Philosophia

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 763–786 | Cite as

Coverage-Reliability, Epistemic Dependence, and the Problem of Rumor-Based Belief

Article

Abstract

Rumors, for better or worse, are an important element of public discourse. The present paper focuses on rumors as an epistemic phenomenon rather than as a social or political problem. In particular, it investigates the relation between the mode of transmission and the reliability, if any, of rumors as a source of knowledge. It does so by comparing rumor with two forms of epistemic dependence that have recently received attention in the philosophical literature: our dependence on the testimony of others, and our dependence on what has been called the ‘coverage-reliability’ of our social environment (Goldberg 2010). According to the latter, an environment is ‘coverage-reliable’ if, across a wide range of beliefs and given certain conditions, it supports the following conditional: If ~p were true I would have heard about it by now. However, in information-deprived social environments with little coverage-reliability, rumors may transmit information that could not otherwise be had. This suggests that a trade-off exists between levels of trust in the coverage-reliability of official sources and (warranted) trust in rumor as a source of information.

Keywords

Social epistemology Rumor Rumour Coverage Epistemic dependence 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Early versions of this paper were presented at a meeting of the Epistemology Research Group, University of Edinburgh, and at the 2nd Copenhagen-Lund Workshop in Social Epistemology, University of Lund, in 2011. A revised version was given at the “Interdisciplinary Workshop on Influence and Persuasion in the Formation and Sustainment of Social-Fringe Groups”, held in Kuching, Sarawak (Malaysia), in 2012. I am grateful to the audiences at all three occasions for stimulating discussions, and to the United States Air Force for funding my invitation to the Kuching workshop.

