Philosophia

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 1367–1374 | Cite as

On Smilansky’s Defense of Prepunishment: A Response to Robinson

Article
  • 313 Downloads

Abstract

In a 2010 paper published in this journal, Robinson responded to Smilansky’s argument that compatibilists do not have a principled reason to reject prepunishment. Smilansky argues that, due to the nature of a compatibilist universe, offenders will actually carry out their intended offences and are rightfully held responsible for them. As a result, there is no moral demand to wait for the offence to occur before punishing the offender. Smilansky has responded to a number of objections, but has not addressed Robinson’s arguments. This paper will defend Smilansky’s position against Robinson’s claims and conclude that Smilansky’s position remains undefeated.

Keywords

Punishment Prepunishment Compatibilism Determinism Responsibility 

References

  1. Beebee, H. (2008). Smilansky's alleged refutation of compatibilism. Analysis, 68, 258–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kearns, S. (2008). Compatibilism can resist prepunishment: a reply to Smilansky. Analysis, 68, 250–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. New, C. (1992). Time and punishment. Analysis, 52, 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. New, C. (1995). Punishing times: reply to Smilansky. Analysis, 55, 60–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Robinson, M. (2010). A compatibilist-friendly rejection of prepunishment. Philosophia, 38, 589–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Smilansky, S. (1994). The time to punish. Analysis, 54, 50–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Smilansky, S. (2007). Determinism and prepunishment: the radical nature of compatibilism. Analysis, 67, 347–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Smilansky, S. (2008a). More prepunishment for compatibilists: a reply to Beebee. Analysis, 68, 260–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Smilansky, S. (2008b). Prepunishment for compatibilists: a reply to Kearns. Analysis, 68, 254–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations