The Methodology of Philosophical Practice: Eclecticism and/or Integrativeness?
- 449 Downloads
The need for philosophical practice to integrate various methods, both conceptual and those based on the use of emotions, raises the question as to whether its methodology is necessarily eclectic, in terms of the collection of various methodologies used in philosophy, or whether there is a way to move beyond eclecticism. This is the main subject of this paper. In other words, the question is whether there is such a thing as an ‘integrative’ methodology and, if so, what distinguishes such a method from mere eclecticism. In this text, we define the methodological procedure of integrativeness as the process of systematizing perspectives into an orientational answer to the demands of a specific problem. What differentiates such an approach from mere summation is a new contribution that results from a synergistic and systematic meeting of positions and argumentations whose final result differs from its initial elements. Diversity in the form of a multidimensional relationship towards life and the world results in numerous perspectives, which is a value that should be cultivated and integrated into a reflective and actional perception of the world.
KeywordsPhilosophical practice Methodology Eclecticism Pluri-perspectivism Integrativeness
A part of this research was supported under Marie Curie Newfelpro funding scheme (CONVINce-ME project, FP7-PEOPLE-2011-COFUND program; Government of the Republic of Croatia and the Ministry of Science, Education and Sport). The project was hosted by the Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum. The research for the article also arises from Project no. 179049 (“Policies of Remembrance and National Identity: The Regional and European Context”) funded by the Serbian Ministry of Education and Research, which is implemented by the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade, 2010–2015.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Agamben, G. (2013). Opus Dei: an archaeology of duty. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Alexander, S. (1962). ‘They decide who lives, who dies. Medical miracle puts moral burden on small committee. Life (9 November 1962).Google Scholar
- Čović, A. (2006). Pluralizam i pluriperspektivizam. Filozofska istraživanja, 26(1), 7–12.Google Scholar
- Crowder, G. (2003). Pluralism, relativism and liberalism in Isaiah Berlin. Referred paper. Resourced document. http://berlin.wolf.ox.ac.uk/lists/onib/crowder/IBVPREL2003.pdf. Accessed 14 October 2014.
- DeWitt, R. (2010). Worldviews. An introduction to the history and philosophy of science. Second edition. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Fatić, A. (2015). Tasks for dreaming. The somatic cognition of emotions in moral judgment. In M. N. Weiss (Ed.), The socratic handbook (pp. 67–82). Wienna: Lit Publishers.Google Scholar
- Fatić, A. (2016). Virtue as identity: emotions and the moral personality. London: Rowman and Littlefield International.Google Scholar
- Fatić, A. (2013b). Epicurean ethics as a foundation for philosophical counselling. Philosophical Practice, 8(1), 1127–1141.Google Scholar
- Feary, V. (2003). Virtue-based feminist philosophical counselling. Practical Philosophy, 6(1), 7–26.Google Scholar
- Feary, V. (2004). Spirituality and philosophical practice: counseling with clients in crisis. Philosophical Practice, 9(3), 1413–1425.Google Scholar
- Ferraiolo, W. (2010). The IDEA method: stoic counsel. Philosophical Practice, 5(2), 627–633.Google Scholar
- Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
- Hadot, P. (1995). Philosophy as a way of life. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Heidegger, M. (1982). The basic problems of phenomenology (Albert Hofstadter (trans.). Revised edition). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Jay, M. (1988). Scopic regimes of modernity. In H. Foster (Ed.), Vision and visuality (p. 3323). New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
- Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment. Paul Guyer (ed. and trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1017/CBO9780511804656.
- Kolepman, L. M. (2013). The growth of bioethics as a second-order discipline. In J. R. Garrett, F. Jotterand, & C. D. Ralston (Eds.), The development of bioethics in the united states (pp. 137–158). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Lahav, R. (2001). Philosophical Counselling as a Quest for Wisdom. Practical Philosophy, March Issue. Resource document. http://www.society-for-philosophy-in-practice.org/journal/pdf/4-1%2006%20Lahav%20-%20Quest%20for%20Wisdom.pdf. Accessed 28 December 2014.
- Lewis, T., Amini, F., & Lannon, R. (2000). A general theory of love. London: Random House.Google Scholar
- Luhmann, N. (1987). Soziale systeme: grundriβ einer allgemeinen theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
- Mills, J. (2001). Philosophical counselling as psychotherapy: an eclectic approach. International Journal of Philosophical Practice, 1(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
- Mittelstraß, J. (1982). Wissenschaft als Lebensform. Reden über philosophische Orientierungen in Wissenschaft und Univeristät. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
- Nietzsche, F. (2006). On the genealogy of morality. In A.-P. Keith (Ed.), Carol Deithe (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Österman, B. (2014). Neo-socratic dialogus as a paradigmatic setting for philosophizing. Philosophical Practice, 9(3), 1426–1435.Google Scholar
- Repko, A. F. (2007). Integrating interdisciplinarity: How the theories of common ground and cognitive interdisciplinarity are informing the debate on interdisciplinary integration. Issues in Integrative Studies, 25, 1–31.Google Scholar
- Rukavina, K. (2010). “Okulocentrizam” ili privilegiranje vida u zapadnoj kulturi. Filozofska istraživanja, 32(3–4), 539–556.Google Scholar
- Solomon, X. (1999). A better way to think about business: how personal integrity leads to corporate success. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Yalom, I., & Leszcz, M. (2005). Theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar