Philosophia

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 667–690

Reply to Comments on Science and the Pursuit of Wisdom

Article

Abstract

In this article I reply to comments made by Agustin Vicente and Giridhari Lal Pandit on Science and the Pursuit of Wisdom (McHenry 2009). I criticize analytic philosophy, go on to expound the argument for the need for a revolution in academic inquiry so that the basic aim becomes wisdom and not just knowledge, defend aim-oriented empiricism, outline my solution to the human world/physical universe problem, and defend the thesis that free will is compatible with physicalism.

Keywords

Science Wisdom Knowledge Academic inquiry Academic revolution Philosophy of science Metaphysics Values Rationality Global problems Social inquiry Philosophy Human world/physical universe problem Mind/brain problem Perception Consciousness Free will Karl Popper 

References

  1. Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  2. Friedman, M. (1974). Explanation and scientific understanding. Journal of Philosophy, 71, 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jackson, F. (1982). Epiphenomenal qualia. Philosophical Quarterly, 32, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jackson, F. (1986). What Mary didn’t know. Journal of Philosophy, 83, 291–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kitcher, P. (1989). Explanatory unification and causal structure. In P. Kitcher & W. C. Salmon (Eds.), Scientific explanation, vol. XIII of Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 428–448). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  6. Kripke, S. (1986). Naming and necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Lane, N. (2009). Life ascending. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  8. Libet, B., Gleason, C. A., Wright, E. W., & Pearl, D. K. (1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain 106, 623–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Maxwell, N. (1966). Physics and common sense. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 16, 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maxwell, N. (1968a). Can there be necessary connections between successive events? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 19, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maxwell, N. (1968b). Understanding sensations. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 46, 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Maxwell, N. (1972a). A critique of Popper’s views on scientific method. Philosophy of Science, 39, 131–52 (reprinted in A. O’Hear, ed., 2004, Popper: Critical assessments of leading philosophers, vol. II, Routledge, London pp. 463–487).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maxwell, N. (1972b). A new look at the quantum mechanical problem of measurement. American Journal of Physics, 40, 1431–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maxwell, N. (1974). The rationality of scientific discovery. Philosophy of Science, 41, 123–53 and 247–95.Google Scholar
  15. Maxwell, N. (1976a). What’s wrong with science? Bran’s Head Books, Frome (2nd edition, 2009, Pentire Press, London).Google Scholar
  16. Maxwell, N. (1976b). Towards a micro realistic version of quantum mechanics, Parts I and II. Foundations of Physics, 6, 275–292 and 661–676.Google Scholar
  17. Maxwell, N. (1980). Science, reason, knowledge and wisdom: a critique of specialism. Inquiry, 23, 19–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maxwell, N. (1982). Instead of particles and fields. Foundations of Physics, 12, 607–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maxwell, N. (1984). From knowledge to wisdom: A revolution in the aims and methods of science. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 2nd edition Pentire Press, London, 2007.Google Scholar
  20. Maxwell, N. (1988). Quantum propensiton theory: a testable resolution of the wave/particle dilemma. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39, 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maxwell, N. (1992a). What kind of inquiry can best help us create a good world? Science, Technology and Human Values, 17, 205–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maxwell, N. (1993a). Induction and scientific realism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44, 61–79, 81–101 and 275–305.Google Scholar
  23. Maxwell, N. (1994). Particle creation as the quantum condition for probabilistic events to occur. Physics Letters A, 187, 351–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maxwell, N. (1998). The comprehensibility of the universe: A new conception of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Paperback ed., 2003.Google Scholar
  25. Maxwell, N. (2000a). Can humanity learn to become civilized? The crisis of science without civilization. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 17, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maxwell, N. (2000b). A new conception of science. Physics World, 13(8), 17–18.Google Scholar
  27. Maxwell, N. (2000c). The mind-body problem and explanatory dualism. Philosophy, 75, 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maxwell, N. (2001). The human world in the physical universe: Consciousness, free will and evolution. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  29. Maxwell, N. (2002a). The need for a revolution in the philosophy of science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 33, 381–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maxwell, N. (2002b). Karl Raimund Popper. In P. Dematteis, P. Fosl, & L. McHenry (Eds.), British philosophers, 1800–2000 (pp. 176–194). Columbia: Bruccoli Clark Layman. See also http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00001686/.Google Scholar