References

  1. Adkins, K. C. (2002). The real dirt: gossip and feminist epistemology. Social Epistemology, 16(3), 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W., & Postman, L. (1947). The psychology of rumour. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
  3. Anscombe, E. (1973). Hume and Julius Caesar. Analysis, 34(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, D. (1956). Work and its discontents. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  5. Ben-Ze’ev, A. (1994). The vindication of gossip. In R. F. Goodman & A. Ben-Ze’ev (Eds.), Good gossip (pp. 11–24). Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bergmann, J. R. (1993). Discreet indiscretions: The social organization of gossip. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  7. Bordia, P. (1996). Studying verbal interaction on the internet: the case of rumor transmission research. Behavior Research Methods, 28(2), 149–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buckner, H. T. (1969). A theory of rumor transmission. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29(1), 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burge, T. (1986). Individualism and psychology. Philosophical Review, 95(1), 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caplow, T. (1947). Rumors in war. Social Forces, 25(3), 298–302.Google Scholar
  11. Chakrabarti, A. (1992). On knowing by being told. Philosophy East and West, 42(3), 421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coady, C. A. J. (2006a). Pathologies of testimony. In J. Lackey & E. Sosa (Eds.), The epistemology of testimony (pp. 253–271). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coady, D. (2006b). Rumour has it. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 20(1), 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Code, L. (1995). Gossip, or in praise of chaos. In L. Code (Ed.), Rhetorical spaces: Essays on gendered locations (pp. 144–153). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Davidson, D. (1984). The method of truth in metaphysics. In D. Davidson (Ed.), Inquiries into truth and interpretation (pp. 199–214). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. de Montaigne, M. (1958). The complete essays (trans: Frame, D. M.). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. DiFonzo, N. (2010). Ferreting facts or fashioning fallacies? Factors in rumor accuracy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(11), 1124–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DiFonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2002). Corporate rumor activity, belief and accuracy. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DiFonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2006). Rumor in organizational contexts. In A. D. Hantula (Ed.), Advances in social & organizational psychology: A tribute to Ralph Rosnow (pp. 249–274). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Eder, D., & Enke, J. L. (1991). The structure of gossip: opportunities and constraints on collective expression among adolescents. American Sociological Review, 56(4), 494–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fairleigh Dickinson University. “Some news leaves people knowing less.” [Press release by the PublicMind project]. 21 November 2011. Retrieved from <http://publicmind.fdu.edu/2011/knowless/> on 10 January 2012.
  22. Fine, G. (1985). Rumors and gossiping. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis, vol. 3 (pp. 223–237). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  23. Fragale, A. R., & Heath, C. (2004). Evolving informational credentials: the (mis)attribution of believable facts to credible sources. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(2), 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fricker, E. (1995). Telling and trusting: reductionism and anti-reductionism in the epistemology of testimony. Mind, 104, 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fricker, M. (1998). Rational authority and social power: towards a truly social epistemology. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (New Series), 98, 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gelfert, A. (2011). Expertise, argumentation, and the end of inquiry. Argumentation, 25(3), 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gelfert, A. (forthcoming). Communicability and the public misuse of communication: Kant on the pathologies of testimony. In S. Bacin, A. Ferrarin, C. La Rocca & M. Ruffing (Eds.), Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht/Kant and Philosophy in a Cosmopolitan Sense (Proceedings of the Eleventh International Kant Congress, Pisa 2010). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  28. Goldberg, S. (2005). Testimonial knowledge through unsafe testimony. Analysis, 65(4), 302–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goldberg, S. (2007). Anti-individualism: Mind and language, knowledge and justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goldberg, S. (2010). Relying on others: An essay in epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goldman, A. (2001). Experts: which ones should you trust? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63(1), 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goodman, R. F., & Ben-Ze’ev, A. (Eds.). (1994). Good gossip. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
  33. Gottschalk, L. M. (2006). In Notes of a pianist. (Ed. J. Behrend.) Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hardwig, J. (1985). Epistemic dependence. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(7), 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Helm, S., Liehr-Gobbers, K., & Storck, C. (Eds.). (2011). Reputation management. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Jones, W. E. (2005). Rumor, reproach, and the norms of testimony. Public Affairs Quarterly, 19(3), 195–212.Google Scholar
  37. Kant, I. (1996). The metaphysics of morals (trans: Gregor, M. J.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Keren, A. (2007). Epistemic authority, testimony, and the transmission of knowledge. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, 4(3), 368–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kitcher, P. (1990). The division of cognitive labor. The Journal of Philosophy, 87(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kuran, T., & Sunstein, C. R. (1999). Availability cascades and risk regulation. Stanford Law Review, 51(4), 683–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kurland, N. B., & Pelled, L. H. (2000). Passing the word: toward a model of gossip and power in the workplace. The Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 428–438.Google Scholar
  42. Lackey, J. (1999). Testimonial knowledge and transmission. The Philosophical Quarterly, 49(197), 471–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Levy, N. (2007). Radically socialized knowledge and conspiracy theories. Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, 4(2), 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McDowell, J. (1998). Knowledge by hearsay. In J. McDowell (Ed.), Meaning, knowledge, and reality (pp. 414–443). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Miller, D. E. (2006). Rumor: an examination of some stereotypes. Symbolic Interaction, 28(4), 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Noon, M., & Delbridge, R. (1993). News from behind my hand: gossip in organizations. Organization Studies, 14(1), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Packer, G. (2006). Knowing the enemy. The New Yorker, December 18: 60–69.Google Scholar
  48. Paine, R. (1967). What is gossip about? An alternative hypothesis. Man (New Series), 2(2), 278–285.Google Scholar
  49. Prasad, J. (1935). The psychology of rumour: a study relating to the great Indian earthquake of 1934. British Journal of Psychology, 26(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  50. Pritchard, D. (2004). The epistemology of testimony. Philosophical Issues, 14, 326–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rosnow, R. (1988). Rumor as communication: a contextualist approach. Journal of Communication, 38(1), 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rosnow, R., & Fine, G. A. (1976). Rumor and gossip: The social psychology of hearsay. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  53. Rudolph, E. E. (1973). Informal human communication systems in a large organization. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 1(1), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schindler, M. (2007). Rumors in financial markets: Insights into behavioral finance. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  55. Shibutani, T. (1966). Improvised news: A sociological study of rumor. Indianapolis: Bob Merrill.Google Scholar
  56. Sunstein, C. R. (2008). ‘She said what?’ ‘He did that?’: believing false rumors. (21 November 2008). Harvard Public Law Working Paper, No. 08-56. Available from SSRN, <http://ssrn.com/abstract=1304268>. Accessed on 13 May 2011.
  57. Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: causes and cures. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(2), 202–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Webster, T. B. L. (1954). Personification as a mode of Greek thought. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 17(1/2), 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weinberg, S. B., & Eich, R. K. (1978). Fighting fire with fire: establishment of a rumor control center. Communication Quarterly, 26(3), 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Westacott, E. (2000). The ethics of gossiping. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 14(1), 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wrinch, P. N. (1951). Science and politics in the U.S.S.R.: the genetics debate. World Politics, 3(4), 486–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts and Social SciencesNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations