Advertisement

Philosophia

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 1185–1196 | Cite as

What is Structural Injustice?

  • Christopher Ryan MabolocEmail author
Article
  • 210 Downloads

Abstract

This paper intends to explain the problem of structural injustice. The Rawlsian theory of justice is problematic due to the reality of positional differences. The assumptions of Rawls are put into question. Oppression, according to Iris Marion Young, is social in character. Fair opportunity is not enough. To elaborate this critique, this study presents the exclusion of individuals with handicap, the problem of global justice, and the situation of women in patriarchal cultures. Some social rules and the behavior of people discriminate the powerless. For instance, particular standards in society promote the high sense of respectability for professionals but not the respect for the equal dignity of persons. Procedures, laws, and policies manifest the prejudice against others. Beyond Rawls, the pursuit of justice and democratic inclusion, it is argued, requires overcoming unjust structures.

Keywords

Rawlsian theory Priority of liberty Structural injustice Positional difference Oppression 

References

  1. Abberley, P. (1987). The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. Disability, Handicap and Society, 2(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry, B. (1995). Justice as impartiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barry, B. (2001). Culture and equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, J. (2004). The importance of philosophy: reflections on John Rawls. South African Journal of Philosophy, 23, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collste, G. (2015). Global rectificatory justice. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Galston, W. (1980). Justice and the human good. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kittay, E. F. (1999). Love’s labor. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Kittay, E. F. (2001). When caring is just and justice is caring: justice and mental retardation. Public Culture, 13(3), 557–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kymlicka, W. (2007). Contemporary political philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Revised ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Reiman, J. (2012). The structure of structural injustice: thoughts on Iris Marion Young’s Responsibility for Justice. Social Theory and Practice, 38, 738–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schaefer, D. (1979). Justice or tyranny. New York: National University Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Young, I. M. (2005). Throwing like a girl. In On female bodily experience. Oxford: Oxford University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Young, I. M. (2007). Structural injustice and the politics of difference. In A. S. Laden & D. O. Cambridge (Eds.), Multiculturalism and political theory. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentAteneo de Davao UniversityDavao CityPhilippines

Personalised recommendations