Ekalavya and Mahābhārata 1.121–28

  • Simon BrodbeckEmail author
Original Paper


Ekalavya Mahābhārata Subaltern Ring-composition Promises Archery Poona edition 


  1. Aktor M. (2000). Untouchables, women, and territories: Rituals of lordship in the Praāśara Smṛti. In: Leslie J., McGee M. (Eds), Invented identities: The interplay of gender, religion, and politics in India. New Delhi, Oxford University Press, pp. 133-156Google Scholar
  2. Ali D. (2004). Courtly culture and political life in early medieval India. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen N.J. (1998). The Indo-European prehistory of yoga. International Journal of Hindu Studies, 2(1):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen N.J. (1999). Arjuna and the second function: A Dumézilian crux. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (Series 3), 9(3):403–418Google Scholar
  5. Bhattacharya N.N. (1969). The Kurukṣetra war and the Pāṇḍavas. In: Sircar D.C. (eds) The Bhārata War and Purāṇic Genealogies. Calcutta, University of Calcutta, pp. 37-41Google Scholar
  6. Biardeau M. (1981). The salvation of the king in the Mahābhārata. Contributions to Indian Sociology (ns), 15(1):75–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Black, B. n.d. (In Press). The character of the self in ancient India: Priests, kings and women in the early Upaniṣads. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bodewitz H.W. (1996). pañcāgnividyā and the pitṛyāna/devayāna. In: Goswami A.K., Chutia D. (eds) Studies on Indology: Professor Mukunda Madhava Sharma felicitation volume. Delhi, Sri Satguru Publications, pp. 51-57Google Scholar
  9. Bowlby P. (1991). Kings without authority: The obligation of the ruler to gamble in the Mahābhārata. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses, 20(1):3–17Google Scholar
  10. Brereton J.P. (1997). “Why is a sleeping dog like the Vedic sacrifice?”: The structure of an Upaniṣadic brahmodya. In: Witzel M. (eds) Inside the texts, beyond the texts: New approaches to the study of the Vedas. Cambridge, Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, Harvard University, pp. 1-14Google Scholar
  11. Brereton J.P. (1999). Edifying puzzlement: Ṛgveda 10.129 and the uses of enigma. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 119(2):248–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brockington J.L. (1995). Concepts of race in the Mahābhārata and Rāmāyaṇa. In: Robb P. (eds) The concept of race in South Asia. Delhi, Oxford University Press, pp. 97-108Google Scholar
  13. Brockington J.L. (1998). The Sanskrit epics. Leiden, E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
  14. Brockington, J. L. (2003). Yoga in the Mahābhārata. In: Whicher I., Carpenter D. (eds) Yoga: The Indian tradition. London, RoutledgeCurzon, pp. 13-24Google Scholar
  15. Brodbeck S. (2004). The story of Ekalavya in the Mahābhārata. In: Leslie J., Clark M. (eds) Creating a dialogue: Text, belief and personal identity. London, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, pp. 15-24Google Scholar
  16. Brown W.N. (1972). Duty as truth in ancient India. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 116(3):252–268Google Scholar
  17. van Buitenen J.A.B. (Ed. and trans.) (1973). The Mahābhārata, vol. 1: 1. The book of the beginning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. van Buitenen J.A.B. (Ed. and trans.) (1978). The Mahābhārata, vol. 3: 4. The book of Virāṭa; 5. The book of the effort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. van Buitenen J.A.B. (Ed. and trans.) (1981). The Bhagavadgītā in the Mahābhārata: A bilingual edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Debroy D. (1986). Divyāstras of the Kurukṣetra War. Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 67, 1-15Google Scholar
  21. Doniger W. (1998). Rings of rejection and recognition in ancient India. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 26(5): 435-453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Douglas M. (1993). In the wilderness: The doctrine of defilement in the book of numbers. Sheffield, Sheffield Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Douglas M. (2002). Ring composition, ancient and modern. The F. D. Maurice Lectures, Department of Theology and Religious Studies, King’s College, London, March 5-7.Google Scholar
  24. Dundas P. (2002 [1992]). The Jains. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Epstein A.G. (1994). Miscarriages and miraculous births in Indo-European tradition. Journal of Indo-European Studies, 22(1-2): 151-163Google Scholar
  26. Fitzgerald J.L. (2001). Making Yudhiṣṭhira the king: The dialectics and the politics of violence in the Mahābhārata. Rocznik Orientalistyczny, 54(1): 63-92Google Scholar
  27. Fitzgerald J.L. (2002a). The Rāma Jāmadagnya ”thread” of the Mahābhārata: A new survey of Rāma Jāmadagnya in the Pune text. In M. Brockington (Ed.), Stages and transitions: Temporal and historical frameworks in epic and purāṇic literature (pp. 89-132). Zagreb: Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts.Google Scholar
  28. Fitzgerald J.L. (2002b). Nun befuddles king, shows karmayoga does not work: Sulabhā’s refutation of King Janaka at MBh 12.308. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 30(6), 641-677Google Scholar
  29. Fitzgerald J.L. (Ed. and trans.) (2004). The Mahābhārata, vol. 7: 11. The book of the women; 12. The book of peace, part 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ganguli K.M. (Trans. [and Pratap Chandra Roy, publisher]) (2000 [1884-96]). The Mahābhārata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa: Translated into English prose from the original Sanskrit text. 4 vols. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.Google Scholar
  31. Goldman R.P. (1972). Akṛtavraṇa vs. Śrikṛṣṇa as narrators of the legend of the BhārgavaRāma à propos some observations of Dr. V. S. Sukthankar. Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 53, 161-173Google Scholar
  32. Goldman R.P. (1977). Gods, priests, and warriors: The Bhṛgus of the Mahābhārata. New York, Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
  33. Hara M. (1975). Indra and tapas. Adyar Library Bulletin, 39, 129-160Google Scholar
  34. Hegarty J.M. (2001). An apprenticeship in attentiveness: Narrative patterning in the Dyūtaparvan and the Nalopākhyāna of the Mahābhārata. Rocznik Orientalistyczny, 54(1): 33-62Google Scholar
  35. Hegarty J.M. (2004). A fire of tongues: Narrative patterning in the Sanskrit Mahābhārata. PhD dissertation. Manchester: University of Manchester Library.Google Scholar
  36. Hiltebeitel A. (1976). The ritual of battle: Krishna in the Mahābhārata. Ithaca, Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
  37. Hiltebeitel A. (1977). Nahus:a in the skies: A human king of heaven. History of Religions, 16(4): 329-350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hiltebeitel A. (2000). Review of John L. Brockington’s The Sanskrit epics. Indo-Iranian Journal, 43(2): 161-169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hiltebeitel A. (2001). Rethinking the Mahābhārata: A reader’s guide to the education of the dharma king. Chicago, University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  40. Hiltebeitel A. (2002). Allusion and explication in the Gītā’s epic world. Journal of Vaiṩṇava Studies, 11(1): 131-139Google Scholar
  41. Hiltebeitel A. (2004). Role, role model, and function: The Sanskrit epic warrior in comparison and theory. In: Hirst J.S., Thomas L. (Eds), Playing for real: Hindu role models, religion, and gender. New Delhi, Oxford University Press, pp. 27-50Google Scholar
  42. Hintze A. (2002). On the literary structure of the older Avesta. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 65(1): 31-51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hock H.H. (2002). The Yājñavalkya cycle in the Bṛhad Āraṇyaka Upaniṣad. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 122(2): 278-286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hopkins E.W. (1901). Yoga-technique in the great epic. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 22, 333-379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hudson D.D. (2001). The ”barley-corn” pattern of Bhagavad-Gītā 12-16 Journal of Vaisnava Studies, 9(2): 181-194Google Scholar
  46. Irwin J.C. (1982). The sacred anthill and the cult of the primordial mound. History of Religions, 21(4): 339-360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jarow E.H.R. (1999). The letter of the law and the discourse of power: Karṇa and controversy in the Mahābhārata. Journal of Vaiṣṇava Studies, 8(1): 59-76Google Scholar
  48. Jha V.N. (1970). Varṇasaṁkara in the dharma sūtras: theory and practice. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 13, 273-288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jha V.N. (1974). From tribe to untouchable: The case of Niṣādas. In: Sharma R.S., Jha V.N. (Eds), Indian society: Historical probings in memory of D. D. Kosambi. New Delhi, People’s Publishing House, pp. 67-84Google Scholar
  50. Jha V.N. (1975). Stages in the history of untouchables. Indian Historical Review, 2(1): 14-31Google Scholar
  51. Johnsen G. (1966). Varuṇa and Dhṛtarāṣṭra. Indo-Iranian Journal, 9(4): 245-265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Johnson W.J. (Trans. and ed.) (2001). Kālidāsa The recognition of Sakuntalā. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Katz R.C. (1991). The Sauptika episode in the structure of the Mahābhārata. In: Sharma A. (Ed), Essays on the Mahābhārata. Leiden, E. J. Brill, pp. 130-149Google Scholar
  54. Killingley D. (1997). The paths of the dead and the five fires. In: Connolly P., Hamilton S. (Eds), Indian insights: Buddhism, Brahmanism and bhakti. London, Luzac Oriental, pp. 1-20Google Scholar
  55. Kosambi D.D. (1946). The parvasaṑgraha of the Mahābhārata. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 66(2): 110-117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kosambi D.D. (1951). Parvasaṑgraha figures for the Bhīṣmaparvan of the Mahābhārata. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 71(1): 21-25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Leslie J. (2003). Authority and meaning in Indian religions: Hinduism and the case of Vālmīki. Aldershot, AshgateGoogle Scholar
  58. Malamoud C. (1996 [1989]). Cooking the world: Ritual and thought in ancient India (trans. David White). Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Mazumdar B.C. (1906). Mahābhārata (A diparva, ch. 94). Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 225-226Google Scholar
  60. McGrath K. (2004). The Sanskrit hero: Karṇa in epic Mahābhārata. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
  61. Mehendale M.A. (2001). Interpolations in the Mahābhārata. Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 82, 193-212Google Scholar
  62. Minkowski C.Z. (1989). Janamejaya’s sattra and ritual structure. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 109(3): 401-420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Monier-Williams M. (1990 [1899]). A Sanskrit-English dictionary. Etymologically and philologically arranged, with special reference to cognate Indo-European languages. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  64. More S. (1995). Kṛṣṇrsna The man and his mission. An enquiry into the rationale of inter-relationship between Krsna’s life, mission, and philosophy. Pune: Gaaj Prakashan.Google Scholar
  65. Morson G.S. (1994). Narrative and freedom: The shadows of time. New Haven, Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  66. Nath V. (2002). King Vena, Niṣāda and Pṛthu: A recurrent purāṇnic myth re-examined. Indian Historical Review, 29(1-2): 48-65Google Scholar
  67. Oertel H. (1907). Contributions from the Jāiminīya Brāhmaṇa to the history of the Brāhmaṇa literature. Sixth series: The story of Uśanas Kāvya, the three-headed Gandharvan, and Indra. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 28, 81-98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. O’Flaherty W.D. (1971). The submarine mare in the mythology of Śiva. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1(1): 9-27Google Scholar
  69. Parasher A. (1991). Mlecchas in early India: A study in attitudes towards outsiders up to AD 600. New Delhi, Munshiram ManoharlalGoogle Scholar
  70. Parks W. (1990). Verbal duelling in heroic narrative: The Homeric and old English traditions. Princeton, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  71. Piantelli M. (2002). King Janaka as a male chauvinist pig in the Mahābhārata. In: Monti A. (Ed), Hindu masculinities across the ages: Updating the past. Turin, L’Harmattan Italia, pp. 35-55Google Scholar
  72. Pollock S. (1996). The Sanskrit cosmopolis, 300-1300: Transculturation, vernacularization, and the question of ideology. In J. E. M. Houben (Ed.), Ideology and status of Sanskrit: Contributions to the history of the Sanskrit language (pp. 197-247). Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
  73. Ramanujan A.K. (1991a). Repetition in the Mahābhārata. In: Sharma A. (Ed), Essays on the Mahābhārata. Leiden, E. J. Brill, pp. 419-443Google Scholar
  74. Ramanujan A.K. (1991b). Three hundred Rāmāyaṇas: Five examples and three thoughts on translation. In: Richman P. (Eds), Many Rāmāyaṇas The diversity of a narrative tradition in South Asia. Berkeley, University of California Press, pp. 22-49Google Scholar
  75. Semeka-Pankratov E. (1979). A semiotic approach to the polysemy of the symbol nāga in Indian mythology. Semiotica, 27, 237-290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shakespeare W. (1936). Twelfth night; or, What you will. In: Kittredge G.L. (Eds), The complete works of Shakespeare. Boston, Ginn & Company, pp. 401-430Google Scholar
  77. Shankar S. (1994). The thumb of Ekalavya: Postcolonial studies and the ”Third World” scholar in a neocolonial world. World Literature Today, 68(3): 479-487Google Scholar
  78. Sharma R.S. (1980 [1958]). Śūdras in ancient India: A social history of the lower order down to circa AD 600. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  79. Sharma A. (2000). Of Śudras, Sātas and Ślokas: Why is the Mahābhārata preeminently in the anuṩṭubh metre?. Indo-Iranian Journal, 43(3): 225-278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Shulman D. (1978). The serpent and the sacrifice: An anthill myth from Tiruvārūr. History of Religions, 18(2): 107-137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. von Simson G. (1968). The mythic origin of Droṇa and Karṇa. Journal of the Bihar Research Society, 54, 40-44Google Scholar
  82. von Simson G. (1984). The mythic background of the Mahābhārata. Indologica Taurinensia, 12, 191-223Google Scholar
  83. von Simson G. (1989-1990). Remarks on the Suparṇa/Garuḍa myth (later Vedic period). Indologica Taurinensia, 15-16, 353-360Google Scholar
  84. von Simson G. (1999). Narrated time and its relation to the supposed year myth in the Mahābhārata. In: Brockington M., Schreiner P.(Eds), Composing a tradition: Concepts, techniques, and relationships. Zagreb, Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts, pp. 49-66Google Scholar
  85. Smith M.C. (1991). Epic parthenogenesis. In: Sharma A. (Eds). Essays on the Mahābhārata. Leiden, E. J. Brill, pp. 84-100Google Scholar
  86. Smith B.K. (1994). Classifying the universe: The ancient Indian varṇa system and the origins of caste. New York, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  87. Smith J.D. (Ed) (1999). The Mahābhārata (electronic text). Pune, Bhandarkar Oriental Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
  88. Smith F.M., Carri S.J. (1994). The identity and significance of the valmīkavapa in the Vedic ritual. Indo-Iranian Journal, 37(3): 201-231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sohnen R. (1979). Untersuchungen zur Komposition von Reden und Gesprächen im Rāmāyaṇa 2 vols. Reinbek, Dr Inge Wezler/Verlag für Orientalistische FachpublikationenGoogle Scholar
  90. Sohnen-Thieme R. (1995). On the concept and function of satya (”truth”) in ancient Indian literature. In C. Galewicz et al. (Eds.), International Conference on Sanskrit and Related Studies, September 23-26, 1993: Proceedings (pp. 235-244). Cracow: Enigma Press.Google Scholar
  91. Stanley K. (1993). The shield of Homer: Narrative structure in the Iliad. Princeton, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  92. Stein O. (1936). The numeral 18. The Poona Orientalist, 1(3): 1-37Google Scholar
  93. Stein O. (1937). Additional notes on the numeral 18. The Poona Orientalist, 2(3): 164-65Google Scholar
  94. von Stietencron H. (1997). The non-existence of impurity and the legitimation of kings. In: Lienhard S., Piovano I. (Eds), Lex et litterae: Studies in honour of Professor Oscar Botto. Turin, Edizioni dell’Orso, pp. 487-508Google Scholar
  95. Sukthankar V.S. (Ed) (1933). The Mahābhārata for the first time critically edited, vol 1: The Ādiparvan. Poona, Bhandarkar Oriental Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
  96. Sukthankar V.S., Belvalkar S.K., & Vaidya P.L. (general editors), and others (Eds.) (1933-1971). The Mahābhārata for the first time critically edited. 24 vols. (including Harivaṃśa). Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.Google Scholar
  97. Sutton N. (1999). An exposition of early Sāṁkhya, a rejection of the Bhagavad-Gītā and a critique of the role of women in Hindu society: The Sulabhā-Janaka-Saṁvāda. Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 80, 53-65Google Scholar
  98. Thomas L. (1998). Fathers as mothers: The myth of male parthenogenesis. In: Spaas L., Selous T. (Eds), Paternity and fatherhood: Myths and realities. Basingstoke, Macmillan, pp. 204-218Google Scholar
  99. Thompson G. (1998). On truth-acts in Vedic. Indo-Iranian Journal, 41(2): 125-153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Tieken H. (2004). The Mahābhārata after the great battle. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Sudasiens, 48, 5-46Google Scholar
  101. Tubb G.A. (2002). Numbers that matter. Journal of Vaiṣṇava Studies, 11(1): 147-152Google Scholar
  102. Vanita R. (2003). The self is not gendered: Sulabha’s debate with King Janaka. National Women’s Studies Association Journal, 15(2): 76-93Google Scholar
  103. Watkins C. (1995). How to kill a dragon: Aspects of Indo-European poetics. New York, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  104. Whitaker J.L. (2000). Divine weapons and tejas in the two Indian epics. Indo-Iranian Journal, 43(2): 87-113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Whitaker J.L. (2002). How the gods kill: The Nārāyaṇa astra episode, the death of Rāvaṇa, and the principles of tejas in the Indian epics. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 30(4): 403-430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. White D.G. (1989). Dogs die. History of Religions, 28(4): 283-303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. White D.G. (1996). The alchemical body: Siddha traditions in medieval India. Chicago, University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  108. Witzel M. (1987). On the origin of the literary device of the ”frame story” in old Indian literature. In: Falk H. (Ed), Hinduismus und Buddhismus: Festschrift fur Ulrich Schneider. Freiburg, Hedwig Falk, pp. 380-414Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of the Study of Religions, SOASUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations