129.Google Scholar
  41. van der Veer, Peter. 1991 [1989]. “The Concept of the Ideal Brahman as an Indological Construct.” In Günther-Dietz Sontheimer and Hermann Kulke, eds., Hinduism Reconsidered, 67–80. Delhi: Manohar.Google Scholar
  42. Wagle, N. K. 1987. “Ritual and Change in Early Nineteenth Century Society in Maharashtra: Vedokta Disputes in Baroda, Pune and Satara, 1824–1838.” In Milton Israel and N. K. Wagle, eds., Religion and Society in Maharashtra, 145–77. Toronto: Centre for South Asian Studies, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  43. Wimbush, Vincent L., ed. 2008. Theorizing Scriptures: New Critical Orientations to a Cultural Phenomenon. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Witzel, Michael. 1976. “On the History and the Present State of Vedic Tradition in Nepal.” Vasudha 15, 2: 17–24, 35–39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations