Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

What Role Should Propositions Have in the Theory of Meaning? Review Essay: Scott Soames. What is meaning?

Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010. Pp. ix, 132.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Davidson, D. (2001a). Radical Interpretation. In: Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. New York: Clarendon Press. Original edition, 1973

  2. Davidson, D. (2001b). Reply to Foster. In: Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. New York: Clarendon Press. Original edition, 1976.

  3. Hanks, P. (2011). Structured propositions as types. Mind, 120, 11–53.

  4. Lepore, E., & Ludwig, K. (2005). Donald Davidson: Meaning, truth, language, and reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  5. Lepore, E., & Ludwig, K. (2011). Truth and meaning redux. Philosophical Studies, 154, 251–277.

  6. Soames, S. (2008). Truth and meaning: in perspective. Truth and Its Deformities: Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 32, 1–19.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Kirk Ludwig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ludwig, K. What Role Should Propositions Have in the Theory of Meaning? Review Essay: Scott Soames. What is meaning? . Philosophia 40, 885–901 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-012-9368-3

Download citation