Uncertainty in Hiring Does Not Justify Affirmative Action
Luc Bovens has recently advanced a novel argument for affirmative action, grounded in the plausible idea that it is hard for an employer to evaluate the qualifications of candidates from underrepresented groups. Bovens claims that this provides a profit-maximizing employer with reason to shortlist prima facie less-qualified candidates from underrepresented groups. In this paper, I illuminate three flaws in Bovens’s argument. First, it suffers from model error: A rational employer does not incur costs to scrutinize candidates when it knows their qualifications with perfect certainty, nor does it refuse to hire better-qualified candidates just because they did not require extra scrutiny. Second, Bovens’s core premise--that there is greater variance in the evaluation of underrepresented candidates than there is the evaluation of other candidates--hurts underrepresented candidates rather than helps them. Third, candidates who are not shortlisted for the reasons Bovens gives have a plausible complaint about unfairness in the hiring process.
KeywordsAffirmative action Statistical discrimination Hiring Distributive justice Meritocracy
- Arrow, K. J. (1973). The theory of discrimination. In O. Ashenfelter & A. Rees (Eds.), Discrimination in Labor Markets (pp. 3–33). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Becker, G. (1957). The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Clauset, A., Arbesman, S., & Larremore, D. B. (2015). Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks. Science Advances, 1.Google Scholar
- Connolly, M. R., Lee, Y.-G., and Savoy, J. N. 2015. Faculty hiring and tenure by sex and race: new evidence from a national survey. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 16-20 April 2015.Google Scholar
- Dicey Jennings, C., Kyrilov, A., Cobb, P., Vlasits, J., Vinson, D. W., Montes, E., & Franco, C. (2015). Academic placement data and analysis: 2015 final report. At https://www.dropbox.com/s/b9p0dx817qkcb3e/APDAFinalReport2015.pdf?dl=0.
- Forscher, P. S., Lai, C. K., Axt, J. R., Ebersole, C. R., Herman, M., Devine, P. G., Nosek, B. A. (2017). A meta-analysis of change in implicit bias. https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/dv8tu/. Accessed 22 July 2017.
- Marinoff, L. 2009. Inside a search. Inside Higher Ed, <https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2009/08/31/marinoff>, retrieved 3 July 2017.
- McGinnis, R., & Long, J. S. (1997). Entry into academia: Effects of stratification, geography and ecology. In M. J. Finkelstein & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), The Academic Profession: The Professorate in Crisis (pp. 342–366). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Mulligan, T. (2017). Justice and the Meritocratic State. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Narveson, J. (1993). Moral Matters. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
- Oprisko, R. L., Dobbs, K. L., and DiGrazia, J. 2013. Honor, prestige, and the academy: A portrait of political science tenured and tenure-track faculty in Ph.D.-granting institutions (2012-2013). Paper presented at the 2013 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
- Phelps, E. S. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. American Economic Review, 62, 659–661.Google Scholar