In this essay I offer a detailed reply to three critics (whose commentaries are included in this issue of Philosophia) of my Forgiveness: a Philosophical Exploration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007). The topics explored include the nature and limits of forgiveness; its unconditional or conditional character; the problem of distinguishing between central and marginal cases; the analysis of political apology; and questions of philosophical methodology.
KeywordsForgiveness Unconditional forgiveness Conditional forgiveness Paradigm cases Excuse Condonation Clemency Mercy Reconciliation Anger Moral ideals Virtue theory Secular and religious approaches Analytical strategy
- Butler, J. (1896). The works of Joseph Butler, D.C.L. W. E. Gladstone (Ed.), 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Kraybill, D. B., Nolt, S. M., & Weaver-Zercher, D. L. (2007). Amish grace: How forgiveness transcended tragedy. San Francisco: J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Murphy, J. (2003). Getting even: Forgiveness and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Murphy, J. G., & Hampton, J. (1998). Forgiveness and mercy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, N. (2008). I was wrong: The meanings of apologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Strawson, P. F. (1980). Freedom and resentment. In Freedom and resentment and other essays (pp. 1–25). New York: Methuen.Google Scholar