  31. Maxwell, N. (2004a). Is science neurotic? London: Imperial College.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maxwell, N. (2004b). Scientific metaphysics. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00001674/
  33. Maxwell, N. (2004c). Non-empirical requirements scientific theories must satisfy: Simplicity, unification, explanation, beauty, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00001759/
  34. Maxwell, N. (2004d). Does probabilism solve the great quantum mystery? Theoria, 19/3(51), 321–336.Google Scholar
  35. Maxwell, N. (2005). Popper, Kuhn, Lakatos and aim-oriented empiricism. Philosophia, 32(1–4), 181–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maxwell, N., & Maxwell, N. (2006a). The enlightenment programme and Karl Popper. In I. Jarvie, K. Milford, & D. Miller (Eds.), Karl Popper: A centenary assessment, vol. 1: Life and times, values in a world of facts (pp. 177–190). London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  37. Maxwell, N. (2006b). Three problems about consciousness and their possible resolution. PMS WIPS 005, Nov 15, http://www.petemandik.com/blog/?s=maxwell.
  38. Maxwell, N. (2007a). From knowledge to wisdom: A revolution for science and the humanities. London: Pentire. 2nd edition of Maxwell (1984), revised and extended.Google Scholar
  39. Maxwell, N. (2007b). Can the world learn wisdom? Solidarity, sustainability, and non-violence, 3(4), April 2007, http://www.pelicanweb.org/solisustv03n04maxwell.html
  40. Maxwell, N. (2007c). From knowledge to wisdom: The need for an academic revolution. London Review of Education, 5(2), 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maxwell, N. (2007d). The enlightenment, Popper and Einstein. In Y. Shi et al. (Eds.), Knowledge and wisdom: Advances in multiple criteria decision making and human systems management. IOS Press, 2007, pp 131–148.Google Scholar
  42. Maxwell, N. (2007e). The disastrous war against terrorism: Violence versus enlightenment. In A. W. Merkidze (Ed.), Ch. 3 of terrorism issues: Threat assessment, consequences and prevention (pp. 111–133). New York: Nova Science. available on my website www.nick-maxwell.demon.co.uk.Google Scholar
  43. Maxwell, N. (2008). Do we need a scientific revolution? Journal for Biological Physics and Chemistry, 8(3), 95–105.Google Scholar
  44. Maxwell, N. (2009a). Are universities undergoing an intellectual revolution? Oxford Magazine, 290, 213–16. Eighth Week, Trinity Term, June.Google Scholar
  45. Maxwell, N. (2009b). From knowledge to wisdom. In Cayley David (Ed.), Ideas on the nature of science, Goose Lane Editions (pp. 360–378). Canada: New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  46. Maxwell, N. (2009c). How can life of value best flourish in the real world? In Leemon McHenry (Ed.), Science and the pursuit of wisdom: Studies in the philosophy of Nicholas Maxwell. Ontos Verlag, 2009, pp 1–56.Google Scholar
  47. Maxwell, N. (2009d). Replies and reflections. In Leemon McHenry (Ed.), Science and the pursuit of wisdom: Studies in the philosophy of Nicholas Maxwell. Ontos Verlag, 2009, pp 249-313.Google Scholar
  48. Maxwell, N. (2009e). What’s wrong with science? Sublime, 17(2009), 90–93.Google Scholar
  49. Maxwell, N. (2010a). Cutting God in half—and putting the pieces together again: A new approach to philosophy. London: Pentire.Google Scholar
  50. Maxwell, N. (2010b). A priori conjectural knowledge in physics. In Michael Shaffer & Michael Veber (Eds.), What place for the a priori. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  51. Maxwell, N. (2010c). Popper’s paradoxical pursuit of natural philosophy. In Shearmur Jeremy & Stokes Geoffrey (Eds.), Cambridge companion to Popper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Maxwell, N. (2010d). Is the quantum world composed of propensitons? In Suárez Mauricio (Ed.), Probabilities, causes and propensities in physics. Dordrecht: Synthese Library, Springer.Google Scholar
  53. McHenry, L. (2009). Science and the pursuit of wisdom: Studies in the philosophy of Nicholas Maxwell. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.Google Scholar
  54. Motion, O. (2009). Eating the sun. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  55. Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83, 435–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pandit, G. L. (2010). Aim oriented empiricism. Friends of Wisdom Newsletter, 6th edn, http://www.knowledgetowisdom.org/Newsletter%206.pdf, pp 30–37.
  57. Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  58. Popper, K. (1962). The poverty of historicism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  59. Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  60. Popper, K. (1969). The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  61. Popper, K. (1982). Quantum theory and the schism in physics. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  62. Smart, J. J. C. (1963). Philosophy and scientific realism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  63. Smith, P., & Jones, O. R. (1986). The philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wegner, D. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Science and Technology StudiesUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations