Advertisement

Philosophia

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 285–293 | Cite as

What is Wrong with “What is Wrong with Rational Suicide”

  • Michael Cholbi
Article

Abstract

In “What is Wrong with Rational Suicide,” Pilpel and Amsel develop a counterexample that allegedly confounds attempts to condition the moral permissibility of suicide on its rationality. In this counterexample, a healthy middle aged woman with significant life accomplishments, but no dependents, disease, or mental disorder opts to end her life painlessly after reading philosophical texts that persuade her that life is meaningless and bereft of intrinsic value. Many people would judge her suicide “a bad mistake” despite its meeting “robust” conditions for rationality. Hence, Pilpel and Amsel conclude, even robust conditions for the rationality of suicide “fail to do their job: to exclude intuitively unacceptable suicides from being permissible.” I argue here that this counterexample fails to cast doubt on philosophical attempts to account for the moral permissibility of suicide in terms of its rationality.

Keywords

Suicide Rationality Right to die Autonomy 

References

  1. Battin, M. (1995). The death debate: Ethical issues in suicide. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Brandt, R. (1992). The morality and rationality of suicide. In his Morality, utilitarianism, and rights (pp. 315–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Hill, T. E. (1991). Self-regarding suicide: A modified Kantian view. In his Autonomy and self- respect (pp. 85–103). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Kamm, F. M. (1997). A right to choose death? Boston review (available at: http://bostonreview.net/BR22.3/Kamm.html).
  5. Kass, L. R. (1993). Is there a right to die? The Hastings Center Report, 23, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lebacqz, K., & Engelhardt, H. T. (1980). Suicide. In D. J. Horan & D. Mall (Eds.), Death, dying, and euthanasia. Frederick: Praeger.Google Scholar
  7. Luper, S. (2009). Philosophy of death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Mill, J. S. (1869). On liberty. Google Scholar
  9. Nozick R. et al. (1997). Assisted suicide: The philosophers’ brief. New York review of books (available at: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1997/mar/27/assisted-suicide-the-philosophers-brief/).
  10. Quinn, W. (1993). Morality and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Sunstein, C. (1997). The right to die. Yale Law Journal, 106, 1123–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Velleman, J. D. (1992). Against the right to die. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 17, 665–681.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyCalifornia State Polytechnic UniversityPomonaUSA

Personalised recommendations