Advertisement

Philosophia

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 349–359 | Cite as

Is the Appeal of the Doctrine of Double Effect Illusory?

  • Danny MarreroEmail author
Article

Abstract

Scanlon (2008) has argued that his theory of permissibility (STP) has more explanatory power than the Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE). I believe this claim is wrong. Borrowing Michael Walzer’s method of inquiry, I will evaluate the explanatory virtue of these accounts by their understanding of actual moral intuitions originated in historical cases. Practically, I will evaluate these accounts as they explain cases of hostage crises. The main question in this context is: is it permissible that nation-states act with military force in order to liberate hostages, even if those actions put the lives of the hostages at risk? The first part of this paper has an operative reconstruction of the relevant theories. In the second section, two cases of hostage crises will be considered: the Moscow theater hostage crisis of 2002, and the Jaque Operation, which occurred in Colombia in 2008. Additionally, it will be shown that DDE explains these cases better than STP. Finally, this paper offers a critical analysis of Scanlon’s account of the explanatory power of both STP and DDE.

Keywords

Double Effect Permissibility Philosophy of War Hostage Crises Thomas Scanlon 

References

  1. Bratman, M. (1987). Intentions, plans and practical reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Burban, L., Gubareva, S., Karpova, T., Karpov, N., Kurbatov, V., Milovidov, D., et al. (2006, April 26). Nord-Ost. Investigation unfinished. Events, facts and conclusions. Report on the Crisis and Legal Proceedings. Retrieved form http://www.pravdabeslana.ru/nordost/dokleng.htm
  3. Colombian Soldier Wore Red Cross Logo in Hostage Rescue (2008, July 17). New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/17/world/americas/17colombia.html.
  4. Gas ‘Killed Moscow Hostages’ (2002, October 27). BBC News. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2365383.stm.
  5. Global Humanitaria (2013). Únete al Ciclo que Cambia Vidas. Retrieved from http://www.globalhumanitaria.org/index.php.
  6. Helicopter used to Trick the FARC Guerillas in Operation Jaque Side (2008). Retrieved from http://operationjaque.com/picture/helicopter-used-trick-farc-guerillas-operation-jaque-side.
  7. International Committee of the Red Cross (1949). First Geneva Convention. For the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field. Retrieved from http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/full/365?opendocument.
  8. Jimenez, C. (2008, Jun 16). ONG ficticia con la que se engañó a Farc usó registros de una organización verdadera. Semana.com. Retrieved from http://www.semana.com/on-line/ong-ficticia-engano-farc-uso-registros-organizacion-verdadera/113631-3.aspx.
  9. McGeary, J. & Quinn-Judge, P. (2002, October 29). Theater of war. Time. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,384761,00.html.
  10. Moscow Hostage Death Toll Soar (2002, October 26) BBC News. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2364141.stm.
  11. Padgett, T. (2008, July 2). Colombian’s stunning hostage rescue. Time. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1819862,00.html.
  12. Penhaul, K. (2008, July 25). Colombian military used red cross emblem in rescue. CNN. Retrieved from http://articles.cnn.com/2008-07-15/world/colombia.red.cross_1_red-cross-emblem-farc-rebels-military-contractors?_s=PM:WORLD.
  13. Peterson, S. (2002, October 29). Gas enters counterterror arsenal. The unprecedented use of a secret toxic gas leaves 400 still hospitalized, and starts a debate about Russian tactics. The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved from http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1029/p01s03-woeu.html.
  14. Quinn, W. (1989). Actions, intentions, and consequences: the doctrine of double effect. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 18(4), 213–245.Google Scholar
  15. Rights Group Demands Siege Inquiry (2002, October 27). BBC News. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2365525.stm.
  16. Scanlon, T. (2008). Moral dimensions. permissibility, meaning, blame. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Walzer, M. (2004a). After 9/11: Five questions about terrorism. Arguing about war (pp. 130–142). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Walzer, M. (2004b). Terrorism: A critique of excuses. Arguing about war (pp. 51–66). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Walzer, M. (1977). Just and unjust wars: A moral argument with historical examples. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of HumanitiesUniversidad Jorge Tadeo LozanoBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations