Philosophia

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 223–236

Overlapping Consensus or Marketplace of Religions? Rawls and Smith

Article

Abstract

In this paper, I examine the claim that Rawls’s overlapping consensus is too narrow to allow most mainstream religions’ participation in political discourse. I do so by asking whether religious exclusion is a consequence of belief or action, using conversion as a paradigm case. After concluding that this objection to Rawls is, in fact, defensible, and that the overlapping consensus excludes both religious belief and action, I examine an alternative approach to managing religious pluralism as presented by Adam Smith. I show that Smith’s so-called “marketplace of religions” assumes and encourages religious conversion. I then offer objections to Smith’s approach from Rawls’s point of view, concluding that, while Rawls cannot adequately respond to the Smithian challenge, in the end the two positions are complimentary.

Keywords

Adam Smith John Rawls Overlapping consensus Religious conversion Marketplace of religions Political liberalism 

References

  1. Barry, B. (1993). “Good For Us, But Not For Them,” The Guardian (p. 23). London: Guardian Newspapers Limited.Google Scholar
  2. Buchanan, J. W. (1976). “The justice of natural liberty” Legal studies, pp. 1-16.Google Scholar
  3. Dworkin, R. (1984). Liberalisms. In M. Sandel (Ed.), Liberalism and its critics (pp. 60–70). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Fleischacker, S. (1999). A third concept of liberty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Galston, W. (1991). Liberal purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gaskin, J. C. A. (1993). “Hume on religion” The Cambridge companion to hume (pp. 480–514). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Griswold, C. L., Jr. (1999). Adam Smith and the virtues of enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hanley, R. P. (2010). Scepticism and naturalism in Adam Smith. In V. Brown & S. Fleischacker (Eds.), The philosophy of Adam Smith (The Adam Smith Review volume 5) (pp. 198–212). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Heirich, M. (1978). Change of Heart. The American Journal of Sociology, 83, 653–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hershovitz, S. (2000). A Mere Modus Vivendi? In V. Davion & C. Wolf (Eds.), The idea of political liberalism (pp. 221–230). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  11. Khalil, E. L. (1998). Is justice the primary feature of the state? Adam Smith’s Critique of Social Contract Theory. European Journal of Law and Economics, 6, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Montes, L. (2004). Adam Smith in Context. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  13. Otteson, J. (2002). Adam Smith’s Marketplace of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Rawls, J. (2001a). “The idea of public reason revisited”, The laws of peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rawls, J. (2001b). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rawls, J. (2001c). The laws of peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Rawls, J. (2009). On my religion. In T. Nagel (Ed.), A brief inquiry into the meaning of sin & faith. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Richardson, J. T. (1985). The active vs. passive convert. Journal for Scientific Study of Religion, 24, 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schwartzman, M. (December 10, 2010). The ethics of reasoning from conjecture. Journal of Moral Philosophy, forthcoming; Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2011-02. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1730340.
  22. Smith, A. (1976). In R. H. Campbell & A. S. Skinner (Eds.), An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, 2 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, A. (1982). In A. L. Macfie & D. D. Raphael (Eds.), Theory of moral sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
  24. Snow, D. A., & Machalek, R. (1983). The convert as social type. In R. Collins (Ed.), Sociological theory (pp. 259–289). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Snow, D. A., & Machalek. (1984). The sociology of conversion. American Review of Sociology, 10, 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Steinberger, P. (2000). The Impossibility of a ‘Political’ Conception. The Journal of Politics, 62(1), 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. von Villez, C. (2006). Double standard – naturally! Smith and Rawls: a comparison of methods. In L. Montes & E. Schliesser (Eds.), New voices on Adam Smith (pp. 115–139). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Weinstein, J. R. (1997). Adam Smith and the Problem of Neutrality in Liberal Theory. Ann Arbor: UMI.Google Scholar
  29. Weinstein, J. R. (2004). Review: James W Otteson’s ‘Adam Smith’s Marketplace of Life. Mind, 113(449), 202–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weinstein, J. R. (2006). Sympathy, difference, and education: social unity in the work of Adam Smith. Economics and Philosophy, 22(1), 79–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weinstein, J. R. (2007). Adam Smith’s Philosophy of Education. The Adam Smith Review, 3, 51–74.Google Scholar
  32. Weinstein, J. R. (forthcoming). Adam Smith’s pluralism. New Haven: Yale.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and ReligionUniversity of North DakotaGrand ForksUSA

Personalised recommendations