Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Moods, Colored Lenses, and Emotional Disconnection: a Comment on Gallegos

  • 236 Accesses

Abstract

In “Moods Are Not Colored Lenses: Perceptualism and the Phenomenology of Moods” (2017) Francisco Gallegos presents a challenge to popular view about the phenomenology of being in a mood that he calls “perceptualism”. In this essay, I offer a partial defense of perceptualism about moods and argue that perceptualism and Gallegos’s preferred Heideggerian alternative need not be viewed as in opposition to one another.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, e.g.: (Fish 2005; Haugeland 1978; Kind 2014; Rusting 1998; Tye 2008)

  2. 2.

    I am grateful to the reviewer for this journal for this and many, many other valuable and challenging suggestions and comments that helped me a lot in getting clearer about my thinking on this topic.

  3. 3.

    It is important to note that the expectations need not take the form of fully articulate beliefs or some other cognitive states. If Siegel is right, the expectations are part of the content of perceptual experiences, but making that claim is not mandatory for the perceptualist, who, it seems to me, may locate the expectations anywhere within the perceptual-cognitive system, provided that reality’s failure to conform to them is reflected in the subject’s phenomenology.

  4. 4.

    It could be objected that it is strange for a mood experience to affect cognitive states and perceptual states differently. But this wouldn’t be a terribly uncommon occurrence. Suppose you thought that moods are causally associated with biochemical changes within an organism. It is well established empirically that biochemical changes could affect perceptual states differently than they affect cognitive states: one example comes from the changes caused by marijuana intoxication: it typically has profound acute effects on cognition (Crean et al. 2011), and mild to nonexistent effects on (visual) perception (Stapleton et al. 1986). The same could be true of moods; after all, mood effects on cognition seem more robust than mood effects on perception.

  5. 5.

    It might be held that Helm’s worries affect any perceptualist account of moods. To the extent that this is correct, I have to admit that trying to answer Helm’s objection goes beyond the aims of this paper; rather, my aim is to see how perceptualism can deal with Gallegos’s objection.

  6. 6.

    The reviewer for this journal points out that this type of account might, in fact, be more congenial to Gallegos than it is to the perceptualist, depending on how one interprets the notion of a mode of presentation (or, at any rate, a Fregean could stay neutral between the two accounts). The reason for this is that a Fregean need not commit herself to the modes of presentation being features of perceptual awareness rather than other kinds of awareness. I agree; while expanding on the Fregean view of moods is beyond the aims of this paper, I will state, without argument, that it strikes me as the most promising one to develop perceptualism in light of Gallegos’s critique.

References

  1. Bayne, T. (2009). Perception and the reach of phenomenal content. Philosophical Quarterly, 59(236), 385–404.

  2. Brady, M. S. (2007). Recalcitrant emotions and visual illusions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 44(3), 273–284.

  3. Brogaard, B. (2013). Do we perceive natural kind properties? Philosophical Studies, 162(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9985-5.

  4. Crean, R. D., Crane, N. A., & Mason, B. J. (2011). An Evidence Based Review of Acute and Long-Term Effects of Cannabis Use on Executive Cognitive Functions. Journal of addiction medicine, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0b013e31820c23fa.

  5. Fish, W. (2005). Emotions, moods, and intentionality. In G. Forrai & G. Kampis (Eds.), Intentionality: Past and future (pp. 25–36). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

  6. Gallegos, F. (2017). Moods Are Not Colored Lenses: Perceptualism and the Phenomenology of Moods. Philosophia, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-017-9820-5.

  7. Haugeland, J. (1978). The nature and plausibility of cognitivism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(2), 215–226.

  8. Helm, B. (2001). Emotional reason: deliberation, motivation, and the nature of value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  9. Kind, A. (2014). The case against representationalism about moods. In U. Kriegel (Ed.), Current controversies in philosophy of mind (pp. 113–134). New York: Routledge.

  10. Rusting, C. L. (1998). Personality, mood, and cognitive processing of emotional information: Three conceptual frameworks. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 165–196.

  11. Siegel, S. (2006). Subject and object in the contents of visual experience. Philosophical Review, 115, 355–388.

  12. Siegel, S. (2011). The contents of visual experience: Oxford University Press.

  13. Siegel, S. (2016). The Contents of Perception. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 ed.).

  14. Stapleton, J. M., Guthrie, S., & Linnoila, M. (1986). Effects of alcohol and other psychotropic drugs on eye movements: relevance to traffic safety. Journal of studies on alcohol, 47(5), 426–432.

  15. Tye, M. (2008). The experience of emotion: An intentionalist theory. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 25–50.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Bartek Chomanski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chomanski, B. Moods, Colored Lenses, and Emotional Disconnection: a Comment on Gallegos. Philosophia 46, 625–632 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-017-9917-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Moods
  • Affective phenomenology
  • Evaluative perception