Philosophia

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 657–672 | Cite as

Living Dogma and Marriage

Article
  • 219 Downloads

Abstract

The decision to get married, as well as choosing whom to marry, is of the utmost importance to most people. This decision consists of many amoral considerations, but an ethical relationship arises when a promise is made, especially a vow that binds for a lifetime and affects oneself, one’s spouse, one’s children, and society. This essay provides an account of ideal romantic marriage, arguing that John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty provides an excellent foundation for constructing such an account. Neither dead dogma nor living truth is a healthy model for marriage, so a hybrid model of marriage, living dogma, is developed. The importance of the marital vow becomes apparent as the living dogma account is revealed, and this examination yields a model for how to decide when and whom to marry.

Keywords

Duties Vows Love Marriage Practical rationality 

References

  1. Armstrong, J. (2002). Conditions of love: The philosophy of intimacy (p. 128). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  2. Cicovacki, P. (1993). On love and fidelity in marriage. Journal of Social Philosophy, 24, 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Frankfurt, H. (2004). The reasons for love (p. 56). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Frankfurt, H. (2006). In D. Satz (Ed.), Taking ourselves seriously & getting it right (pp. 18–19). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fromm, E. (1962). The art of living: An inquiry into the nature of love (p. 4). New York: Harper Colophon Books.Google Scholar
  6. Kolodny, N. (2003). Love as valuing a relationship. The Philosophical Review, 112, 135–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Landau, I. (2004). An argument for marriage. Philosophy, 79, 476–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Martin, M. W. (1993). Love’s constancy. Philosophy, 68, 68.Google Scholar
  9. Martin, M. W. (1994). Adultery and fidelity. Journal of Social Philosophy, 25, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mill, J. S. (1985). On liberty (p. 97). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Moller, D. (2003). An argument against marriage. Philosophy, 78, 82–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nozick, R. (1989). The examined life (p. 75). New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  13. Russell, B. (1970). Marriage and morals (p. 141). New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
  14. Singer, I. (1987a). The nature of love: Plato to Luther (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 4–5). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Singer, I. (1987b). The nature of love: The modern world (Vol. III, p. 392). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Solomon, R. C. (1990). Love: Emotion, myth & metaphor (p. 226). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations