In this paper I outline the main features of Karen Bennett’s (Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1–21, 2011) non-classical mereology, and identify its methodological costs. I argue that Bennett’s mereology cannot account for the composition of structural universals because it cannot explain the mereological difference between isomeric universals, such as being butane and being isobutane. I consider responses, which come at costs to the view.
Mereology Parts Isobutane Armstrong Bennett
Armstrong, D. M. (1978). Universals and scientific realism II: A theory of universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar